Trajectories of sleep duration and quality and their association with mild cognitive impairment, frailty, and all-cause mortality

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Sleep Health Pub Date : 2024-04-01 DOI:10.1016/j.sleh.2023.12.002
Aarón Salinas-Rodríguez MSc , Betty Manrique-Espinoza PhD , Karla Moreno-Tamayo PhD , Selene Guerrero-Zúñiga MD
{"title":"Trajectories of sleep duration and quality and their association with mild cognitive impairment, frailty, and all-cause mortality","authors":"Aarón Salinas-Rodríguez MSc ,&nbsp;Betty Manrique-Espinoza PhD ,&nbsp;Karla Moreno-Tamayo PhD ,&nbsp;Selene Guerrero-Zúñiga MD","doi":"10.1016/j.sleh.2023.12.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>To identify longitudinal trajectories of sleep duration<span> and quality and estimate their association with mild cognitive impairment<span>, frailty, and all-cause mortality.</span></span></p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We used data from three waves (2009, 2014, 2017) of the WHO Study on Global Aging and Adult Health in Mexico. The sample consisted of 2722 adults aged 50 and over. Sleep duration and quality were assessed by self-report. Sleep trajectories were determined by applying growth mixture models. Mixed-effects logistic (mild cognitive impairment) and ordinal logistic (frailty), and Cox proportional hazards (all-cause mortality) models were fitted.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p><span><span>Three classes for sleep duration (“optimal-stable,” “long-increasing,” and “short-decreasing”) and quality (“very good-increasing,” “very good-decreasing,” and “moderate/poor stable”) were identified. Compared to the optimal-stable group, the long-increasing trajectory had greater odds for </span>mild cognitive impairment (odds ratio</span> <!-->=<!--> <!-->1.68, 95% CI: 1.01-2.78) and frailty (odds ratio<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->1.66, 95% CI: 1.13-2.46), and higher risk for all-cause mortality (hazard ratio<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->1.91, 95% CI: 1.14-3.19); and the short-decreasing class had a higher probability of frailty (odds ratio<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->1.83, 95% CI: 1.26-2.64). Regarding the sleep quality, the moderate/poor stable trajectory had higher odds of frailty (odds ratio<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->1.71, 95% CI: 1.18-2.47) than very good-increasing group.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>These results have important implications for clinical practice and public health policies<span><span>, given that the evaluation and treatment<span> of sleep disorders need more attention in primary care settings. Interventions to detect and treat sleep disorders should be integrated into clinical practice to prevent or delay the appearance of alterations in older adults' physical and cognitive function. Further research on sleep quality and duration is warranted to understand their contribution to </span></span>healthy aging.</span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":48545,"journal":{"name":"Sleep Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sleep Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352721823003029","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

To identify longitudinal trajectories of sleep duration and quality and estimate their association with mild cognitive impairment, frailty, and all-cause mortality.

Methods

We used data from three waves (2009, 2014, 2017) of the WHO Study on Global Aging and Adult Health in Mexico. The sample consisted of 2722 adults aged 50 and over. Sleep duration and quality were assessed by self-report. Sleep trajectories were determined by applying growth mixture models. Mixed-effects logistic (mild cognitive impairment) and ordinal logistic (frailty), and Cox proportional hazards (all-cause mortality) models were fitted.

Results

Three classes for sleep duration (“optimal-stable,” “long-increasing,” and “short-decreasing”) and quality (“very good-increasing,” “very good-decreasing,” and “moderate/poor stable”) were identified. Compared to the optimal-stable group, the long-increasing trajectory had greater odds for mild cognitive impairment (odds ratio = 1.68, 95% CI: 1.01-2.78) and frailty (odds ratio = 1.66, 95% CI: 1.13-2.46), and higher risk for all-cause mortality (hazard ratio = 1.91, 95% CI: 1.14-3.19); and the short-decreasing class had a higher probability of frailty (odds ratio = 1.83, 95% CI: 1.26-2.64). Regarding the sleep quality, the moderate/poor stable trajectory had higher odds of frailty (odds ratio = 1.71, 95% CI: 1.18-2.47) than very good-increasing group.

Conclusions

These results have important implications for clinical practice and public health policies, given that the evaluation and treatment of sleep disorders need more attention in primary care settings. Interventions to detect and treat sleep disorders should be integrated into clinical practice to prevent or delay the appearance of alterations in older adults' physical and cognitive function. Further research on sleep quality and duration is warranted to understand their contribution to healthy aging.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
睡眠时间和质量的轨迹及其与轻度认知障碍、虚弱和全因死亡率的关系。
目的:确定睡眠时间和质量的纵向轨迹,并估计其与轻度认知障碍、体弱和全因死亡率的关系:确定睡眠时间和质量的纵向轨迹,并估计其与轻度认知障碍、虚弱和全因死亡率的关系:我们使用了世界卫生组织在墨西哥开展的全球老龄化与成人健康研究的三次波次(2009 年、2014 年、2017 年)的数据。样本包括 2722 名 50 岁及以上的成年人。睡眠时间和质量通过自我报告进行评估。睡眠轨迹由生长混合模型确定。混合效应逻辑模型(轻度认知障碍)和顺序逻辑模型(虚弱)以及 Cox 比例危险模型(全因死亡率)均已拟合:确定了三个睡眠时间等级("最佳-稳定"、"长期-增加 "和 "短期-减少")和睡眠质量等级("非常好-增加"、"非常好-减少 "和 "中度/差-稳定")。与最佳稳定组相比,长期递增组出现轻度认知障碍(几率比=1.68,95% CI:1.01-2.78)和虚弱(几率比=1.66,95% CI:1.13-2.46)的几率更大,全因死亡风险更高(危险比=1.91,95% CI:1.14-3.19);短期递减组出现虚弱的几率更高(几率比=1.83,95% CI:1.26-2.64)。在睡眠质量方面,中度/差的稳定轨迹比非常好的增加组有更高的虚弱几率(几率比=1.71,95% CI:1.18-2.47):这些结果对临床实践和公共卫生政策具有重要意义,因为睡眠障碍的评估和治疗需要在初级保健中得到更多关注。应将检测和治疗睡眠障碍的干预措施纳入临床实践,以预防或延缓老年人身体和认知功能的改变。有必要对睡眠质量和持续时间进行进一步研究,以了解它们对健康老龄化的贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Sleep Health
Sleep Health CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
9.80%
发文量
114
审稿时长
54 days
期刊介绍: Sleep Health Journal of the National Sleep Foundation is a multidisciplinary journal that explores sleep''s role in population health and elucidates the social science perspective on sleep and health. Aligned with the National Sleep Foundation''s global authoritative, evidence-based voice for sleep health, the journal serves as the foremost publication for manuscripts that advance the sleep health of all members of society.The scope of the journal extends across diverse sleep-related fields, including anthropology, education, health services research, human development, international health, law, mental health, nursing, nutrition, psychology, public health, public policy, fatigue management, transportation, social work, and sociology. The journal welcomes original research articles, review articles, brief reports, special articles, letters to the editor, editorials, and commentaries.
期刊最新文献
Sleep health characteristics and positive mental health in Canadian youth: A cross-sectional analysis of the Health Behaviour in School-aged Children study. Bidirectional relationships between chronotype and sleep hygiene in children with and without parental history of alcohol use disorder. Phenotypes of sleep health among adults with chronic heart failure in a randomized controlled trial of cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia. Neighborhood social vulnerability as a mediator of racial disparities in insomnia severity. Sleep patterns in adolescents and associations with substance use.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1