Assessing the Greenness and Environmental Friendliness of Analytical Methods: Modern Approaches and Recent Computational Programs.

IF 4.2 2区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL Critical reviews in analytical chemistry Pub Date : 2024-01-19 DOI:10.1080/10408347.2024.2304552
Farah Abdulraouf Semysim, Barakat Kareem Hussain, Maha Abbas Hussien, Ebaa Adnan Azooz, Denys Snigur
{"title":"Assessing the Greenness and Environmental Friendliness of Analytical Methods: Modern Approaches and Recent Computational Programs.","authors":"Farah Abdulraouf Semysim, Barakat Kareem Hussain, Maha Abbas Hussien, Ebaa Adnan Azooz, Denys Snigur","doi":"10.1080/10408347.2024.2304552","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Environmental measures have drawn more attention recently as a means of identifying cost-effective, safe, and green approaches in analytical methods. As a result, white and green analytical chemistry was developed. Greenness, whiteness, and chemical risks are all measured under the general expression \"environmental measurements.\" For the first time, the greenness, whiteness, and chemical risk-measuring programs are presented along with their histories, concepts, advantages, and disadvantages. The six scales that were published between 2020 and 2023, including the Analytical Greenness Calculator (AGREE), the Analytical Greenness Metric for Sample Preparation (AGREEprep), the Complementary Green Analytical Procedure Index (ComplexGAPI), Red-Green-Blue (RGB12), blue applicability grade index (BAGI), and the Chloroform-oriented Toxicity Estimation (ChlorTox) scales are discussed. Also, the applications of several analytical methods have been compared. Lastly, patterns for the future were suggested. We hope this review is helpful for analysts to stay up-to-date with recent greenness, whiteness, and chemical risk scales. Additionally, the most appropriate procedure has been chosen, applied, and compared easily.</p>","PeriodicalId":10744,"journal":{"name":"Critical reviews in analytical chemistry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical reviews in analytical chemistry","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10408347.2024.2304552","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Environmental measures have drawn more attention recently as a means of identifying cost-effective, safe, and green approaches in analytical methods. As a result, white and green analytical chemistry was developed. Greenness, whiteness, and chemical risks are all measured under the general expression "environmental measurements." For the first time, the greenness, whiteness, and chemical risk-measuring programs are presented along with their histories, concepts, advantages, and disadvantages. The six scales that were published between 2020 and 2023, including the Analytical Greenness Calculator (AGREE), the Analytical Greenness Metric for Sample Preparation (AGREEprep), the Complementary Green Analytical Procedure Index (ComplexGAPI), Red-Green-Blue (RGB12), blue applicability grade index (BAGI), and the Chloroform-oriented Toxicity Estimation (ChlorTox) scales are discussed. Also, the applications of several analytical methods have been compared. Lastly, patterns for the future were suggested. We hope this review is helpful for analysts to stay up-to-date with recent greenness, whiteness, and chemical risk scales. Additionally, the most appropriate procedure has been chosen, applied, and compared easily.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估分析方法的绿色环保性:现代方法和最新计算程序。
最近,环保措施作为确定分析方法中具有成本效益、安全和绿色方法的一种手段,引起了越来越多的关注。因此,白色和绿色分析化学应运而生。绿色、白色和化学风险都是在 "环境测量 "的一般表述下进行测量的。本书首次介绍了绿色、白色和化学风险测量项目及其历史、概念、优点和缺点。此外,还讨论了 2020 年至 2023 年间发布的六个量表,包括分析绿度计算器(AGREE)、样品制备分析绿度指标(AGREEprep)、绿色分析程序互补指数(ComplexGAPI)、红绿蓝(RGB12)、蓝色适用性等级指数(BAGI)和以氯仿为导向的毒性估算(ChlorTox)量表。此外,还对几种分析方法的应用进行了比较。最后,提出了未来的发展模式。我们希望这篇综述能帮助分析人员了解最新的绿度、白度和化学风险量表。此外,选择、应用和比较最合适的程序也很容易。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.00
自引率
4.00%
发文量
137
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Critical Reviews in Analytical Chemistry continues to be a dependable resource for both the expert and the student by providing in-depth, scholarly, insightful reviews of important topics within the discipline of analytical chemistry and related measurement sciences. The journal exclusively publishes review articles that illuminate the underlying science, that evaluate the field''s status by putting recent developments into proper perspective and context, and that speculate on possible future developments. A limited number of articles are of a "tutorial" format written by experts for scientists seeking introduction or clarification in a new area. This journal serves as a forum for linking various underlying components in broad and interdisciplinary means, while maintaining balance between applied and fundamental research. Topics we are interested in receiving reviews on are the following: · chemical analysis; · instrumentation; · chemometrics; · analytical biochemistry; · medicinal analysis; · forensics; · environmental sciences; · applied physics; · and material science.
期刊最新文献
Comprehensive Application and Prospects of Surface-Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy in Natural Product Research. Electroanalysis of Statin Drugs: A Review on the Electrochemical Sensor Architectures Ranging from Classical to Modern Systems. Application Progress of Stable Isotope Dilution Analysis in Volatile Flavor Analysis of Food. Recent Advances in the Quantitative Determination of Protein Receptor-Ligand Interaction Kinetics. Unraveling the Metabolomics Mysteries in Camellia Oil: From Cognition to Application.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1