{"title":"Mineral import behavior in response to shocks: A nonlinear perspective","authors":"Manuel A. Zambrano-Monserrate","doi":"10.1016/j.rie.2024.01.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The global economic dependence on mineral imports stands as a pivotal concern motivating this study. Given the uneven distribution of these natural resources worldwide, numerous economies have had to resort to international trade to meet their domestic demand. Despite the significance of this phenomenon, existing literature on the subject has only scratched the surface of the complexities underlying the dynamics of mineral imports. In this context, the current research aims to address this gap by examining the interplay between mineral imports and various factors, such as renewable electricity, oil and mineral prices, gross domestic product (GDP), and exchange rates. In contrast to conventional research methods, the Panel Vector Autoregressive (PVAR) methodology is employed, estimated through the System Generalized Method of Moments (System GMM). This methodological choice offers notable advantages in adequately addressing heteroscedasticity and endogeneity, demonstrating efficiency even in small sample sizes. The key findings of this study reveal a nonlinear relationship between mineral imports and the specified variables. This implies that, in response to a positive shock in a given variable, the demand for mineral imports may either increase or decrease, depending on the time horizon considered in the evaluation.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":46094,"journal":{"name":"Research in Economics","volume":"78 1","pages":"Pages 14-24"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in Economics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S109094432400005X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The global economic dependence on mineral imports stands as a pivotal concern motivating this study. Given the uneven distribution of these natural resources worldwide, numerous economies have had to resort to international trade to meet their domestic demand. Despite the significance of this phenomenon, existing literature on the subject has only scratched the surface of the complexities underlying the dynamics of mineral imports. In this context, the current research aims to address this gap by examining the interplay between mineral imports and various factors, such as renewable electricity, oil and mineral prices, gross domestic product (GDP), and exchange rates. In contrast to conventional research methods, the Panel Vector Autoregressive (PVAR) methodology is employed, estimated through the System Generalized Method of Moments (System GMM). This methodological choice offers notable advantages in adequately addressing heteroscedasticity and endogeneity, demonstrating efficiency even in small sample sizes. The key findings of this study reveal a nonlinear relationship between mineral imports and the specified variables. This implies that, in response to a positive shock in a given variable, the demand for mineral imports may either increase or decrease, depending on the time horizon considered in the evaluation.
期刊介绍:
Established in 1947, Research in Economics is one of the oldest general-interest economics journals in the world and the main one among those based in Italy. The purpose of the journal is to select original theoretical and empirical articles that will have high impact on the debate in the social sciences; since 1947, it has published important research contributions on a wide range of topics. A summary of our editorial policy is this: the editors make a preliminary assessment of whether the results of a paper, if correct, are worth publishing. If so one of the associate editors reviews the paper: from the reviewer we expect to learn if the paper is understandable and coherent and - within reasonable bounds - the results are correct. We believe that long lags in publication and multiple demands for revision simply slow scientific progress. Our goal is to provide you a definitive answer within one month of submission. We give the editors one week to judge the overall contribution and if acceptable send your paper to an associate editor. We expect the associate editor to provide a more detailed evaluation within three weeks so that the editors can make a final decision before the month expires. In the (rare) case of a revision we allow four months and in the case of conditional acceptance we allow two months to submit the final version. In both cases we expect a cover letter explaining how you met the requirements. For conditional acceptance the editors will verify that the requirements were met. In the case of revision the original associate editor will do so. If the revision cannot be at least conditionally accepted it is rejected: there is no second revision.