The Revival of US Hospital Care, 2004-2019.

IF 3.3 2区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Medical Care Pub Date : 2024-03-01 Epub Date: 2024-01-17 DOI:10.1097/MLR.0000000000001967
Kevin Quinn, Christine Bredfeldt
{"title":"The Revival of US Hospital Care, 2004-2019.","authors":"Kevin Quinn, Christine Bredfeldt","doi":"10.1097/MLR.0000000000001967","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Between 2004 and 2019, the US hospital industry reversed the 21-year decline in its share of national health spending.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To measure and explain changes in hospital utilization, cost, charges, and inpatient case mix.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>Principal sources were the American Hospital Association annual survey, the National Inpatient Sample, and the Healthcare Cost Reporting Information System. The study included all US community hospitals (n=5141 in 2019).</p><p><strong>Analytic approach: </strong>We used factor decomposition to separate the impacts of population, utilization, unit cost, and charge markups on the growth in cost and charges for inpatient and outpatient care nationwide and for each state. For unit cost, we separated the impacts of input price inflation and treatment intensity. To measure the inpatient case mix, we applied an all-patient diagnosis-related groups algorithm.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Between 2004 and 2019, charges more than tripled to $4.11 trillion. The cost more than doubled to $911 billion. For inpatient care, discharges fell 5%, discharges per person fell 15%, cost per discharge increased 88%, and charge markups rose 43%. For outpatient care, visits rose 36%, visits per person rose 21%, cost per visit rose 119%, and charge markups rose 52%. Treatment intensity increased by 33% per discharge and 55% per visit. Nationwide, the inpatient case mix increased by 34%, reflecting sicker patients and better clinical documentation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We quantified 3 important trends: rapid growth in outpatient visits, increased treatment intensity, and sustained increases in markups. Increased treatment intensity was the largest factor behind $491 billion in hospital cost growth between 2004 and 2019.</p>","PeriodicalId":18364,"journal":{"name":"Medical Care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MLR.0000000000001967","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Between 2004 and 2019, the US hospital industry reversed the 21-year decline in its share of national health spending.

Objective: To measure and explain changes in hospital utilization, cost, charges, and inpatient case mix.

Data sources: Principal sources were the American Hospital Association annual survey, the National Inpatient Sample, and the Healthcare Cost Reporting Information System. The study included all US community hospitals (n=5141 in 2019).

Analytic approach: We used factor decomposition to separate the impacts of population, utilization, unit cost, and charge markups on the growth in cost and charges for inpatient and outpatient care nationwide and for each state. For unit cost, we separated the impacts of input price inflation and treatment intensity. To measure the inpatient case mix, we applied an all-patient diagnosis-related groups algorithm.

Results: Between 2004 and 2019, charges more than tripled to $4.11 trillion. The cost more than doubled to $911 billion. For inpatient care, discharges fell 5%, discharges per person fell 15%, cost per discharge increased 88%, and charge markups rose 43%. For outpatient care, visits rose 36%, visits per person rose 21%, cost per visit rose 119%, and charge markups rose 52%. Treatment intensity increased by 33% per discharge and 55% per visit. Nationwide, the inpatient case mix increased by 34%, reflecting sicker patients and better clinical documentation.

Conclusions: We quantified 3 important trends: rapid growth in outpatient visits, increased treatment intensity, and sustained increases in markups. Increased treatment intensity was the largest factor behind $491 billion in hospital cost growth between 2004 and 2019.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
2004-2019 年美国医院护理的复兴。
背景2004 年至 2019 年间,美国医院行业扭转了其在全国医疗支出中所占份额长达 21 年的下降趋势:测量并解释医院利用率、成本、收费和住院病人组合的变化:数据主要来源于美国医院协会年度调查、全国住院病人抽样调查和医疗成本报告信息系统。研究对象包括所有美国社区医院(2019 年为 5141 家):我们使用因素分解法来分离人口、使用率、单位成本和收费加价对全国和各州住院和门诊护理成本和收费增长的影响。对于单位成本,我们将输入价格通胀和治疗强度的影响分开。为了衡量住院病人的病例组合,我们采用了所有病人诊断相关组的算法:从 2004 年到 2019 年,收费增加了两倍多,达到 4.11 万亿美元。成本增加了一倍多,达到 9110 亿美元。在住院护理方面,出院人数下降了 5%,人均出院人数下降了 15%,每次出院成本增加了 88%,收费加价上涨了 43%。在门诊护理方面,就诊人次增加了 36%,人均就诊人次增加了 21%,每次就诊成本增加了 119%,收费加价增加了 52%。每次出院的治疗强度增加了 33%,每次就诊的治疗强度增加了 55%。在全国范围内,住院病人的病例组合增加了 34%,这反映出病人病情加重,临床文件记录更加完善:我们量化了三个重要趋势:门诊量的快速增长、治疗强度的提高以及加价的持续增长。治疗强度的增加是 2004 年至 2019 年期间 4,910 亿美元医院成本增长背后的最大因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Medical Care
Medical Care 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
3.30%
发文量
228
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Rated as one of the top ten journals in healthcare administration, Medical Care is devoted to all aspects of the administration and delivery of healthcare. This scholarly journal publishes original, peer-reviewed papers documenting the most current developments in the rapidly changing field of healthcare. This timely journal reports on the findings of original investigations into issues related to the research, planning, organization, financing, provision, and evaluation of health services.
期刊最新文献
Associations of Homelessness With Primary Care and Acute Care Utilization Among Medicaid-Enrolled Youth. Clinical Outcomes Among High-Risk Primary Care Patients With Diabetic Kidney Disease: Methodological Challenges and Results From the STOP-DKD Study. Children and Youth Are a Critical Part of the American Story of Homelessness. Trajectories and Transitions in Service Use Among Older Veterans at High Risk of Long-Term Institutional Care. Conduct of Large, Multisite, Comparative Clinical Effectiveness Research Studies: Learnings From the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute's Palliative Care Learning Network.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1