In search of the origins of crime continuity: Aggressive versus nonaggressive delinquency as a key factor in the psychological inertia process

IF 2.7 2区 心理学 Q1 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES Aggressive Behavior Pub Date : 2024-01-16 DOI:10.1002/ab.22134
Glenn D. Walters, Jon Kremser, Lindsey Runell
{"title":"In search of the origins of crime continuity: Aggressive versus nonaggressive delinquency as a key factor in the psychological inertia process","authors":"Glenn D. Walters,&nbsp;Jon Kremser,&nbsp;Lindsey Runell","doi":"10.1002/ab.22134","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The purpose of this study was to test whether the psychological inertia process believed to give rise to crime continuity is limited to aggressive delinquency or evolves from both aggressive and nonaggressive delinquency. Self-report data provided by 845 early adolescent youth (406 boys, 439 girls) were analyzed in an effort to test the hypothesis that aggressive rather than nonaggressive delinquency precipitates a rise in delinquency through the intervening influence of cognitive impulsivity but not moral neutralization. The hypothesis stated that of the four models evaluated in this study (aggressive delinquency → moral neutralization → offense variety; aggressive delinquency → cognitive impulsivity → offense variety; nonaggressive delinquency → moral neutralization → offense variety; nonaggressive delinquency → cognitive impulsivity → offense variety), only the aggressive delinquency → cognitive impulsivity → offense variety model would achieve significance. Consistent with this hypothesis, only the aggressive delinquency → cognitive impulsivity → offense variety pathway was, in fact, significant. The current findings suggest that the psychological inertia process may be driven by a pattern of aggressive delinquency followed by cognitive impulsivity and that neither nonaggressive delinquency nor moral neutralization contribute to the process. Theoretical and practical implications of these results are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":50842,"journal":{"name":"Aggressive Behavior","volume":"50 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aggressive Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ab.22134","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to test whether the psychological inertia process believed to give rise to crime continuity is limited to aggressive delinquency or evolves from both aggressive and nonaggressive delinquency. Self-report data provided by 845 early adolescent youth (406 boys, 439 girls) were analyzed in an effort to test the hypothesis that aggressive rather than nonaggressive delinquency precipitates a rise in delinquency through the intervening influence of cognitive impulsivity but not moral neutralization. The hypothesis stated that of the four models evaluated in this study (aggressive delinquency → moral neutralization → offense variety; aggressive delinquency → cognitive impulsivity → offense variety; nonaggressive delinquency → moral neutralization → offense variety; nonaggressive delinquency → cognitive impulsivity → offense variety), only the aggressive delinquency → cognitive impulsivity → offense variety model would achieve significance. Consistent with this hypothesis, only the aggressive delinquency → cognitive impulsivity → offense variety pathway was, in fact, significant. The current findings suggest that the psychological inertia process may be driven by a pattern of aggressive delinquency followed by cognitive impulsivity and that neither nonaggressive delinquency nor moral neutralization contribute to the process. Theoretical and practical implications of these results are discussed.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
寻找犯罪持续性的根源:攻击性与非攻击性犯罪是心理惰性过程中的一个关键因素
本研究的目的在于检验,被认为会导致犯罪持续发生的心理惯性过程是仅限于攻击性犯罪,还是由攻击性和非攻击性犯罪演变而来。研究分析了 845 名青春期早期青少年(406 名男孩,439 名女孩)提供的自我报告数据,试图验证以下假设:通过认知冲动而非道德中和的干预影响,攻击性犯罪而非非攻击性犯罪会促使犯罪率上升。该假设指出,在本研究评估的四个模型(攻击性犯罪→道德中和→违法行为种类;攻击性犯罪→认知冲动→违法行为种类;非攻击性犯罪→道德中和→违法行为种类;非攻击性犯罪→认知冲动→违法行为种类)中,只有攻击性犯罪→认知冲动→违法行为种类模型能达到显著性。与这一假设相一致的是,事实上只有攻击性犯罪→认知冲动性→犯罪种类这一路径是显著的。目前的研究结果表明,心理惰性过程可能是由攻击性犯罪模式和认知冲动驱动的,而非攻击性犯罪和道德中和都不会对这一过程产生影响。本文讨论了这些结果的理论和实践意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Aggressive Behavior
Aggressive Behavior 医学-行为科学
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
3.40%
发文量
52
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Aggressive Behavior will consider manuscripts in the English language concerning the fields of Animal Behavior, Anthropology, Ethology, Psychiatry, Psychobiology, Psychology, and Sociology which relate to either overt or implied conflict behaviors. Papers concerning mechanisms underlying or influencing behaviors generally regarded as aggressive and the physiological and/or behavioral consequences of being subject to such behaviors will fall within the scope of the journal. Review articles will be considered as well as empirical and theoretical articles. Aggressive Behavior is the official journal of the International Society for Research on Aggression.
期刊最新文献
Cyber Aggression and Suicidal Ideation in Emerging Adults: Examining the Potential Roles of Depressive Symptoms and Nonsuicidal Self-Injury A Diathesis-Stress Approach to Understanding Partner Maltreatment Perpetration: A Longitudinal Study How Spiteful Are We? Validation of the Spitefulness Scale in Spaniards Online Violence in Adolescent and Young Adult Couples: The Role of Anxious Attachment and Hostile Sexism in a Dyadic Analysis The Pleasure of Revenge Predicts Both Vengeful and Benevolent Motivations Toward the Provocateur
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1