Stress analysis of horizontal mid-root fracture managed with different intraradicular fixation protocols: A 3D-finite element study

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE European Journal of Oral Sciences Pub Date : 2024-01-18 DOI:10.1111/eos.12971
Neha Jasrasaria, Saumya Johri, Ramesh Bharti, Aseem Prakash Tikku
{"title":"Stress analysis of horizontal mid-root fracture managed with different intraradicular fixation protocols: A 3D-finite element study","authors":"Neha Jasrasaria,&nbsp;Saumya Johri,&nbsp;Ramesh Bharti,&nbsp;Aseem Prakash Tikku","doi":"10.1111/eos.12971","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The current study evaluated the stress distribution in a maxillary central incisor with mid-root fracture after splinting with different intra-radicular posts using 3D-finite element analysis (FEA). Five 3D-FEA models were constructed. Model 1 was an intact tooth with no fracture, Model 2: A tooth with a horizontal mid-root fracture, with no treatment. Model 3: Same as model 2, and intraradicular splinting using fiber post. Model 4: Same as model 2 and intra-radicular splinting using Protaper Gold file F3. Model 5: Same as model 2, and with intraradicular splinting with Ribbond. The FEA of all models was done to obtain the maximum Von-Mises stress in the root canal space, the dentin, the periodontal ligament, and the bone. The highest Von Mises stresses for the root canal space and the dentin were found in Model 3, followed by models 4, 5, and 2, and least in Model 1. The Von Mises stress of the periodontal ligament was the least in model 1. The Von Mises stress of bone was higher in all experimental models than in the baseline model. The results suggest that in cases where intra-radicular splinting is indicated, fiber posts and Ribbond are better alternatives to endodontic files due to the lower stresses exerted.</p>","PeriodicalId":11983,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Oral Sciences","volume":"132 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Oral Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/eos.12971","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The current study evaluated the stress distribution in a maxillary central incisor with mid-root fracture after splinting with different intra-radicular posts using 3D-finite element analysis (FEA). Five 3D-FEA models were constructed. Model 1 was an intact tooth with no fracture, Model 2: A tooth with a horizontal mid-root fracture, with no treatment. Model 3: Same as model 2, and intraradicular splinting using fiber post. Model 4: Same as model 2 and intra-radicular splinting using Protaper Gold file F3. Model 5: Same as model 2, and with intraradicular splinting with Ribbond. The FEA of all models was done to obtain the maximum Von-Mises stress in the root canal space, the dentin, the periodontal ligament, and the bone. The highest Von Mises stresses for the root canal space and the dentin were found in Model 3, followed by models 4, 5, and 2, and least in Model 1. The Von Mises stress of the periodontal ligament was the least in model 1. The Von Mises stress of bone was higher in all experimental models than in the baseline model. The results suggest that in cases where intra-radicular splinting is indicated, fiber posts and Ribbond are better alternatives to endodontic files due to the lower stresses exerted.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
采用不同关节内固定方案处理的水平中根骨折的应力分析:三维有限元研究
本研究使用三维有限元分析(FEA)评估了一颗中根骨折的上颌中切牙在使用不同的根内支柱夹板后的应力分布情况。共构建了五个三维有限元分析模型。模型 1 是一颗没有骨折的完整牙齿,模型 2:一颗牙根中段水平骨折的牙齿,没有进行任何治疗。模型 3:与模型 2 相同,使用纤维桩进行关节内夹板固定。模型 4:与模型 2 相同,使用 Protaper Gold F3 锉进行关节内夹板固定。模型 5:与模型 2 相同,使用 Ribbond 进行关节内夹板固定。对所有模型进行有限元分析,以获得根管间隙、牙本质、牙周韧带和牙槽骨的最大 Von Mises 应力。根管间隙和牙本质的 Von Mises 应力最大的是模型 3,其次是模型 4、5 和 2,模型 1 最小。牙周韧带的 Von Mises 应力在模型 1 中最小。所有实验模型中牙槽骨的 Von Mises 应力都高于基线模型。结果表明,在需要进行椎间夹板固定的情况下,纤维桩和 Ribbond 因其较低的应力而成为牙髓锉的更好替代品。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
European Journal of Oral Sciences
European Journal of Oral Sciences 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
5.30%
发文量
61
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Oral Sciences is an international journal which publishes original research papers within clinical dentistry, on all basic science aspects of structure, chemistry, developmental biology, physiology and pathology of relevant tissues, as well as on microbiology, biomaterials and the behavioural sciences as they relate to dentistry. In general, analytical studies are preferred to descriptive ones. Reviews, Short Communications and Letters to the Editor will also be considered for publication. The journal is published bimonthly.
期刊最新文献
Effects of cross-linking agents on hydroxyproline release and root caries lesion size: Systematic review and network meta-analysis of in vitro studies. Effect of masticatory muscle function on the craniofacial sutures of the anterior viscerocranium in growing rats. Gender variability in palpation performance for temporomandibular disorders with three different methods: An experimental study. Bond strength of resin-based restorative materials to fast-setting calcium silicate cement using different resin adhesive systems. Different adhesive approaches for the bonding of a new universal resin cement to a disilicate glass-ceramic.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1