Thought Communities and Pre-conditions for Polity Formation in the European Union: Evidence From Six EU Member States

IF 3.1 1区 社会学 Q1 ECONOMICS Jcms-Journal of Common Market Studies Pub Date : 2024-01-14 DOI:10.1111/jcms.13576
Jozef Bátora, Pavol Baboš
{"title":"Thought Communities and Pre-conditions for Polity Formation in the European Union: Evidence From Six EU Member States","authors":"Jozef Bátora, Pavol Baboš","doi":"10.1111/jcms.13576","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"How do citizens in European Union (EU) member states think about the EU? And what are the implications of different ‘thinking styles’ for citizens' preferences regarding formation of policies, politics and polity in the EU? The current article uses relational class analysis (RCA) and analyses perceptions of the EU as a political order by citizens in six selected member states. These are France, Germany, Italy, Hungary, Poland and Slovakia – three founding/large member states and three members of the Visegrád group (two of which represent the most notorious examples of the ongoing ‘sovereignist’ backlash). Using RCA, we identify two thought communities in the selected EU member states: statists and pragmatists. These are the communities of citizens sharing thinking styles that would suggest their support for particular polity types in the EU.","PeriodicalId":51369,"journal":{"name":"Jcms-Journal of Common Market Studies","volume":"47 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jcms-Journal of Common Market Studies","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.13576","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

How do citizens in European Union (EU) member states think about the EU? And what are the implications of different ‘thinking styles’ for citizens' preferences regarding formation of policies, politics and polity in the EU? The current article uses relational class analysis (RCA) and analyses perceptions of the EU as a political order by citizens in six selected member states. These are France, Germany, Italy, Hungary, Poland and Slovakia – three founding/large member states and three members of the Visegrád group (two of which represent the most notorious examples of the ongoing ‘sovereignist’ backlash). Using RCA, we identify two thought communities in the selected EU member states: statists and pragmatists. These are the communities of citizens sharing thinking styles that would suggest their support for particular polity types in the EU.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
欧盟的思想共同体和政体形成的先决条件:来自六个欧盟成员国的证据
欧洲联盟(欧盟)成员国的公民如何看待欧盟?不同的 "思维方式 "对公民在欧盟政策、政治和政体形成方面的偏好有何影响?本文采用关系类分析法 (RCA) 分析了六个选定成员国的公民对欧盟作为一种政治秩序的看法。这六个国家分别是法国、德国、意大利、匈牙利、波兰和斯洛伐克--三个创始国/大成员国和三个维舍格拉德集团成员(其中两个代表了当前 "主权主义 "反弹中最臭名昭著的例子)。利用 RCA,我们在选定的欧盟成员国中确定了两个思想群体:国家主义者和实用主义者。这两个群体的公民具有相同的思维方式,表明他们支持欧盟的特定政体类型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
18.20%
发文量
137
期刊最新文献
Contested but Resilient: Accounting for the Endurance of the European Union's Foreign Policy European Union Normative Positions, Resilience and Contestation: A Perceptual Approach Two Norms Collide: EU Policy on Fragile and Conflict‐Affected Countries Decentring European Union Foreign Policy: Addressing Colonial Dynamics in EU‐Algeria Relations Everything Everywhere All at Once? Introducing a Field‐Theoretic Model for Party Politics in the European Union
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1