Progress and challenges in intravesical drug delivery.

Expert opinion on drug delivery Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-01-31 DOI:10.1080/17425247.2024.2307481
Arpita Banerjee, Dongtak Lee, Christopher Jiang, Rong Wang, Zoe Bogusia Kutulakos, Sohyung Lee, Jingjing Gao, Nitin Joshi
{"title":"Progress and challenges in intravesical drug delivery.","authors":"Arpita Banerjee, Dongtak Lee, Christopher Jiang, Rong Wang, Zoe Bogusia Kutulakos, Sohyung Lee, Jingjing Gao, Nitin Joshi","doi":"10.1080/17425247.2024.2307481","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Intravesical drug delivery (IDD) has gained recognition as a viable approach for treating bladder-related diseases over the years. However, it comes with its set of challenges, including voiding difficulties and limitations in mucosal and epithelial penetration. These challenges lead to drug dilution and clearance, resulting in poor efficacy. Various strategies for drug delivery have been devised to overcome these issues, all aimed at optimizing drug delivery. Nevertheless, there has been minimal translation to clinical settings.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>This review provides a detailed description of IDD, including its history, advantages, and challenges. It also explores the physical barriers encountered in IDD, such as voiding, mucosal penetration, and epithelial penetration, and discusses current strategies for overcoming these challenges. Additionally, it offers a comprehensive roadmap for advancing IDD into clinical trials.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>Physical bladder barriers and limitations of conventional treatments result in unsatisfactory efficacy against bladder diseases. Nevertheless, substantial recent efforts in this field have led to significant progress in overcoming these challenges and have raised important attributes for an optimal IDD system. However, there is still a lack of well-defined steps in the workflow to optimize the IDD system for clinical settings, and further research is required to establish more comprehensive in vitro and in vivo models to expedite clinical translation.</p>","PeriodicalId":94004,"journal":{"name":"Expert opinion on drug delivery","volume":" ","pages":"111-129"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert opinion on drug delivery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17425247.2024.2307481","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Intravesical drug delivery (IDD) has gained recognition as a viable approach for treating bladder-related diseases over the years. However, it comes with its set of challenges, including voiding difficulties and limitations in mucosal and epithelial penetration. These challenges lead to drug dilution and clearance, resulting in poor efficacy. Various strategies for drug delivery have been devised to overcome these issues, all aimed at optimizing drug delivery. Nevertheless, there has been minimal translation to clinical settings.

Areas covered: This review provides a detailed description of IDD, including its history, advantages, and challenges. It also explores the physical barriers encountered in IDD, such as voiding, mucosal penetration, and epithelial penetration, and discusses current strategies for overcoming these challenges. Additionally, it offers a comprehensive roadmap for advancing IDD into clinical trials.

Expert opinion: Physical bladder barriers and limitations of conventional treatments result in unsatisfactory efficacy against bladder diseases. Nevertheless, substantial recent efforts in this field have led to significant progress in overcoming these challenges and have raised important attributes for an optimal IDD system. However, there is still a lack of well-defined steps in the workflow to optimize the IDD system for clinical settings, and further research is required to establish more comprehensive in vitro and in vivo models to expedite clinical translation.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
膀胱内给药的进展与挑战。
导言:多年来,膀胱内给药(IDD)作为治疗膀胱相关疾病的一种可行方法得到了广泛认可。然而,它也面临着一系列挑战,包括排尿困难以及粘膜和上皮渗透的局限性。这些挑战会导致药物稀释和清除,从而导致疗效不佳。为了克服这些问题,人们设计了各种给药策略,目的都是为了优化给药效果。尽管如此,将其应用于临床的情况却少之又少:本综述详细介绍了 IDD,包括其历史、优势和挑战。它还探讨了 IDD 遇到的物理障碍,如排空、粘膜穿透和上皮穿透,并讨论了克服这些挑战的当前策略。此外,它还为将 IDD 推向临床试验提供了全面的路线图:膀胱物理障碍和传统治疗方法的局限性导致膀胱疾病的疗效不尽如人意。尽管如此,最近在这一领域所做的大量努力已在克服这些挑战方面取得了重大进展,并提出了最佳 IDD 系统的重要属性。然而,在工作流程中仍然缺乏明确的步骤来优化 IDD 系统,使其适用于临床环境,还需要进一步的研究来建立更全面的体外和体内模型,以加快临床转化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
An opinion on advanced cancer immunotherapy through innovations in PD-1 inhibitor delivery systems. Acceptability of Cyltezo pen among biologics autoinjector patients, autoinjector naïve patients, and healthcare professionals. The potential of nanosystems in disrupting adenosine signaling pathways for tumor immunotherapy. How can nanoemulsions be used for photosensitizer drug delivery? Advanced drug delivery strategies for diabetic retinopathy: a comprehensive review on current medications, delivery methods, device innovations, overcoming barriers, and experimental models.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1