Development and validation of a reasons for electronic cigarette use questionnaire.

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Experimental and clinical psychopharmacology Pub Date : 2024-08-01 Epub Date: 2024-01-18 DOI:10.1037/pha0000702
David M Ledgerwood, Danishi K Bedi, Mannat K Bedi, Ciara N Cannoy, Krithika Prakash, Alanna E Foulon, ShayLin Excell, Leslie H Lundahl
{"title":"Development and validation of a reasons for electronic cigarette use questionnaire.","authors":"David M Ledgerwood, Danishi K Bedi, Mannat K Bedi, Ciara N Cannoy, Krithika Prakash, Alanna E Foulon, ShayLin Excell, Leslie H Lundahl","doi":"10.1037/pha0000702","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>People use electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes) for many reasons, but currently there are no comprehensive assessments of the motivations for tobacco vaping. The aim of the present study is to develop and test the initial construct validity of a new measure to assess reasons for e-cigarette use. We developed a 56-item measure based on the e-cigarette literature. This measure, along with demographic and tobacco use questions, was administered to adults who self-identified as past or present e-cigarette users on the Prolific crowdsourcing platform. The sample (<i>n</i> = 965) was randomly assigned into two analytic groups for exploratory factor analysis (EFA; <i>n</i> = 484) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA; <i>n</i> = 481). The sample ranged from 19 to 77 (<i>M</i> = 36.6; <i>SD</i> = 11.5) years old, and 42.2% identified as women, 74.6% as White, 7.2% as African American, 4.7% as Asian/Pacific Islander, and 5.1% Hispanic/Latino. After removing highly correlated items and nonloading items on the EFA, the 56-item scale was reduced to 47 items across eight factors. The eight subscales assessing various motivation domains of e-cigarette use included social influence, alternative to cigarettes, pleasurable effects, harm reduction, dependence, cessation, weight/appetite, and smell/flavor domains. Cronbach's α coefficients and preliminary analyses of differential motivation based on sex, age, and daily smoker status are presented. This study demonstrates the construct validity for the first comprehensive measure tested to assess reasons for e-cigarette use. This measure has potential to become a valuable assessment for researchers examining factors contributing to tobacco vaping among a variety of populations and settings. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":12089,"journal":{"name":"Experimental and clinical psychopharmacology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Experimental and clinical psychopharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/pha0000702","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

People use electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes) for many reasons, but currently there are no comprehensive assessments of the motivations for tobacco vaping. The aim of the present study is to develop and test the initial construct validity of a new measure to assess reasons for e-cigarette use. We developed a 56-item measure based on the e-cigarette literature. This measure, along with demographic and tobacco use questions, was administered to adults who self-identified as past or present e-cigarette users on the Prolific crowdsourcing platform. The sample (n = 965) was randomly assigned into two analytic groups for exploratory factor analysis (EFA; n = 484) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA; n = 481). The sample ranged from 19 to 77 (M = 36.6; SD = 11.5) years old, and 42.2% identified as women, 74.6% as White, 7.2% as African American, 4.7% as Asian/Pacific Islander, and 5.1% Hispanic/Latino. After removing highly correlated items and nonloading items on the EFA, the 56-item scale was reduced to 47 items across eight factors. The eight subscales assessing various motivation domains of e-cigarette use included social influence, alternative to cigarettes, pleasurable effects, harm reduction, dependence, cessation, weight/appetite, and smell/flavor domains. Cronbach's α coefficients and preliminary analyses of differential motivation based on sex, age, and daily smoker status are presented. This study demonstrates the construct validity for the first comprehensive measure tested to assess reasons for e-cigarette use. This measure has potential to become a valuable assessment for researchers examining factors contributing to tobacco vaping among a variety of populations and settings. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
电子香烟使用原因问卷的开发与验证。
人们使用电子烟(电子烟)的原因很多,但目前还没有对吸烟动机的全面评估。本研究的目的是开发和测试一种新的评估电子烟使用原因的方法的初步构建有效性。我们在电子烟文献的基础上开发了56个项目的测量方法。我们在 Prolific 众包平台上对自我认同为过去或现在的电子烟用户的成年人施测了该测量方法以及人口统计学和烟草使用问题。样本(n = 965)被随机分配到两个分析组,分别进行探索性因子分析(EFA;n = 484)和确认性因子分析(CFA;n = 481)。样本年龄从 19 岁到 77 岁(M = 36.6;SD = 11.5)不等,42.2% 为女性,74.6% 为白人,7.2% 为非裔美国人,4.7% 为亚太裔美国人,5.1% 为西班牙裔/拉丁美洲人。在去除 EFA 中的高相关性项目和非负荷项目后,56 个项目的量表缩减为 47 个项目,涵盖 8 个因子。评估电子烟使用动机各领域的八个分量表包括社会影响、香烟替代品、愉悦效果、减害、依赖、戒烟、体重/食欲和气味/风味领域。本研究给出了 Cronbach's α 系数,并初步分析了基于性别、年龄和日常吸烟状况的不同动机。这项研究证明了首个用于评估电子烟使用原因的综合测量方法的建构有效性。对于研究人员在不同人群和环境中研究导致吸食烟草的因素而言,该测量方法有可能成为一种有价值的评估方法。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA,保留所有权利)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
8.70%
发文量
164
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology publishes advances in translational and interdisciplinary research on psychopharmacology, broadly defined, and/or substance abuse.
期刊最新文献
Evaluating the human abuse potential of concurrent use of electronic cigarettes and low nicotine cigarettes among adults who smoke. Residual next-day effects of alprazolam on psychomotor performance and simulated driving in healthy normal adults. Efficacy and safety of balovaptan for posttraumatic stress disorder: A randomized, placebo-controlled trial. A behavioral choice analysis of the role of life events during early nonabstinent natural recovery from alcohol use disorder. An experimental investigation into the impact of acute stress on alcohol craving.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1