Grounding the history of modern warfare: An extended book review of Peter Thompson's The Gas Mask in Interwar Germany

Ulf Schmidt
{"title":"Grounding the history of modern warfare: An extended book review of Peter Thompson's The Gas Mask in Interwar Germany","authors":"Ulf Schmidt","doi":"10.1002/ntls.20230021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Ever since Germany's use of chlorine gas on the battlefields of Flanders during the First World War, modern warfare has become synonymous with gas warfare, its images an iconographic shorthand for a detached, humiliating, and dishonourable death, and the gas mask a modern symbol of memento mori, a reminder of our own mortality. The paper argues that a critical history of chemical weapons and protective technologies, which is firmly grounded in the historiography and pays particular attention to the wider political and scientific context and related complexities, can help to facilitate greater public understanding and a willingness among key stakeholders to prioritise a shared interest: the creation of a world free from chemical weapons once and for all. Through an extended book review of Peter Thompson's recent book <i>The Gas Mask in Interwar Germany</i>, the paper seeks to demonstrate that writing such a history of modern warfare poses distinct challenges. Across eight chapters, the book covers, among others, the history of the first attack with chlorine gas in 1915, the development of gas masks, the perceived fear of gas among soldiers, the role of doctors in treating gas casualties, the role and writings of “gas specialists”, and, last but not least, the alleged realisation of a specific “Nazi chemical modernity”, through which the author attempts to connect the subject matter with the Holocaust. Such a wide-ranging, longue durée perspective can be fruitful if it is done with an attention to critical source analyses and balanced argumentation. Whether the book will inspire scholars to “rewrite the history of the twentieth century”, as the author implies, remains to be seen, but its broad discussion about the perceived and real implications of chemical agents and other “invisible toxins” undoubtedly offers food for thought in an increasingly volatile and seemingly threatening world.","PeriodicalId":501225,"journal":{"name":"Natural Sciences","volume":"31 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Natural Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ntls.20230021","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Ever since Germany's use of chlorine gas on the battlefields of Flanders during the First World War, modern warfare has become synonymous with gas warfare, its images an iconographic shorthand for a detached, humiliating, and dishonourable death, and the gas mask a modern symbol of memento mori, a reminder of our own mortality. The paper argues that a critical history of chemical weapons and protective technologies, which is firmly grounded in the historiography and pays particular attention to the wider political and scientific context and related complexities, can help to facilitate greater public understanding and a willingness among key stakeholders to prioritise a shared interest: the creation of a world free from chemical weapons once and for all. Through an extended book review of Peter Thompson's recent book The Gas Mask in Interwar Germany, the paper seeks to demonstrate that writing such a history of modern warfare poses distinct challenges. Across eight chapters, the book covers, among others, the history of the first attack with chlorine gas in 1915, the development of gas masks, the perceived fear of gas among soldiers, the role of doctors in treating gas casualties, the role and writings of “gas specialists”, and, last but not least, the alleged realisation of a specific “Nazi chemical modernity”, through which the author attempts to connect the subject matter with the Holocaust. Such a wide-ranging, longue durée perspective can be fruitful if it is done with an attention to critical source analyses and balanced argumentation. Whether the book will inspire scholars to “rewrite the history of the twentieth century”, as the author implies, remains to be seen, but its broad discussion about the perceived and real implications of chemical agents and other “invisible toxins” undoubtedly offers food for thought in an increasingly volatile and seemingly threatening world.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
现代战争史的基础:彼得-汤普森的《战时德国的防毒面具》延伸书评
自从第一次世界大战期间德国在佛兰德斯战场上使用氯气以来,现代战争就成了毒气战的代名词,毒气战的形象成了离群索居、屈辱和不光彩死亡的象征,防毒面具成了现代死亡纪念的象征,提醒着我们自己的死亡。本文认为,对化学武器和防护技术进行批判性的历史研究,以历史学为坚实基础,并特别关注更广泛的政治和科学背景以及相关的复杂性,有助于促进公众更好地理解,并使主要利益相关方愿意优先考虑共同利益:建立一个永远没有化学武器的世界。通过对彼得-汤普森(Peter Thompson)最近出版的《战时德国的防毒面具》(The Gas Mask in Interwar Germany)一书的扩展书评,本文试图证明,撰写这样一部现代战争史会带来独特的挑战。该书共分八章,涵盖了 1915 年首次使用氯气攻击的历史、防毒面具的发展、士兵对毒气的恐惧、医生在治疗毒气伤员中的作用、"毒气专家 "的作用和著作,以及最后但并非最不重要的一点,即所谓的 "纳粹化学现代性 "的实现,作者试图通过该书将这一主题与大屠杀联系起来。如果能够注重批判性的资料分析和平衡的论证,这种广泛而长远的视角将是富有成效的。该书是否会像作者暗示的那样,激励学者们 "重写二十世纪的历史",还有待观察,但它对化学制剂和其他 "看不见的毒素 "的感知和实际影响的广泛讨论,无疑为这个日益动荡不安、看似充满威胁的世界提供了思考的食粮。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
First direct detection of large polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons on asteroid (162173) Ryugu samples: An interstellar heritage Thermoring basis for heat unfolding‐induced inactivation in TRPV1 Commentary on “A simple, practical experiment to investigate atomic wavefunction reduction within a Stern‐Gerlach magnet” by Michael Devereux, published in J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 57, 152501 (2024), https://doi.org/10.1088/1361‐6455/ad5992 How inoculation saved the world: A timely acknowledgment of the contribution of an English lady Issue Information ‐ TOC
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1