Medical Care最新文献

Objective: Given the high prevalence of maternal morbidity and mortality, it is imperative that maternal health interventions are comprehensively evaluated, so they can be scaled with fidelity. Community-based care management models focused on perinatal health care are a priority for health care systems and payers. Alternative care management delivery modalities, such as video visits, are needed to expand program reach amidst growing system-level challenges. This evaluation explores the feasibility, acceptability, and impact of video versus telephonic care in perinatal care management.

Methods: Using a mixed methods approach, we implemented a quality improvement project to learn about the integration and impact of video-enabled care into the UPMC Health Plan "Pregnancy Clinical Support" (PCS) care management delivery model. Focus groups were conducted with PCS care managers (CMs) to explore their perspectives on video-visit integration. Video-only members were propensity scores matched to telephonic-only members; statistical comparisons were conducted to assess between-group differences in engagement.

Results: PCS CMs discussed ways to structure effective video-visit onboarding, strengths, and drawbacks of video-enabled care, workflow integration challenges, and best practices for introducing video visits to members. Video-only members had significantly (P < 0.0001) more clinical sessions (2.56 ± 1.57 vs 2.05 ± 1.52) and longer case duration measured in calendar days (209 ± 80 vs 169 ± 94) during the 17-month project period than telephonic-only members.

Conclusion: Evidence generated provides direct guidance on successfully integrating video visits into workflows of community-based CMs while improving engagement in care across diverse member populations.

Objectives: We identify the association between high- and low-intensity case management services on hospital and emergency department (ED) use among CommunityConnect patients.

Background: Social needs case management services vary in intensity, including the modality, workforce specialization, and maximum caseload. CommunityConnect is a social needs case management program implemented by Contra Costa Health, a county safety-net health system in California's San Francisco Bay Area.

Methods: Due to the endogeneity of high-intensity services assigned to high-risk patients, we instrument for service intensity using the number of specialist case managers hired each month of enrollment. Zero-inflated negative binomial models with 2-stage residual inclusion estimated total and avoidable hospital admissions and ED visits 12 months post-enrollment for adult Medicaid beneficiaries enrolled between August 2017 and December 2018 (n = 19,782).

Results: Compared with low-intensity case management, high-intensity services were associated with a reduction in the incidence rates of inpatient admissions [incidence rate ratio (IRR) = 0.341, 95% CI: 0.106-1.102; P = 0.072], ED visits (IRR = 0.608, 95% CI: 0.188-1.965; P = 0.058), and avoidable ED visits (IRR = 0.579, 95% CI: 0.179-1.872; P = 0.091). No significant association was found between service intensity and the likelihood of an event being an excess zero.

Conclusions: High-intensity social needs case management may be more effective than low-intensity service at reducing health care use for individuals with non-zero use, suggesting that intensive case management may be especially helpful in supporting discharge and transitions of care.

Background: Patient-perpetrated sexual harassment toward health care providers is common and adversely affects provider well-being, workforce outcomes, and patient care. Organizational climate for sexual harassment-shared perceptions about an organization's practices, policies, and procedures-is one of the strongest predictors of harassment prevalence. We conducted a pilot survey assessing provider perceptions of the Veterans Health Administration (VA)'s climate related to patient-perpetrated sexual harassment.

Research design: Responding providers completed a survey assessing: (1) experiences with patient-perpetrated sexual harassment; (2) beliefs about VA's responses to patient-perpetrated sexual harassment of staff; and (3) perceptions of VA's organizational climate related to sexual harassment for each of 4 perpetrator-target pairings (patient-perpetrated harassment of staff, patient-perpetrated harassment of patients, staff-perpetrated harassment of staff, and staff-perpetrated harassment of patients).

Subjects: Respondents included 105 primary care providers (staff physicians, nurse practitioners, and physician assistants) at 15 facilities in the VA Women's Health Practice-Based Research Network.

Results: Seventy-one percent of responding providers reported experiencing patient-perpetrated sexual harassment in the past 6 months. Respondent perceptions of VA's responses to patient-perpetrated harassment of staff were mixed (eg, indicating that VA creates an environment where harassment is safe to discuss but that it fails to offer adequate guidance for responding to harassment). Respondents rated organizational climate related to patient-perpetrated harassment of staff as significantly more negative compared with climate related to other perpetrator-target pairings.

Conclusions: Future work with representative samples is needed to corroborate these findings, which have potential ramifications for VA's ongoing efforts to create a safe, inclusive environment of care.

The Office of Disease Prevention and Health Promotion (ODPHP) at the US Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) oversees Healthy People 2030, the nation's decennial health promotion and disease prevention framework and plan, which sets national goals and identifies science-based measurable objectives with targets to evaluate efforts to improve health and well-being. With science recognizing the relationship between health and well-being, Healthy People 2030 is broadening its understanding of national-level well-being by gathering new data for and coordinating across the federal government on well-being. The addition of well-being in Healthy People 2030 elevates well-being as a national priority and creates opportunities for the well-being of the nation to be assessed, disparities to be identified, and collaborative efforts to be coordinated to support a society in which all people can achieve their full potential for health and well-being. This article discusses the inclusion of well-being to Healthy People 2030, details the approach and rationale for the selection of the national well-being metrics, and articulates opportunities for improving population-level well-being and federal collaboration.

Objective: There are lingering concerns in the United States about home birth. We used 2 large (n = 50,043; n = 62,984), national community birth registries to compare maternal and neonatal outcomes for planned home versus planned birth center births.

Methods: To compare outcomes by intended birth site, we used logistic regressions, controlling for demographic and pregnancy risk variables. Maternal outcomes included intrapartum or postpartum transfer to hospital, hospitalization, cesarean, and hemorrhage; neonatal outcomes included neonatal transfer, hospitalization, neonatal intensive care unit admission, and intrapartum or neonatal death. Analyses were conducted twice, once in each dataset.

Results: Individuals who planned home births had a lower incidence of all types of transfers, compared with those who planned birth center births, but in one dataset only, experienced more cesareans [adjusted odds ratio (95% CI): 1.32 (1.02-1.70); 0.95 (0.88-1.03)]. Planned home birth was associated with lower adjusted odds of maternal hospitalization in one dataset but not the other [0.97 (0.54-1.74); 0.85 (0.76-0.95)], and was not associated with hemorrhage. Neonatal outcomes likewise were either not associated with a planned birthplace or suggested home birth was safer: hospitalization [0.77 (0.53-1.11), 0.90 (0.82-0.98)], neonatal intensive care unit admission [0.54 (0.28-1.00), 0.97 (0.86-1.10)]. There was no observable association with intrapartum or neonatal death: 1.07 (0.68-1.67; only calculated once because of small numbers of events).

Conclusions: Planned home births are as safe as planned birth center births for low-risk pregnancies. Current guidelines advising against planned home births are not supported by these data.