Meaningful score changes for SF-36v2, FACIT-fatigue, and RASIQ in rheumatoid arthritis.

IF 2.4 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes Pub Date : 2024-01-22 DOI:10.1186/s41687-024-00685-0
Regina Rendas-Baum, Xiaochen Lin, Mark Kosinski, Jakob Bue Bjorner, Marguerite G Bracher, Wen-Hung Chen
{"title":"Meaningful score changes for SF-36v2, FACIT-fatigue, and RASIQ in rheumatoid arthritis.","authors":"Regina Rendas-Baum, Xiaochen Lin, Mark Kosinski, Jakob Bue Bjorner, Marguerite G Bracher, Wen-Hung Chen","doi":"10.1186/s41687-024-00685-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Interpretation thresholds for patient-reported outcome (PRO) scores are of crucial importance, particularly when interpreting treatment benefit. This study was designed to determine the within-patient meaningful improvement (WPMI) thresholds for the Short-Form 36 Health Survey version 2 (SF-36v2), the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue (FACIT-Fatigue), and the novel Rheumatoid Arthritis Symptoms and Impact Questionnaire (RASIQ) among patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this post-hoc analysis, anchor-based and supportive distribution-based methods were used to derive WPMI based on blinded data from all treatment arms in two Phase 2 RA trials with otilimab. Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (PtGA) was the general anchor for all SF-36v2 scales. SF-36 Patient's Global Impression of Status (PGIS), PtGA, and VT03 (an SF-36v2 item) were used as anchors for FACIT-Fatigue. SF-36 PGIS, PtGA, and Patient's Assessment of Arthritis Pain (PAIN) were anchors for RASIQ. Mean change was calculated for the anchor category associated with minimal meaningful improvement from baseline to Week 24 for SF-36v2 and FACIT-Fatigue, and to Week 12 for RASIQ. Sensitivity and specificity were used to evaluate the accuracy of estimated WPMI values.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For the SF-36v2 physical functioning, role physical, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role emotional, and mental health domains, anchor-based estimates of WPMI based on 0-100 scores were 24.5, 24.5, 25.4, 13.6, 21.5, 20.5, 16.9, and 14.3, respectively. Anchor-based WPMI estimates were 9.7 for the Physical Component Summary score and 7.6 for the Mental Component Summary score (using norm-based T-score metric). For FACIT-Fatigue (range 0-52), WPMI estimates ranged from 9.7 to 11.3 points. For RASIQ (range 0-100), anchor-based WPMI was determined as a change between -32.7 and -21.7 points for the Joint Pain scale, -26.7 to -23.7 for the Joint Stiffness scale, and -21.1 to -17.4 for the Impact scale.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study derived WPMI thresholds for SF-36v2, FACIT-Fatigue, and RASIQ among patients with RA, using multiple anchors. Derivation of WPMI thresholds for these PRO instruments will enable their broader use in evaluating and interpreting treatment benefit in future RA studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":36660,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10806967/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s41687-024-00685-0","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Interpretation thresholds for patient-reported outcome (PRO) scores are of crucial importance, particularly when interpreting treatment benefit. This study was designed to determine the within-patient meaningful improvement (WPMI) thresholds for the Short-Form 36 Health Survey version 2 (SF-36v2), the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue (FACIT-Fatigue), and the novel Rheumatoid Arthritis Symptoms and Impact Questionnaire (RASIQ) among patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA).

Methods: In this post-hoc analysis, anchor-based and supportive distribution-based methods were used to derive WPMI based on blinded data from all treatment arms in two Phase 2 RA trials with otilimab. Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (PtGA) was the general anchor for all SF-36v2 scales. SF-36 Patient's Global Impression of Status (PGIS), PtGA, and VT03 (an SF-36v2 item) were used as anchors for FACIT-Fatigue. SF-36 PGIS, PtGA, and Patient's Assessment of Arthritis Pain (PAIN) were anchors for RASIQ. Mean change was calculated for the anchor category associated with minimal meaningful improvement from baseline to Week 24 for SF-36v2 and FACIT-Fatigue, and to Week 12 for RASIQ. Sensitivity and specificity were used to evaluate the accuracy of estimated WPMI values.

