[Motives of patients presenting independently at the emergency department-a prospective monocentric observational study].

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Medizinische Klinik-Intensivmedizin Und Notfallmedizin Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-01-17 DOI:10.1007/s00063-024-01106-2
Katharina Sitter, Mareen Braunstein, Markus Wörnle
{"title":"[Motives of patients presenting independently at the emergency department-a prospective monocentric observational study].","authors":"Katharina Sitter, Mareen Braunstein, Markus Wörnle","doi":"10.1007/s00063-024-01106-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In the ongoing professional, societal, and political discussion, the hypothesis is repeatedly put forward that a large portion of patients who independently visit the emergency department could also be treated in other care settings such as by a general practitioner, the statutory medical on-call service, or in emergency clinics. Various reasons are cited for why these alternative care settings are not utilized in these cases.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study investigates the motives of patients who presented independently at the emergency department, as well as the socio-demographic parameters of this study cohort.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The survey was carried out as part of a prospective monocentric observational study of internal medicine patients at a university emergency department.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1086 patients were included in the study. In total, 33% of the study participants visited the emergency department based on a physician's recommendation or referral instead of opting for an alternative care option. The main reason for visiting the emergency department was the subjectively assessed urgency of their symptoms. Among the patients who presented independently at the emergency department, 28% required further inpatient care during the course of treatment. Awareness of alternative care pathways, such as utilizing emergency medical services, seeking care from the statutory medical on-call service, or visiting an emergency clinic, was low.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Emergency departments remain an important point of contact for patients who present there independently, without being brought by emergency medical services. The motives behind why patients choose a visit to the emergency department over treatment in an alternative care setting vary. If alternatives are to be used instead of emergency departments, structures first need to be established or expanded.</p>","PeriodicalId":49019,"journal":{"name":"Medizinische Klinik-Intensivmedizin Und Notfallmedizin","volume":" ","pages":"546-557"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11461550/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medizinische Klinik-Intensivmedizin Und Notfallmedizin","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00063-024-01106-2","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: In the ongoing professional, societal, and political discussion, the hypothesis is repeatedly put forward that a large portion of patients who independently visit the emergency department could also be treated in other care settings such as by a general practitioner, the statutory medical on-call service, or in emergency clinics. Various reasons are cited for why these alternative care settings are not utilized in these cases.

Objectives: This study investigates the motives of patients who presented independently at the emergency department, as well as the socio-demographic parameters of this study cohort.

Materials and methods: The survey was carried out as part of a prospective monocentric observational study of internal medicine patients at a university emergency department.

Results: A total of 1086 patients were included in the study. In total, 33% of the study participants visited the emergency department based on a physician's recommendation or referral instead of opting for an alternative care option. The main reason for visiting the emergency department was the subjectively assessed urgency of their symptoms. Among the patients who presented independently at the emergency department, 28% required further inpatient care during the course of treatment. Awareness of alternative care pathways, such as utilizing emergency medical services, seeking care from the statutory medical on-call service, or visiting an emergency clinic, was low.

Conclusions: Emergency departments remain an important point of contact for patients who present there independently, without being brought by emergency medical services. The motives behind why patients choose a visit to the emergency department over treatment in an alternative care setting vary. If alternatives are to be used instead of emergency departments, structures first need to be established or expanded.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[急诊科独立就诊患者的动机--一项前瞻性单中心观察研究]。
背景:在持续不断的专业、社会和政治讨论中,人们一再提出这样的假设,即大部分独立前往急诊科就诊的患者也可以在其他医疗机构接受治疗,如全科医生、法定医疗值班服务或急诊诊所。在这些情况下,没有使用这些替代性医疗机构的原因有很多:本研究调查了独立前往急诊科就诊的患者的动机,以及该研究群体的社会人口学参数:调查是一项前瞻性单中心观察研究的一部分,对象是一所大学急诊科的内科病人:研究共纳入了 1086 名患者。总共有 33% 的研究参与者是根据医生的建议或转诊到急诊科就诊的,而不是选择其他治疗方案。到急诊科就诊的主要原因是主观评估的症状紧急程度。在独立前往急诊科就诊的患者中,有 28% 在治疗过程中需要进一步住院治疗。人们对其他治疗途径的认识很低,如利用急诊医疗服务、寻求法定医疗值班服务或到急诊诊所就诊:急诊科仍然是独立就诊病人的重要接触点,这些病人并不是由急诊医疗服务带来的。患者选择到急诊科就诊而不是在其他医疗机构接受治疗的动机各不相同。如果要使用其他方式代替急诊科,首先需要建立或扩大相关机构。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
9.10%
发文量
93
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Medizinische Klinik – Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin is an internationally respected interdisciplinary journal. It is intended for physicians, nurses, respiratory and physical therapists active in intensive care and accident/emergency units, but also for internists, anesthesiologists, surgeons, neurologists, and pediatricians with special interest in intensive care medicine. Comprehensive reviews describe the most recent advances in the field of internal medicine with special focus on intensive care problems. Freely submitted original articles present important studies in this discipline and promote scientific exchange, while articles in the category Photo essay feature interesting cases and aim at optimizing diagnostic and therapeutic strategies. In the rubric journal club well-respected experts comment on outstanding international publications. Review articles under the rubric "Continuing Medical Education" present verified results of scientific research and their integration into daily practice. The rubrics "Nursing practice" and "Physical therapy" round out the information.
期刊最新文献
Clinical characteristics and BGA-optimized pretest probability of pulmonary embolism in the elderly. Evaluation of the predictive value of the glucose-to-potassium ratio in predicting in-hospital mortality of patients with sepsis and septic shock. [Challenges in neuroprognostication after extracorporeal membrane oxygenation]. [Early mobilization in the intensive care unit for patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage-a review]. [Acute ischemic stroke treatment].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1