{"title":"Theory and simulation of shock waves freely propagating through monoatomic non-Boltzmann gas","authors":"Malte Döntgen","doi":"10.1007/s00162-023-00683-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The effect of non-Boltzmann energy distributions on the free propagation of shock waves through a monoatomic gas is investigated via theory and simulation. First, the non-Boltzmann heat capacity ratio <span>\\(\\gamma \\)</span>, as a key property for describing shock waves, is derived from first principles via microcanonical integration. Second, atomistic molecular dynamics simulations resembling a shock tube setup are used to test the theory. The presented theory provides heat capacity ratios ranging from the well-known <span>\\(\\gamma = 5/3\\)</span> for Boltzmann energy-distributed gas to <span>\\(\\gamma \\rightarrow 1\\)</span> for delta energy-distributed gas. The molecular dynamics simulations of Boltzmann and non-Boltzmann driven gases suggest that the shock wave propagates about 9% slower through the non-Boltzmann driven gas, while the contact wave appears to be about 4% faster if it trails non-Boltzmann driven gas. The observed slowdown of the shock wave through applying a non-Boltzmann energy distribution was found to be consistent with the classical shock wave equations when applying the non-Boltzmann heat capacity ratio. These fundamental findings provide insights into the behavior of non-Boltzmann gases and might help to improve the understanding of gas dynamical phenomena.\n</p>","PeriodicalId":795,"journal":{"name":"Theoretical and Computational Fluid Dynamics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00162-023-00683-w.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Theoretical and Computational Fluid Dynamics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00162-023-00683-w","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MECHANICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The effect of non-Boltzmann energy distributions on the free propagation of shock waves through a monoatomic gas is investigated via theory and simulation. First, the non-Boltzmann heat capacity ratio \(\gamma \), as a key property for describing shock waves, is derived from first principles via microcanonical integration. Second, atomistic molecular dynamics simulations resembling a shock tube setup are used to test the theory. The presented theory provides heat capacity ratios ranging from the well-known \(\gamma = 5/3\) for Boltzmann energy-distributed gas to \(\gamma \rightarrow 1\) for delta energy-distributed gas. The molecular dynamics simulations of Boltzmann and non-Boltzmann driven gases suggest that the shock wave propagates about 9% slower through the non-Boltzmann driven gas, while the contact wave appears to be about 4% faster if it trails non-Boltzmann driven gas. The observed slowdown of the shock wave through applying a non-Boltzmann energy distribution was found to be consistent with the classical shock wave equations when applying the non-Boltzmann heat capacity ratio. These fundamental findings provide insights into the behavior of non-Boltzmann gases and might help to improve the understanding of gas dynamical phenomena.
期刊介绍:
Theoretical and Computational Fluid Dynamics provides a forum for the cross fertilization of ideas, tools and techniques across all disciplines in which fluid flow plays a role. The focus is on aspects of fluid dynamics where theory and computation are used to provide insights and data upon which solid physical understanding is revealed. We seek research papers, invited review articles, brief communications, letters and comments addressing flow phenomena of relevance to aeronautical, geophysical, environmental, material, mechanical and life sciences. Papers of a purely algorithmic, experimental or engineering application nature, and papers without significant new physical insights, are outside the scope of this journal. For computational work, authors are responsible for ensuring that any artifacts of discretization and/or implementation are sufficiently controlled such that the numerical results unambiguously support the conclusions drawn. Where appropriate, and to the extent possible, such papers should either include or reference supporting documentation in the form of verification and validation studies.