Results: For the SF-36v2 physical functioning, role physical, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role emotional, and mental health domains, anchor-based estimates of WPMI based on 0-100 scores were 24.5, 24.5, 25.4, 13.6, 21.5, 20.5, 16.9, and 14.3, respectively. Anchor-based WPMI estimates were 9.7 for the Physical Component Summary score and 7.6 for the Mental Component Summary score (using norm-based T-score metric). For FACIT-Fatigue (range 0-52), WPMI estimates ranged from 9.7 to 11.3 points. For RASIQ (range 0-100), anchor-based WPMI was determined as a change between -32.7 and -21.7 points for the Joint Pain scale, -26.7 to -23.7 for the Joint Stiffness scale, and -21.1 to -17.4 for the Impact scale.

Conclusions: This study derived WPMI thresholds for SF-36v2, FACIT-Fatigue, and RASIQ among patients with RA, using multiple anchors. Derivation of WPMI thresholds for these PRO instruments will enable their broader use in evaluating and interpreting treatment benefit in future RA studies.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
类风湿性关节炎患者 SF-36v2、FACIT-疲劳和 RASIQ 的有意义评分变化。
背景:患者报告结果(PRO)评分的解释阈值至关重要,尤其是在解释治疗效果时。本研究旨在确定类风湿关节炎(RA)患者的短表 36 健康调查 2 版(SF-36v2)、慢性疾病治疗疲劳功能评估(FACIT-疲劳)以及新型类风湿关节炎症状和影响问卷(RASIQ)的患者内有意义改善(WPMI)阈值:在这项事后分析中,我们采用了基于锚的方法和基于支持性分布的方法,根据奥替利单抗两项2期RA试验中所有治疗组的盲法数据推导出WPMI。所有 SF-36v2 量表均以 "患者疾病活动度总体评估"(PtGA)为锚。SF-36 患者总体状态印象量表 (PGIS)、PtGA 和 VT03(SF-36v2 的一个项目)被用作 FACIT-Fatigue 的锚点。SF-36 PGIS、PtGA 和患者关节炎疼痛评估 (PAIN) 是 RASIQ 的锚点。计算 SF-36v2 和 FACIT-Fatigue 从基线到第 24 周以及 RASIQ 从基线到第 12 周与最小有意义改善相关的锚类别的平均变化。灵敏度和特异性用于评估WPMI估计值的准确性:对于 SF-36v2 身体功能、角色生理、身体疼痛、一般健康、活力、社会功能、角色情感和心理健康领域,基于 0-100 分的锚点估计 WPMI 值分别为 24.5、24.5、25.4、13.6、21.5、20.5、16.9 和 14.3。基于锚点的 WPMI 估计值为:身体成分总分 9.7 分,精神成分总分 7.6 分(使用基于常模的 T 评分标准)。对于 FACIT-疲劳(范围 0-52),WPMI 估计值介于 9.7 分至 11.3 分之间。对于 RASIQ(范围 0-100),基于锚点的 WPMI 被确定为关节疼痛量表的变化在 -32.7 到 -21.7 分之间,关节僵硬量表的变化在 -26.7 到 -23.7 之间,影响量表的变化在 -21.1 到 -17.4 之间:本研究通过使用多个锚点,为RA患者的SF-36v2、FACIT-疲劳和RASIQ得出了WPMI阈值。为这些PRO工具推导出WPMI阈值将使其在未来的RA研究中更广泛地用于评估和解释治疗效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes
Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes Health Professions-Health Information Management
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
7.40%
发文量
120
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊最新文献
Cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric validation of the Chichewa (Malawi) PedsQL™ 4.0 Generic Core Scales child self-report and PedsQL™ 4.0 GCS teen self-report Reliability and validity of the German version of the University of Jyvaskyla Active Aging Scale (UJACAS-G) APPROACH e-PROM system: a user-centered development and evaluation of an electronic patient-reported outcomes measurement system for management of coronary artery disease. A review of Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) for characterizing Long COVID (LC)-merits, gaps, and recommendations. The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on health-related quality of life of cancer patients in British Columbia.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1