A Qualitative Study of Hospitals and Payers Implementing Community Doula Support

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING Journal of midwifery & women's health Pub Date : 2024-01-19 DOI:10.1111/jmwh.13596
Christina Gebel MPH, Elysia Larson ScD, MPH, Heather A. Olden MPH, Cara B. Safon MPH, Tonia J. Rhone MS, Ndidiamaka N. Amutah-Onukagha PhD, MPH, CHES
{"title":"A Qualitative Study of Hospitals and Payers Implementing Community Doula Support","authors":"Christina Gebel MPH,&nbsp;Elysia Larson ScD, MPH,&nbsp;Heather A. Olden MPH,&nbsp;Cara B. Safon MPH,&nbsp;Tonia J. Rhone MS,&nbsp;Ndidiamaka N. Amutah-Onukagha PhD, MPH, CHES","doi":"10.1111/jmwh.13596","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>The impact of doula care on birth outcomes is well-established; however, doula support remains underutilized. Identifying barriers and facilitators to implementation is integral as the demand for doula care increases. The primary objective of this study was to examine doula program implementation across hospitals and payers at varying stages of implementation.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Representatives from 4 hospitals and 2 payers participated in focus group discussions. The doula programs were categorized as anticipated, initial, and advanced implementation statuses. Coding and thematic analysis were conducted using a deductive application of the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>There were 20 participants across 5 focus group discussions. Participants were mostly female, and nearly all had worked at their organization for at least 2 years. Salient themes shared across participants included valuing internal outcome data or peer-reviewed literature to support doula care as well as anecdotal stories; the reality of the resource-intensive nature of doula care implementation that goes beyond funding for doulas; and both the need for individual champions for change, such as midwives, and a supportive organizational culture that values health equity.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Discussion</h3>\n \n <p>The findings of this study highlight 3 contextual aspects that should be considered when implementing doula programs. These recommendations include: (1) use of a combination of research evidence and anecdotes when eliciting stakeholder support; (2) consideration of resources beyond funding such as program implementation support; (3) critical evaluation of organizational culture as a primary driver influencing the implementation of doula care. The future of the doula workforce in United States hospitals rests on the crux of intentional buy-in from hospital administration and clinical providers as well as the availability of requisite resources.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":16468,"journal":{"name":"Journal of midwifery & women's health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of midwifery & women's health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jmwh.13596","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

The impact of doula care on birth outcomes is well-established; however, doula support remains underutilized. Identifying barriers and facilitators to implementation is integral as the demand for doula care increases. The primary objective of this study was to examine doula program implementation across hospitals and payers at varying stages of implementation.

Methods

Representatives from 4 hospitals and 2 payers participated in focus group discussions. The doula programs were categorized as anticipated, initial, and advanced implementation statuses. Coding and thematic analysis were conducted using a deductive application of the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research.

Results

There were 20 participants across 5 focus group discussions. Participants were mostly female, and nearly all had worked at their organization for at least 2 years. Salient themes shared across participants included valuing internal outcome data or peer-reviewed literature to support doula care as well as anecdotal stories; the reality of the resource-intensive nature of doula care implementation that goes beyond funding for doulas; and both the need for individual champions for change, such as midwives, and a supportive organizational culture that values health equity.

Discussion

The findings of this study highlight 3 contextual aspects that should be considered when implementing doula programs. These recommendations include: (1) use of a combination of research evidence and anecdotes when eliciting stakeholder support; (2) consideration of resources beyond funding such as program implementation support; (3) critical evaluation of organizational culture as a primary driver influencing the implementation of doula care. The future of the doula workforce in United States hospitals rests on the crux of intentional buy-in from hospital administration and clinical providers as well as the availability of requisite resources.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对实施社区 Doula 支持的医院和付款人的定性研究。
导言:朵拉护理对分娩结果的影响已得到证实;然而,朵拉支持仍未得到充分利用。随着对朵拉(doula)护理需求的增加,确定实施的障碍和促进因素是不可或缺的。本研究的主要目的是考察处于不同实施阶段的医院和支付机构的朵拉项目实施情况:来自4家医院和2家支付方的代表参加了焦点小组讨论。朵拉项目被分为预期、初始和高级实施状态。采用实施研究综合框架的演绎法进行编码和主题分析:5 次焦点小组讨论共有 20 人参加。参与者大多为女性,几乎所有人都在各自的组织工作了至少两年。参与者分享的突出主题包括:重视支持朵拉护理的内部结果数据或同行评议文献以及轶事;朵拉护理实施的资源密集性现实,这超出了对朵拉的资助;以及既需要助产士等个人变革倡导者,也需要重视健康公平的支持性组织文化:本研究的结果强调了在实施朵拉项目时应考虑的三个背景方面。这些建议包括(1)在获得利益相关者的支持时,结合使用研究证据和轶事;(2)考虑资金以外的资源,如项目实施支持;(3)对组织文化进行批判性评估,将其作为影响朵拉护理实施的主要驱动力。美国医院中朵拉(doula)工作队伍的未来取决于医院管理部门和临床服务提供者的有意支持以及必要资源的可用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
7.40%
发文量
103
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Midwifery & Women''s Health (JMWH) is a bimonthly, peer-reviewed journal dedicated to the publication of original research and review articles that focus on midwifery and women''s health. JMWH provides a forum for interdisciplinary exchange across a broad range of women''s health issues. Manuscripts that address midwifery, women''s health, education, evidence-based practice, public health, policy, and research are welcomed
期刊最新文献
Issue Information El embarazo no planificado: ¿Qué debo hacer? ACNM Fellows Inducted in 2024 Systematic Reviews to Inform Practice, September/October 2024 The American College of Nurse-Midwives Lifetime Visionary Award 2024: Marsha Elaine Caldwell Jackson, CNM, MSN, FACNM
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1