Effectiveness of Topical Ozone Gel Application in the Management of Postextraction Wound Healing: An In Vivo Study.

Lin Jacob Varghese, Banibrata Lahiri, Narendra Varma Penumatsa, Crystal Runa Soans, Aswini Sekar, Fazil Arshad Nasyam
{"title":"Effectiveness of Topical Ozone Gel Application in the Management of Postextraction Wound Healing: An <i>In Vivo</i> Study.","authors":"Lin Jacob Varghese, Banibrata Lahiri, Narendra Varma Penumatsa, Crystal Runa Soans, Aswini Sekar, Fazil Arshad Nasyam","doi":"10.5005/jp-journals-10024-3557","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>The purpose of the current study was to determine the effectiveness of topical ozone gel application in the management of postextraction wound healing.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The current study involved a total of 40 participants. The patients were randomly placed into two groups with sample size estimated as <i>n</i> = 20 in each group. Group A: Control: patients received only saline irrigation and group B: patients receiving topical ozone gel. The surgical procedure was standardized for all groups, and local anesthesia was used during the procedure. After the removal of the mandibular third molar, the control group irrigated the socket with saline, whereas in the study group, the socket was filled with ozone gel. On the first, third, fifth, and seventh postoperative days, a single examiner evaluated each participant for postoperative mouth opening, discomfort, and patient satisfaction. The <i>t</i>-test was used to analyze quantitative data, whereas the Fisher exact test was employed to analyze qualitative data. Statistical significance was defined as a <i>p</i> value less than 0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>On comparison of patient satisfaction, in the ozone gel group, 13 patients were very satisfied but in the control group, 8 patients were very satisfied. On comparison of pain intensity, on the 5th day, the complete absence of pain patients was more in the ozone gel group (12 patients) compared with the control group (4 patients). There was a statistically significant difference found between these two groups (<i>p</i> < 0.001). On comparison of mouth opening, on the 3rd and 5th day, mouth opening was better in the ozone gel group (29.22 ± 1.28 and 34.06 ± 0.09) compared with the control group (27.38 ± 1.03 and 31.14 ± 0.82), respectively. And there was a statistically significant difference found between these two groups (<i>p</i> < 0.001) on both the days.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The current study came to the conclusion that using ozone gel significantly improves postoperative pain, mouth opening range, and promotes faster wound healing.</p><p><strong>Clinical significance: </strong>The primary goals of postoperative care for exodontia patients have always been pain management and infection control. The most frequent postoperative consequences are pain and edema. Hence, ozone therapy can be used as an effective topical agent to manage postextraction pain and swelling in healthy patients without the need for excess medications. How to cite this article: Varghese LJ, Lahiri B, Penumatsa NV, <i>et al</i>. Effectiveness of Topical Ozone Gel Application in the Management of Postextraction Wound Healing: An <i>In Vivo</i> Study. J Contemp Dent Pract 2023;24(11):887-890.</p>","PeriodicalId":35792,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10024-3557","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: The purpose of the current study was to determine the effectiveness of topical ozone gel application in the management of postextraction wound healing.

Materials and methods: The current study involved a total of 40 participants. The patients were randomly placed into two groups with sample size estimated as n = 20 in each group. Group A: Control: patients received only saline irrigation and group B: patients receiving topical ozone gel. The surgical procedure was standardized for all groups, and local anesthesia was used during the procedure. After the removal of the mandibular third molar, the control group irrigated the socket with saline, whereas in the study group, the socket was filled with ozone gel. On the first, third, fifth, and seventh postoperative days, a single examiner evaluated each participant for postoperative mouth opening, discomfort, and patient satisfaction. The t-test was used to analyze quantitative data, whereas the Fisher exact test was employed to analyze qualitative data. Statistical significance was defined as a p value less than 0.05.

Results: On comparison of patient satisfaction, in the ozone gel group, 13 patients were very satisfied but in the control group, 8 patients were very satisfied. On comparison of pain intensity, on the 5th day, the complete absence of pain patients was more in the ozone gel group (12 patients) compared with the control group (4 patients). There was a statistically significant difference found between these two groups (p < 0.001). On comparison of mouth opening, on the 3rd and 5th day, mouth opening was better in the ozone gel group (29.22 ± 1.28 and 34.06 ± 0.09) compared with the control group (27.38 ± 1.03 and 31.14 ± 0.82), respectively. And there was a statistically significant difference found between these two groups (p < 0.001) on both the days.

