Miss or match? The impact of PhD training on job market satisfaction

IF 7.5 1区 管理学 Q1 MANAGEMENT Research Policy Pub Date : 2024-01-18 DOI:10.1016/j.respol.2023.104945
Cornelia Lawson , Cindy Lopes-Bento
{"title":"Miss or match? The impact of PhD training on job market satisfaction","authors":"Cornelia Lawson ,&nbsp;Cindy Lopes-Bento","doi":"10.1016/j.respol.2023.104945","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Job satisfaction is vital to being productive and to contribute to society. This paper adds to our current understanding of the job market for academics by investigating job satisfaction of PhD holders leaving academia for the private or non-academic public sector (government, public administration) compared to those who remain in university or public research center positions. We investigate whether a PhD matters for satisfaction by comparing PhD holders and PhD dropouts who hold similar motivations and ‘taste’ for science. Empirically we rely on a unique survey of PhD grant applicants (funded and not) and show that about half of PhD graduates leave academia. In endogenous treatment effects models accounting for selection into sector, we find that despite a preference for the academic sector, PhDs do not experience lower job satisfaction when employed outside of academia and that overall satisfaction is highest in the non-academic public sector. We further find that PhD graduates are happier in their jobs than those that do not complete a PhD, a finding that is mediated by the job content (i.e. the relatedness of the employment to a research activity). These findings are of relevance to employers and policy makers, as they inform about job match of graduates and the value of pursuing a PhD across employment sectors.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48466,"journal":{"name":"Research Policy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":7.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048733323002299/pdfft?md5=16d90638f86ae7d33fcd1f8b33d66e39&pid=1-s2.0-S0048733323002299-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research Policy","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048733323002299","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Job satisfaction is vital to being productive and to contribute to society. This paper adds to our current understanding of the job market for academics by investigating job satisfaction of PhD holders leaving academia for the private or non-academic public sector (government, public administration) compared to those who remain in university or public research center positions. We investigate whether a PhD matters for satisfaction by comparing PhD holders and PhD dropouts who hold similar motivations and ‘taste’ for science. Empirically we rely on a unique survey of PhD grant applicants (funded and not) and show that about half of PhD graduates leave academia. In endogenous treatment effects models accounting for selection into sector, we find that despite a preference for the academic sector, PhDs do not experience lower job satisfaction when employed outside of academia and that overall satisfaction is highest in the non-academic public sector. We further find that PhD graduates are happier in their jobs than those that do not complete a PhD, a finding that is mediated by the job content (i.e. the relatedness of the employment to a research activity). These findings are of relevance to employers and policy makers, as they inform about job match of graduates and the value of pursuing a PhD across employment sectors.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
错过还是匹配?博士培训对就业市场满意度的影响
工作满意度对于提高生产力和贡献社会至关重要。本文通过调查离开学术界前往私营或非学术公共部门(政府、公共管理部门)工作的博士生与留在大学或公共研究中心工作的博士生相比的工作满意度,加深了我们目前对学术界就业市场的了解。我们通过比较博士生和辍学博士生的工作满意度,研究博士生是否对工作满意度有影响,因为他们的工作动机和对科学的 "品味 "相似。在实证方面,我们依靠对博士生基金申请者(受资助和未受资助)的独特调查,结果显示约有一半的博士毕业生离开了学术界。在考虑了部门选择的内生处理效应模型中,我们发现,尽管博士们偏好学术部门,但他们在学术界以外就业时的工作满意度并不低,而且非学术公共部门的总体满意度最高。我们还发现,博士毕业生比未完成博士学位的毕业生更乐于工作,这一发现受工作内容(即工作与研究活动的相关性)的影响。这些发现对雇主和政策制定者具有重要意义,因为它们为毕业生的工作匹配以及在不同就业部门攻读博士学位的价值提供了信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Research Policy
Research Policy MANAGEMENT-
CiteScore
12.80
自引率
6.90%
发文量
182
期刊介绍: Research Policy (RP) articles explore the interaction between innovation, technology, or research, and economic, social, political, and organizational processes, both empirically and theoretically. All RP papers are expected to provide insights with implications for policy or management. Research Policy (RP) is a multidisciplinary journal focused on analyzing, understanding, and effectively addressing the challenges posed by innovation, technology, R&D, and science. This includes activities related to knowledge creation, diffusion, acquisition, and exploitation in the form of new or improved products, processes, or services, across economic, policy, management, organizational, and environmental dimensions.
期刊最新文献
Everyone steps back? The widespread retraction of crowd-funding support for minority creators when migration fear is high The Nobel “Pride” Phenomenon: An analysis of Nobel Prize discoveries and their recognition Adapting to policy changes: How firms' R&D responses affect their performance Family CEO and radical innovation: A stewardship perspective Culture of impact in agricultural research organisations: What for and how?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1