Parent and Teacher Ratings of Tonic and Phasic Irritability in a Clinical Sample.

IF 2.4 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Research on Child and Adolescent Psychopathology Pub Date : 2024-06-01 Epub Date: 2024-01-18 DOI:10.1007/s10802-023-01151-z
Harriet DeGroot, Jamilah Silver, Daniel N Klein, Gabrielle A Carlson
{"title":"Parent and Teacher Ratings of Tonic and Phasic Irritability in a Clinical Sample.","authors":"Harriet DeGroot, Jamilah Silver, Daniel N Klein, Gabrielle A Carlson","doi":"10.1007/s10802-023-01151-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Research on tonic (persistently angry or grumpy mood) and phasic (temper tantrums/outbursts) irritability in youth has utilized community samples and information from parents and youth. We examined whether tonic and phasic irritability are empirically distinguishable and have similar correlates using teacher, in addition to parent, reports in a clinical sample of children and adolescents. The sample included youth aged 5-18 evaluated at a university outpatient clinic, with complete information from 2481 parents and 2449 teachers. We conducted confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) using items from several parent- and teacher-report inventories and examined concurrent associations with psychopathology and functioning. The CFA supported a two-factor model consistent with tonic and phasic irritability in both parent- and teacher-reports. Parent-reported tonic irritability was associated with higher rates of depression and anxiety disorders, suicidality, and antidepressant medication use. Teacher-reported tonic irritability was associated with elevated rates of depression and antidepressant use. Both parent- and teacher-reported phasic irritability were linked to higher rates of ADHD combined type, oppositional defiant/conduct disorders, and referral for rages. Parent- and teacher-reported tonic and phasic irritability were all associated with impaired social functioning. Parents and teachers can distinguish tonic and phasic irritability, which are associated with internalizing and externalizing problems, respectively. Findings were generally consistent across informants, and with prior studies using community samples.</p>","PeriodicalId":36218,"journal":{"name":"Research on Child and Adolescent Psychopathology","volume":" ","pages":"891-903"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research on Child and Adolescent Psychopathology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-023-01151-z","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Research on tonic (persistently angry or grumpy mood) and phasic (temper tantrums/outbursts) irritability in youth has utilized community samples and information from parents and youth. We examined whether tonic and phasic irritability are empirically distinguishable and have similar correlates using teacher, in addition to parent, reports in a clinical sample of children and adolescents. The sample included youth aged 5-18 evaluated at a university outpatient clinic, with complete information from 2481 parents and 2449 teachers. We conducted confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) using items from several parent- and teacher-report inventories and examined concurrent associations with psychopathology and functioning. The CFA supported a two-factor model consistent with tonic and phasic irritability in both parent- and teacher-reports. Parent-reported tonic irritability was associated with higher rates of depression and anxiety disorders, suicidality, and antidepressant medication use. Teacher-reported tonic irritability was associated with elevated rates of depression and antidepressant use. Both parent- and teacher-reported phasic irritability were linked to higher rates of ADHD combined type, oppositional defiant/conduct disorders, and referral for rages. Parent- and teacher-reported tonic and phasic irritability were all associated with impaired social functioning. Parents and teachers can distinguish tonic and phasic irritability, which are associated with internalizing and externalizing problems, respectively. Findings were generally consistent across informants, and with prior studies using community samples.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
临床样本中家长和教师对强直性和阶段性易激惹性的评分。
关于青少年的强直性(持续愤怒或暴躁情绪)和阶段性(发脾气/爆发)易怒的研究利用的是社区样本以及来自家长和青少年的信息。我们对儿童和青少年的临床样本进行了研究,除了家长的报告外,我们还利用教师的报告研究了强直性易怒和阶段性易怒在经验上是否可以区分,以及是否具有相似的相关性。样本包括在一所大学门诊部接受评估的 5-18 岁青少年,其中有 2481 名家长和 2449 名教师提供的完整信息。我们使用多个家长和教师报告清单中的项目进行了确认性因子分析(CFA),并研究了与心理病理学和功能的并发关联。在家长和教师的报告中,CFA 支持与强直性和阶段性暴躁相一致的双因素模型。家长报告的强直性易怒与抑郁症和焦虑症、自杀和抗抑郁药物使用率较高有关。教师报告的强直性易激惹与抑郁症和抗抑郁药物使用率升高有关。家长和教师报告的阶段性易激惹与多动症综合类型、对立违抗/行为障碍以及因暴怒而转诊的比例较高有关。家长和教师报告的强直性和阶段性易怒都与社会功能受损有关。家长和教师可以区分强直性暴躁和阶段性暴躁,它们分别与内化问题和外化问题有关。不同信息提供者的研究结果基本一致,与之前使用社区样本进行的研究结果也基本一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Research on Child and Adolescent Psychopathology
Research on Child and Adolescent Psychopathology Psychology-Developmental and Educational Psychology
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
4.00%
发文量
107
期刊最新文献
Mother-Adolescent Discrepancies in Reports of Relationship Quality and Early Adolescent Internalizing Symptoms. Breaking with the Criteria; Selective Mutism and its Forbidden Connection with Autism. Family Predictors of Specialty Mental Health Service Use in Adolescents: A Prospective Cohort Study. Development of Substance Use Problems: The Role of Adolescent Cannabis Age of Onset, Frequency of Use and Childhood Risk Factors. Black-White Disparity in Child Hyperactivity-Inattention Problems in Families Living Without Sufficient Foods.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1