Frequency selectivity in monkey auditory nerve studied with suprathreshold multicomponent stimuli

IF 2.5 2区 医学 Q1 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY Hearing Research Pub Date : 2024-01-21 DOI:10.1016/j.heares.2024.108964
PX Joris , E Verschooten , M Mc Laughlin , CPC Versteegh , M van der Heijden
{"title":"Frequency selectivity in monkey auditory nerve studied with suprathreshold multicomponent stimuli","authors":"PX Joris ,&nbsp;E Verschooten ,&nbsp;M Mc Laughlin ,&nbsp;CPC Versteegh ,&nbsp;M van der Heijden","doi":"10.1016/j.heares.2024.108964","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Data from non-human primates can help extend observations from non-primate species to humans. Here we report measurements on the auditory nerve of macaque monkeys in the context of a controversial topic important to human hearing. A range of techniques have been used to examine the claim, which is not generally accepted, that human frequency tuning is sharper than traditionally thought, and sharper than in commonly used animal models. Data from single auditory-nerve fibers occupy a pivotal position to examine this claim, but are not available for humans. A previous study reported sharper tuning in auditory-nerve fibers of macaque relative to the cat. A limitation of these and other single-fiber data is that frequency selectivity was measured with tonal threshold-tuning curves, which do not directly assess spectral filtering and whose shape is sharpened by cochlear nonlinearity. Our aim was to measure spectral filtering with wideband suprathreshold stimuli in the macaque auditory nerve. We obtained responses of single nerve fibers of anesthetized macaque monkeys and cats to a suprathreshold, wideband, multicomponent stimulus designed to allow characterization of spectral filtering at any cochlear locus. Quantitatively the differences between the two species are smaller than in previous studies, but consistent with these studies the filters obtained show a trend of sharper tuning in macaque, relative to the cat, for fibers in the basal half of the cochlea. We also examined differences in group delay measured on the phase data near the characteristic frequency versus in the low-frequency tail. The phase data are consistent with the interpretation of sharper frequency tuning in monkey in the basal half of the cochlea. We conclude that use of suprathreshold, wide-band stimuli supports the interpretation of sharper frequency selectivity in macaque nerve fibers relative to the cat, although the difference is less marked than apparent from the assessment with tonal threshold-based data.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":12881,"journal":{"name":"Hearing Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hearing Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378595524000170","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Data from non-human primates can help extend observations from non-primate species to humans. Here we report measurements on the auditory nerve of macaque monkeys in the context of a controversial topic important to human hearing. A range of techniques have been used to examine the claim, which is not generally accepted, that human frequency tuning is sharper than traditionally thought, and sharper than in commonly used animal models. Data from single auditory-nerve fibers occupy a pivotal position to examine this claim, but are not available for humans. A previous study reported sharper tuning in auditory-nerve fibers of macaque relative to the cat. A limitation of these and other single-fiber data is that frequency selectivity was measured with tonal threshold-tuning curves, which do not directly assess spectral filtering and whose shape is sharpened by cochlear nonlinearity. Our aim was to measure spectral filtering with wideband suprathreshold stimuli in the macaque auditory nerve. We obtained responses of single nerve fibers of anesthetized macaque monkeys and cats to a suprathreshold, wideband, multicomponent stimulus designed to allow characterization of spectral filtering at any cochlear locus. Quantitatively the differences between the two species are smaller than in previous studies, but consistent with these studies the filters obtained show a trend of sharper tuning in macaque, relative to the cat, for fibers in the basal half of the cochlea. We also examined differences in group delay measured on the phase data near the characteristic frequency versus in the low-frequency tail. The phase data are consistent with the interpretation of sharper frequency tuning in monkey in the basal half of the cochlea. We conclude that use of suprathreshold, wide-band stimuli supports the interpretation of sharper frequency selectivity in macaque nerve fibers relative to the cat, although the difference is less marked than apparent from the assessment with tonal threshold-based data.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用阈上多成分刺激研究猴子听觉神经的频率选择性
非人类灵长类动物的数据有助于将非灵长类动物的观察结果推广到人类。在此,我们结合对人类听力很重要的一个有争议的话题,报告了对猕猴听觉神经的测量结果。人类的频率调谐比传统观点认为的更敏锐,也比常用的动物模型更敏锐。来自单个听觉神经纤维的数据在研究这一说法中占据关键地位,但人类却无法获得这些数据。之前的一项研究报告称,猕猴听觉神经纤维的调谐比猫更敏锐。这些数据和其他单纤维数据的局限性在于,频率选择性是通过音调阈值-调谐曲线来测量的,而音调阈值-调谐曲线并不能直接评估频谱过滤,而且其形状会因耳蜗非线性而变得更加尖锐。我们的目的是用宽带阈上刺激测量猕猴听神经的频谱过滤。我们获得了麻醉猕猴和猫的单神经纤维对阈上、宽带、多分量刺激的反应,这种刺激可用于描述任何耳蜗位置的频谱滤波。从数量上看,两个物种之间的差异比以前的研究要小,但与这些研究一致的是,获得的滤波器显示出一种趋势,即相对于猫,猕猴耳蜗基底半部纤维的调谐更敏锐。我们还研究了根据相位数据测得的特征频率附近与低频尾部的群延迟差异。相位数据与猴子耳蜗基底半部频率调谐更敏锐的解释一致。我们的结论是,使用超阈值、宽频带刺激可以解释猕猴神经纤维的频率选择性比猫更敏锐,尽管这种差异没有基于音调阈值数据的评估那么明显。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Hearing Research
Hearing Research 医学-耳鼻喉科学
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
14.30%
发文量
163
审稿时长
75 days
期刊介绍: The aim of the journal is to provide a forum for papers concerned with basic peripheral and central auditory mechanisms. Emphasis is on experimental and clinical studies, but theoretical and methodological papers will also be considered. The journal publishes original research papers, review and mini- review articles, rapid communications, method/protocol and perspective articles. Papers submitted should deal with auditory anatomy, physiology, psychophysics, imaging, modeling and behavioural studies in animals and humans, as well as hearing aids and cochlear implants. Papers dealing with the vestibular system are also considered for publication. Papers on comparative aspects of hearing and on effects of drugs and environmental contaminants on hearing function will also be considered. Clinical papers will be accepted when they contribute to the understanding of normal and pathological hearing functions.
期刊最新文献
Cross-sectional screening for inflammation in tinnitus with near-normal hearing Frequency dependence and harmonic distortion of stapes displacement and intracochlear pressure in response to very high level sounds Auditory changes in awake guinea pigs exposed to overcompressed music Editorial Board Effects of ipsilateral, contralateral, and bilateral noise precursors on psychoacoustical tuning curves in humans
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1