Intercropping indices evaluation on grain legume-small grain cereals mixture: a critical meta-analysis review

IF 6.4 1区 农林科学 Q1 AGRONOMY Agronomy for Sustainable Development Pub Date : 2024-01-17 DOI:10.1007/s13593-023-00934-4
Riccardo Zustovi, Sofie Landschoot, Kevin Dewitte, Greet Verlinden, Reena Dubey, Steven Maenhout, Geert Haesaert
{"title":"Intercropping indices evaluation on grain legume-small grain cereals mixture: a critical meta-analysis review","authors":"Riccardo Zustovi, Sofie Landschoot, Kevin Dewitte, Greet Verlinden, Reena Dubey, Steven Maenhout, Geert Haesaert","doi":"10.1007/s13593-023-00934-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Intercropping is a mature and well-known agronomic practice that began to attract interest from the scientific community in the mid-1900s and has known an exponential growth in research activity since the beginning of this century. Over the years, different intercropping indices have been developed to evaluate the performance of this crop production system in comparison to standard monoculture practices. Nowadays, more than 20 of these intercropping indices have been described in scientific literature. This review aims to review these indices and check their performance using a meta-dataset consisting of data points from various intercropping experiments that have been described in peer-reviewed publications. Our results show that different indices evaluate different aspects of intercropping trials and that commonly used indices generally do not capture the full performance of the system. More specifically, intercropping results are influenced by both the total sowing density and the crop ratio and indices differ in the way that these dependencies are accounted for. This study suggests creating a standard protocol for the intercropping trials and their evaluation as crucial elements to optimize intercropping research.</p>","PeriodicalId":7721,"journal":{"name":"Agronomy for Sustainable Development","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agronomy for Sustainable Development","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-023-00934-4","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Intercropping is a mature and well-known agronomic practice that began to attract interest from the scientific community in the mid-1900s and has known an exponential growth in research activity since the beginning of this century. Over the years, different intercropping indices have been developed to evaluate the performance of this crop production system in comparison to standard monoculture practices. Nowadays, more than 20 of these intercropping indices have been described in scientific literature. This review aims to review these indices and check their performance using a meta-dataset consisting of data points from various intercropping experiments that have been described in peer-reviewed publications. Our results show that different indices evaluate different aspects of intercropping trials and that commonly used indices generally do not capture the full performance of the system. More specifically, intercropping results are influenced by both the total sowing density and the crop ratio and indices differ in the way that these dependencies are accounted for. This study suggests creating a standard protocol for the intercropping trials and their evaluation as crucial elements to optimize intercropping research.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
谷物豆类与小粒谷物混种的间作指数评估:关键荟萃分析综述
间作套种是一种成熟且广为人知的农艺方法,早在 20 世纪中期就开始引起科学界的兴趣,本世纪初以来,研究活动呈指数级增长。多年来,人们开发了不同的间作指数,用于评估这种作物生产系统与标准单一种植方法相比的表现。目前,科学文献中已介绍了 20 多种间作指数。本综述旨在回顾这些指数,并使用由同行评议出版物中描述的各种间作试验数据点组成的元数据集检查其性能。我们的研究结果表明,不同的指数会对间作套种试验的不同方面进行评估,而常用的指数一般不能反映系统的全部性能。更具体地说,间作结果受总播种密度和作物比例的影响,而指数在考虑这些相关性时也各不相同。本研究建议为间作套种试验及其评估制定标准协议,这是优化间作套种研究的关键因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Agronomy for Sustainable Development
Agronomy for Sustainable Development 农林科学-农艺学
CiteScore
10.70
自引率
8.20%
发文量
108
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Agronomy for Sustainable Development (ASD) is a peer-reviewed scientific journal of international scope, dedicated to publishing original research articles, review articles, and meta-analyses aimed at improving sustainability in agricultural and food systems. The journal serves as a bridge between agronomy, cropping, and farming system research and various other disciplines including ecology, genetics, economics, and social sciences. ASD encourages studies in agroecology, participatory research, and interdisciplinary approaches, with a focus on systems thinking applied at different scales from field to global levels. Research articles published in ASD should present significant scientific advancements compared to existing knowledge, within an international context. Review articles should critically evaluate emerging topics, and opinion papers may also be submitted as reviews. Meta-analysis articles should provide clear contributions to resolving widely debated scientific questions.
期刊最新文献
Adaptation rather than adoption: a case study of cropping system change in West Africa Versatile crop yield estimator Carbon footprint of mixed farming crop-livestock rotational-based grazing beef systems using long term experimental data Multidimensional measures of farmer well-being: A scoping review Determinants of oilseed rape-service plant intercropping performance variability across a farmers’ fields network in Western Switzerland
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1