Moving forward with a culturally inclusive PTSD Criterion A: Commentary on Marx et al. (2023)

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY Journal of traumatic stress Pub Date : 2024-01-16 DOI:10.1002/jts.23016
Maureen A. Allwood
{"title":"Moving forward with a culturally inclusive PTSD Criterion A: Commentary on Marx et al. (2023)","authors":"Maureen A. Allwood","doi":"10.1002/jts.23016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In response to Marx et al.’s (2023) article, “The PTSD Criterion A debate: A brief history, current status, and recommendations for moving forward,” this commentary offers agreement with the recommendation to conduct population-based studies to inform future Criterion A changes. However, to fully address the debate as to whether Criterion A should be expanded, limited, eliminated, or remain unchanged, it is critical that future population-based research focus on cultural inclusivity and the addition of potentially traumatic experiences that are collective and/or cumulative versus individual and discrete. To further understand the etiology of mental health distress and disorder and the role of adverse life experiences, it is also recommended that adverse event specifiers be added to disorders not currently considered to be event-related. The ability to identify the potential long-term effects of adverse life experiences in relation to disorders other than posttraumatic stress disorder (e.g., major depressive disorder) could help validate experiences, reduce stigma, and further advance research on etiology and interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":17519,"journal":{"name":"Journal of traumatic stress","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of traumatic stress","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jts.23016","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In response to Marx et al.’s (2023) article, “The PTSD Criterion A debate: A brief history, current status, and recommendations for moving forward,” this commentary offers agreement with the recommendation to conduct population-based studies to inform future Criterion A changes. However, to fully address the debate as to whether Criterion A should be expanded, limited, eliminated, or remain unchanged, it is critical that future population-based research focus on cultural inclusivity and the addition of potentially traumatic experiences that are collective and/or cumulative versus individual and discrete. To further understand the etiology of mental health distress and disorder and the role of adverse life experiences, it is also recommended that adverse event specifiers be added to disorders not currently considered to be event-related. The ability to identify the potential long-term effects of adverse life experiences in relation to disorders other than posttraumatic stress disorder (e.g., major depressive disorder) could help validate experiences, reduce stigma, and further advance research on etiology and interventions.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
推进具有文化包容性的创伤后应激障碍标准 A:对 Marx 等人(2023 年)的评论。
针对 Marx 等人(2023 年)的文章 "创伤后应激障碍 A 标准之争:简史、现状及下一步建议 "一文,本评论同意开展基于人群的研究,为标准 A 的未来变化提供依据的建议。然而,为了全面解决关于标准 A 是应该扩展、限制、取消还是保持不变的争论,未来基于人群的研究必须关注文化包容性,并增加集体和/或累积性的潜在创伤经历,而非个体和离散性的潜在创伤经历。为了进一步了解心理健康困扰和失调的病因以及不良生活经历的作用,我们还建议为目前不被认为与事件相关的失调症添加不良事件特指。如果能够确定不利生活经历对创伤后应激障碍以外的其他失调症(如重度抑郁障碍)的潜在长期影响,将有助于验证这些经历,减少耻辱感,并进一步推动病因学和干预措施方面的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
6.10%
发文量
125
期刊介绍: Journal of Traumatic Stress (JTS) is published for the International Society for Traumatic Stress Studies. Journal of Traumatic Stress , the official publication for the International Society for Traumatic Stress Studies, is an interdisciplinary forum for the publication of peer-reviewed original papers on biopsychosocial aspects of trauma. Papers focus on theoretical formulations, research, treatment, prevention education/training, and legal and policy concerns. Journal of Traumatic Stress serves as a primary reference for professionals who study and treat people exposed to highly stressful and traumatic events (directly or through their occupational roles), such as war, disaster, accident, violence or abuse (criminal or familial), hostage-taking, or life-threatening illness. The journal publishes original articles, brief reports, review papers, commentaries, and, from time to time, special issues devoted to a single topic.
期刊最新文献
The three axioms of resilience. A functional approach to defining and repairing moral injury: Evidence, change agents, clinical strategies, and lessons learned. Walking the line between fidelity and flexibility: A conceptual review of personalized approaches to manualized treatments for posttraumatic stress disorder. Medical traumatic stress: Integrating evidence-based clinical applications from health and trauma psychology. Conceptualizing disparities and differences in the psychobiology of traumatic stress.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1