Rasmus Stokholm, Peter Larsen, Jan Duedal Rölfing, Juozas Petruskevicius, Morten K Rasmussen, Steffen Skov, Rasmus Elsoe
{"title":"Intramedullary nailing versus external ring fixator for treatment of tibial fractures - a study protocol for a randomised clinical trial.","authors":"Rasmus Stokholm, Peter Larsen, Jan Duedal Rölfing, Juozas Petruskevicius, Morten K Rasmussen, Steffen Skov, Rasmus Elsoe","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Tibial shaft fractures are among the most common lower extremity fractures. Treatment of tibial shaft fractures with intramedullary nailing has become the treatment of choice in adults. However, commonly reported outcomes include knee pain, limitations in activities of daily living and reduction in quality of life (QOL). The literature lacks high-quality studies to document superiority of intramedullary nailing versus other surgical treatment methods. The present study aims to compare the 12-month Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) - sport and recreation activities (sport/rec) after standard intramedullary nailing with external ring fixation for adult patients with isolated tibial shaft fractures.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study is a multicentre randomised, prospective clinical trial. A total of 67 patients will be included in the study, and the primary outcome will be the KOOS-sport/rec at 12 months after surgery.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>With KOOS-sport/rec as the primary outcome, the findings of the present study are expected to advance our understanding of knee pain, function and QOL, regardless of the treatment option and the outcome of the study.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>The project is partially funded by the Independent Research Found Denmark.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong></p><p><strong>Clinicaltrials: </strong>gov ID: NCT-03945669, version 1.1, 21 September 2022.</p>","PeriodicalId":11119,"journal":{"name":"Danish medical journal","volume":"71 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Danish medical journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Tibial shaft fractures are among the most common lower extremity fractures. Treatment of tibial shaft fractures with intramedullary nailing has become the treatment of choice in adults. However, commonly reported outcomes include knee pain, limitations in activities of daily living and reduction in quality of life (QOL). The literature lacks high-quality studies to document superiority of intramedullary nailing versus other surgical treatment methods. The present study aims to compare the 12-month Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) - sport and recreation activities (sport/rec) after standard intramedullary nailing with external ring fixation for adult patients with isolated tibial shaft fractures.
Methods: This study is a multicentre randomised, prospective clinical trial. A total of 67 patients will be included in the study, and the primary outcome will be the KOOS-sport/rec at 12 months after surgery.
Conclusions: With KOOS-sport/rec as the primary outcome, the findings of the present study are expected to advance our understanding of knee pain, function and QOL, regardless of the treatment option and the outcome of the study.
Funding: The project is partially funded by the Independent Research Found Denmark.
Trial registration:
Clinicaltrials: gov ID: NCT-03945669, version 1.1, 21 September 2022.
期刊介绍:
The Danish Medical Journal (DMJ) is a general medical journal. The journal publish original research in English – conducted in or in relation to the Danish health-care system. When writing for the Danish Medical Journal please remember target audience which is the general reader. This means that the research area should be relevant to many readers and the paper should be presented in a way that most readers will understand the content.
DMJ will publish the following articles:
• Original articles
• Protocol articles from large randomized clinical trials
• Systematic reviews and meta-analyses
• PhD theses from Danish faculties of health sciences
• DMSc theses from Danish faculties of health sciences.