Quantifying the Educational Value of a Student-Run Free Clinic.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Family Medicine Pub Date : 2024-03-01 Epub Date: 2024-01-16 DOI:10.22454/FamMed.2024.568265
Megan Mazander, Joseph Rumenapp, Derek Lee, Charmaine Ong, Emily Floramo, Maureen Benjamins, Melissa Chen
{"title":"Quantifying the Educational Value of a Student-Run Free Clinic.","authors":"Megan Mazander, Joseph Rumenapp, Derek Lee, Charmaine Ong, Emily Floramo, Maureen Benjamins, Melissa Chen","doi":"10.22454/FamMed.2024.568265","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Student-run free clinics (SRFCs) are settings in which students in health professions gain clinical experience, often while providing free or reduced-cost health care to the surrounding community. The current literature quantifies the many benefits these clinics provide to their patients and the impact they have on students' future careers; but few previous studies have assessed the financial impact of the education provided at an SRFC. We report on a net educational benefit, an educational benefit to educational cost ratio, and a net educational benefit to educational cost ratio of one SRFC from the perspective of the university.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We calculated the value of education by multiplying all student hours worked in the clinic by the associated value of 1 hour in the typical tuition-based curriculum. Clinic educational costs and student hours were obtained from clinic records from August 1, 2021 through July 31, 2022.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We found the total educational value students received to be $73,571 over one academic year. The educational operating expenses of the clinic totaled $9,053, resulting in a benefit-cost ratio of 8.13.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This analysis demonstrated a potential financial advantage of operating an SRFC when assessing clinic education expenses in relation to the value of university-generated education. Our research may serve as a starting point to showcase the economic benefit of SRFCs to their parent institutions and encourage further analysis of other benefits SRFCs may provide to institutions of higher education.</p>","PeriodicalId":50456,"journal":{"name":"Family Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"176-179"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11136632/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Family Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22454/FamMed.2024.568265","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objectives: Student-run free clinics (SRFCs) are settings in which students in health professions gain clinical experience, often while providing free or reduced-cost health care to the surrounding community. The current literature quantifies the many benefits these clinics provide to their patients and the impact they have on students' future careers; but few previous studies have assessed the financial impact of the education provided at an SRFC. We report on a net educational benefit, an educational benefit to educational cost ratio, and a net educational benefit to educational cost ratio of one SRFC from the perspective of the university.

Methods: We calculated the value of education by multiplying all student hours worked in the clinic by the associated value of 1 hour in the typical tuition-based curriculum. Clinic educational costs and student hours were obtained from clinic records from August 1, 2021 through July 31, 2022.

Results: We found the total educational value students received to be $73,571 over one academic year. The educational operating expenses of the clinic totaled $9,053, resulting in a benefit-cost ratio of 8.13.

Conclusions: This analysis demonstrated a potential financial advantage of operating an SRFC when assessing clinic education expenses in relation to the value of university-generated education. Our research may serve as a starting point to showcase the economic benefit of SRFCs to their parent institutions and encourage further analysis of other benefits SRFCs may provide to institutions of higher education.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
量化学生开办的免费诊所的教育价值。
背景和目标:学生开办的免费诊所(SRFC)是卫生专业学生获得临床经验的场所,通常同时为周边社区提供免费或低价医疗服务。目前的文献量化了这些诊所为患者带来的诸多益处以及对学生未来职业生涯的影响;但此前很少有研究对 SRFC 所提供教育的财务影响进行评估。我们从大学的角度报告了一家 SRFC 的净教育收益、教育收益与教育成本的比率以及净教育收益与教育成本的比率:我们计算教育价值的方法是,将学生在诊所的所有工作时间乘以典型学费课程中 1 小时的相关价值。诊所教育成本和学生课时来自 2021 年 8 月 1 日至 2022 年 7 月 31 日的诊所记录:我们发现,学生在一学年中获得的教育总价值为 73,571 美元。诊所的教育运营费用总计 9053 美元,效益成本比为 8.13:这项分析表明,在评估诊所教育支出与大学教育价值之间的关系时,开办 SRFC 具有潜在的财务优势。我们的研究可以作为一个起点,展示 SRFC 为其母校带来的经济效益,并鼓励进一步分析 SRFC 可能为高等院校带来的其他效益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Family Medicine
Family Medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
21.10%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Family Medicine, the official journal of the Society of Teachers of Family Medicine, publishes original research, systematic reviews, narrative essays, and policy analyses relevant to the discipline of family medicine, particularly focusing on primary care medical education, health workforce policy, and health services research. Journal content is not limited to educational research from family medicine educators; and we welcome innovative, high-quality contributions from authors in a variety of specialties and academic fields.
期刊最新文献
Dancing in the Rain. Practice Intention: Addressing the Needs of Diverse Underserved Communities in Medical Education. Underrepresented in Medicine Mentorship Program: Perceived Benefits and Lessons Learned. Authors' Response to "Anticipating Uncertainty: A New Frontier in Family Medicine Training". Anticipating Uncertainty: A New Frontier in Family Medicine Training.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1