Conclusion: The current study came to the conclusion that using ozone gel significantly improves postoperative pain, mouth opening range, and promotes faster wound healing.

Clinical significance: The primary goals of postoperative care for exodontia patients have always been pain management and infection control. The most frequent postoperative consequences are pain and edema. Hence, ozone therapy can be used as an effective topical agent to manage postextraction pain and swelling in healthy patients without the need for excess medications. How to cite this article: Varghese LJ, Lahiri B, Penumatsa NV, et al. Effectiveness of Topical Ozone Gel Application in the Management of Postextraction Wound Healing: An In Vivo Study. J Contemp Dent Pract 2023;24(11):887-890.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
局部应用臭氧凝胶在处理拔牙后伤口愈合中的效果:体内研究
目的:本研究旨在确定局部使用臭氧凝胶治疗拔牙后伤口愈合的有效性:本次研究共有 40 名参与者。患者被随机分为两组,每组样本量估计为 n = 20。A 组对照组:患者只接受生理盐水冲洗;B 组:患者接受局部臭氧凝胶治疗。所有组的手术过程都是标准化的,并在手术过程中使用局部麻醉。拔除下颌第三磨牙后,对照组用生理盐水冲洗牙槽窝,而研究组则用臭氧凝胶填充牙槽窝。术后第一天、第三天、第五天和第七天,由一名检查人员对每位受试者的术后张口情况、不适感和患者满意度进行评估。定量数据采用 t 检验,定性数据采用 Fisher 精确检验。统计显著性定义为 p 值小于 0.05:在患者满意度比较中,臭氧凝胶组有 13 名患者非常满意,而对照组有 8 名患者非常满意。在疼痛强度比较方面,臭氧凝胶组(12 名患者)与对照组(4 名患者)相比,在第 5 天完全无痛的患者更多。两组之间的差异具有统计学意义(P < 0.001)。在张口情况的比较中,臭氧凝胶组在第 3 天和第 5 天的张口情况(29.22 ± 1.28 和 34.06 ± 0.09)分别优于对照组(27.38 ± 1.03 和 31.14 ± 0.82)。结论:本研究得出的结论是,使用臭氧凝胶可明显改善术后疼痛、张口范围,并促进伤口快速愈合:临床意义:牙外翻患者术后护理的主要目标一直是疼痛控制和感染控制。术后最常见的后果是疼痛和水肿。因此,臭氧疗法可作为一种有效的局部用药,用于控制健康患者拔牙后的疼痛和肿胀,而无需过多使用药物。如何引用本文:Varghese LJ, Lahiri B, Penumatsa NV, et al:体内研究。J Contemp Dent Pract 2023;24(11):887-890.
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice
Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice Dentistry-Dentistry (all)
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
174
期刊介绍: The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice (JCDP), is a peer-reviewed, open access MEDLINE indexed journal. The journal’s full text is available online at http://www.thejcdp.com. The journal allows free access (open access) to its contents. Articles with clinical relevance will be given preference for publication. The Journal publishes original research papers, review articles, rare and novel case reports, and clinical techniques. Manuscripts are invited from all specialties of dentistry i.e., conservative dentistry and endodontics, dentofacial orthopedics and orthodontics, oral medicine and radiology, oral pathology, oral surgery, orodental diseases, pediatric dentistry, implantology, periodontics, clinical aspects of public health dentistry, and prosthodontics.
期刊最新文献
Bibliometric Analysis of Botulinum Toxin and Bruxism: Impact, Visualization, and Collaborative Networks. Comparative Evaluation of Antimicrobial Efficacy of Silver Nanoparticles Infused with Azadirachta indica Extract and Chlorhexidine Against Red-complex Pathogens. Comparative Evaluation of Platelet-rich Fibrin and Treated Dentin Matrix in Regenerative Endodontic Treatment of Nonvital Immature Permanent Teeth: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Comparison of Direct Intraoral Scan and Traditional Impression for CAD/CAM Mandibular Overdenture Base: RCT on Peri-implant Marginal Bone Changes. Comparison of Khoury's Bone Shell Technique vs Titanium-reinforced Polytetrafluoroethylene Membrane for 3D-bone Augmentation in Atrophic Posterior Mandible: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1