Intramedullary nailing versus external ring fixator for treatment of tibial fractures - a study protocol for a randomised clinical trial.

IF 1 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Danish medical journal Pub Date : 2023-12-06
Rasmus Stokholm, Peter Larsen, Jan Duedal Rölfing, Juozas Petruskevicius, Morten K Rasmussen, Steffen Skov, Rasmus Elsoe
{"title":"Intramedullary nailing versus external ring fixator for treatment of tibial fractures - a study protocol for a randomised clinical trial.","authors":"Rasmus Stokholm, Peter Larsen, Jan Duedal Rölfing, Juozas Petruskevicius, Morten K Rasmussen, Steffen Skov, Rasmus Elsoe","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Tibial shaft fractures are among the most common lower extremity fractures. Treatment of tibial shaft fractures with intramedullary nailing has become the treatment of choice in adults. However, commonly reported outcomes include knee pain, limitations in activities of daily living and reduction in quality of life (QOL). The literature lacks high-quality studies to document superiority of intramedullary nailing versus other surgical treatment methods. The present study aims to compare the 12-month Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) - sport and recreation activities (sport/rec) after standard intramedullary nailing with external ring fixation for adult patients with isolated tibial shaft fractures.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study is a multicentre randomised, prospective clinical trial. A total of 67 patients will be included in the study, and the primary outcome will be the KOOS-sport/rec at 12 months after surgery.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>With KOOS-sport/rec as the primary outcome, the findings of the present study are expected to advance our understanding of knee pain, function and QOL, regardless of the treatment option and the outcome of the study.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>The project is partially funded by the Independent Research Found Denmark.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong></p><p><strong>Clinicaltrials: </strong>gov ID: NCT-03945669, version 1.1, 21 September 2022.</p>","PeriodicalId":11119,"journal":{"name":"Danish medical journal","volume":"71 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Danish medical journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Tibial shaft fractures are among the most common lower extremity fractures. Treatment of tibial shaft fractures with intramedullary nailing has become the treatment of choice in adults. However, commonly reported outcomes include knee pain, limitations in activities of daily living and reduction in quality of life (QOL). The literature lacks high-quality studies to document superiority of intramedullary nailing versus other surgical treatment methods. The present study aims to compare the 12-month Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) - sport and recreation activities (sport/rec) after standard intramedullary nailing with external ring fixation for adult patients with isolated tibial shaft fractures.

Methods: This study is a multicentre randomised, prospective clinical trial. A total of 67 patients will be included in the study, and the primary outcome will be the KOOS-sport/rec at 12 months after surgery.

Conclusions: With KOOS-sport/rec as the primary outcome, the findings of the present study are expected to advance our understanding of knee pain, function and QOL, regardless of the treatment option and the outcome of the study.

Funding: The project is partially funded by the Independent Research Found Denmark.

Trial registration:

Clinicaltrials: gov ID: NCT-03945669, version 1.1, 21 September 2022.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
髓内钉与环形外固定器治疗胫骨骨折--随机临床试验的研究方案。
简介胫骨轴骨折是最常见的下肢骨折之一。使用髓内钉治疗胫骨干骨折已成为成人的首选治疗方法。然而,通常报告的结果包括膝关节疼痛、日常生活活动受限和生活质量(QOL)下降。文献缺乏高质量的研究来证明髓内钉与其他手术治疗方法的优越性。本研究旨在比较孤立性胫骨干骨折成年患者在标准髓内钉和外环固定后 12 个月的膝关节损伤和骨关节炎结果评分(KOOS)--运动和娱乐活动(sport/rec):本研究是一项多中心随机前瞻性临床试验。方法:该研究是一项多中心随机前瞻性临床试验,共有 67 名患者参与研究,主要结果是术后 12 个月的 KOOS-sport/rec:以KOOS-sport/rec为主要结果,无论治疗方案和研究结果如何,本研究的结果都有望促进我们对膝关节疼痛、功能和QOL的理解:该项目由丹麦独立研究基金会(Independent Research Found Denmark)提供部分资助:试验注册:Clinicaltrials: gov ID:NCT-03945669,1.1 版,2022 年 9 月 21 日。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Danish medical journal
Danish medical journal MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
6.20%
发文量
78
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Danish Medical Journal (DMJ) is a general medical journal. The journal publish original research in English – conducted in or in relation to the Danish health-care system. When writing for the Danish Medical Journal please remember target audience which is the general reader. This means that the research area should be relevant to many readers and the paper should be presented in a way that most readers will understand the content. DMJ will publish the following articles: • Original articles • Protocol articles from large randomized clinical trials • Systematic reviews and meta-analyses • PhD theses from Danish faculties of health sciences • DMSc theses from Danish faculties of health sciences.
期刊最新文献
Compliance with endocrine therapy among breast cancer survivors. Counselling and prescription of contraception related to pregnancy termination. Adrenomedullin in pulmonary hypertension. A novel acute basic palliation concept for patients without specialised palliative needs. Adjuvant steroid to percutaneous needle fasciotomy for Dupuytren's contracture. An RCT study protocol.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1