Urban sprawl and racial inequality in intergenerational mobility

IF 3.1 2区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS Journal of Economic Geography Pub Date : 2024-01-18 DOI:10.1093/jeg/lbad039
Ning Xiong, Yehua Dennis Wei, Sergio J Rey
{"title":"Urban sprawl and racial inequality in intergenerational mobility","authors":"Ning Xiong, Yehua Dennis Wei, Sergio J Rey","doi":"10.1093/jeg/lbad039","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Persistent racial inequality in socioeconomic status within urban areas has been a significant concern in both the US and European countries. Differences across racial groups in intergenerational mobility (IM) have been identified as a key source of this persistence. However, efforts to understand racial inequality in IM have rarely considered the role of urban sprawl. This article argues that urban sprawl affects differences in IM between racial groups directly and indirectly through racial segregation, racial bias, and social capital. We analyze data from 874 metropolitan counties in the US using structural equation models to test these direct and indirect effects of sprawl on racial inequality in IM. We found that urban sprawl was negatively associated with racial inequality in IM. The direct effect, which we partially attribute to higher racial disparities in social capital in more compact counties, was statistically significant. For the indirect effects, racial segregation had the largest mediating effects between urban sprawl and racial inequality in IM, followed by economic connectedness (EC) and racial bias. The net indirect effect of sprawl on racial inequality in IM was negative because negative indirect effects through racial segregation and EC outweigh positive indirect effects through racial bias. Our findings demonstrate the significant role of urban form in racial inequality in IM.","PeriodicalId":48251,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Economic Geography","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Economic Geography","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lbad039","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Persistent racial inequality in socioeconomic status within urban areas has been a significant concern in both the US and European countries. Differences across racial groups in intergenerational mobility (IM) have been identified as a key source of this persistence. However, efforts to understand racial inequality in IM have rarely considered the role of urban sprawl. This article argues that urban sprawl affects differences in IM between racial groups directly and indirectly through racial segregation, racial bias, and social capital. We analyze data from 874 metropolitan counties in the US using structural equation models to test these direct and indirect effects of sprawl on racial inequality in IM. We found that urban sprawl was negatively associated with racial inequality in IM. The direct effect, which we partially attribute to higher racial disparities in social capital in more compact counties, was statistically significant. For the indirect effects, racial segregation had the largest mediating effects between urban sprawl and racial inequality in IM, followed by economic connectedness (EC) and racial bias. The net indirect effect of sprawl on racial inequality in IM was negative because negative indirect effects through racial segregation and EC outweigh positive indirect effects through racial bias. Our findings demonstrate the significant role of urban form in racial inequality in IM.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
城市扩张与代际流动中的种族不平等
在美国和欧洲国家,城市地区社会经济地位中持续存在的种族不平等现象一直备受关注。不同种族群体之间在代际流动性(IM)方面的差异被认为是造成这种持续性的主要原因。然而,人们在努力理解代际流动中的种族不平等时,却很少考虑城市扩张的作用。本文认为,城市无计划扩展通过种族隔离、种族偏见和社会资本直接或间接地影响了种族群体间代际流动的差异。我们使用结构方程模型分析了来自美国 874 个大都市县的数据,以检验无计划扩展对种族 IM 不平等的直接和间接影响。我们发现,城市扩张与 IM 中的种族不平等呈负相关。我们将这种直接影响部分归因于在更紧凑的县城中社会资本的种族差异更大,这种直接影响在统计上是显著的。就间接效应而言,种族隔离在城市无计划扩展与 IM 中的种族不平等之间具有最大的中介效应,其次是经济联系(EC)和种族偏见。无计划扩展对 IM 中种族不平等的净间接效应是负的,因为通过种族隔离和经济联系产生的负间接效应超过了通过种族偏见产生的正间接效应。我们的研究结果表明,城市形态在 IM 的种族不平等中发挥着重要作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
6.90%
发文量
33
期刊介绍: The aims of the Journal of Economic Geography are to redefine and reinvigorate the intersection between economics and geography, and to provide a world-class journal in the field. The journal is steered by a distinguished team of Editors and an Editorial Board, drawn equally from the two disciplines. It publishes original academic research and discussion of the highest scholarly standard in the field of ''economic geography'' broadly defined. Submitted papers are refereed, and are evaluated on the basis of their creativity, quality of scholarship, and contribution to advancing understanding of the geographic nature of economic systems and global economic change.
期刊最新文献
The gravity of distance: evidence from a trade embargo When market access gains do not spur urban growth Does social capital foster renewable energy cooperatives? Welcome back! The impact of ‘return initiatives’ on return migration to rural regions Land valuation in the metaverse: location matters
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1