A comparison of perceived barriers to optimal child sleep among families with low and high income

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Sleep Health Pub Date : 2024-04-01 DOI:10.1016/j.sleh.2023.12.004
Elizabeth L. Adams PhD , Amanda Edgar MS , Peyton Mosher MS , Sarah Burkart PhD , Bridget Armstrong PhD , R. Glenn Weaver PhD , Michael W. Beets PhD , E. Rebekah Siceloff PhD , Meghan Savidge MS , Roddrick Dugger PhD , Ronald J. Prinz PhD
{"title":"A comparison of perceived barriers to optimal child sleep among families with low and high income","authors":"Elizabeth L. Adams PhD ,&nbsp;Amanda Edgar MS ,&nbsp;Peyton Mosher MS ,&nbsp;Sarah Burkart PhD ,&nbsp;Bridget Armstrong PhD ,&nbsp;R. Glenn Weaver PhD ,&nbsp;Michael W. Beets PhD ,&nbsp;E. Rebekah Siceloff PhD ,&nbsp;Meghan Savidge MS ,&nbsp;Roddrick Dugger PhD ,&nbsp;Ronald J. Prinz PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.sleh.2023.12.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>Families with low-income experience suboptimal sleep compared to families with higher-income. Unique drivers likely contribute to these disparities, along with factors that universally impede sleep patterns, despite income level. To inform intervention tailoring, this mixed-methods study gathered parent’s perceptions about child sleep challenges to identify similarities/differences in families with lower-income and higher-income.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Parents who experienced difficulties with their child (ages 2-4<!--> <span>years) sleep were categorized as lower income (n = 15; $30,000 ± 17,845/year) or higher income (n = 15; $142,400 ± 61,373/year). Parents completed a survey and semistructured interview to explore barriers and facilitators for child sleep. Two coders independently evaluated transcripts for lower-income and higher-income groups using inductive analyses. Constant-comparison methods generated themes and characterized similarities/differences by income group.</span></p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Groups were similar in themes related to diverse bedtime routines, nighttime struggles with child sleep, parent strategies to reduce night wakings, parent effort to provide a sleep-promoting environment, and presence of electronic rules. Groups differed in themes related to factors influencing routine setting (eg, lower income: external factors influencing routines; higher income: personal attributes for structure), parent appraisal of child sleep (eg, higher income: ambivalence; lower income: mostly negative appraisal), nap timing and duration (eg, lower income: longer naps), and strategy utilization and pursuit of resources (eg, higher income: more parents tried various strategies and accessed online/print resources).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Parents experienced many similar barriers to child sleep, with a few distinct differences by income group. These findings can inform future intervention components for all families, as well as customized components to address the unique needs of families across income levels.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48545,"journal":{"name":"Sleep Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sleep Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352721823003121","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

Families with low-income experience suboptimal sleep compared to families with higher-income. Unique drivers likely contribute to these disparities, along with factors that universally impede sleep patterns, despite income level. To inform intervention tailoring, this mixed-methods study gathered parent’s perceptions about child sleep challenges to identify similarities/differences in families with lower-income and higher-income.

Methods

Parents who experienced difficulties with their child (ages 2-4 years) sleep were categorized as lower income (n = 15; $30,000 ± 17,845/year) or higher income (n = 15; $142,400 ± 61,373/year). Parents completed a survey and semistructured interview to explore barriers and facilitators for child sleep. Two coders independently evaluated transcripts for lower-income and higher-income groups using inductive analyses. Constant-comparison methods generated themes and characterized similarities/differences by income group.

Results

Groups were similar in themes related to diverse bedtime routines, nighttime struggles with child sleep, parent strategies to reduce night wakings, parent effort to provide a sleep-promoting environment, and presence of electronic rules. Groups differed in themes related to factors influencing routine setting (eg, lower income: external factors influencing routines; higher income: personal attributes for structure), parent appraisal of child sleep (eg, higher income: ambivalence; lower income: mostly negative appraisal), nap timing and duration (eg, lower income: longer naps), and strategy utilization and pursuit of resources (eg, higher income: more parents tried various strategies and accessed online/print resources).

Conclusions

Parents experienced many similar barriers to child sleep, with a few distinct differences by income group. These findings can inform future intervention components for all families, as well as customized components to address the unique needs of families across income levels.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
比较低收入家庭和高收入家庭在实现最佳儿童睡眠方面遇到的障碍。
目的:与高收入家庭相比,低收入家庭的睡眠质量较差。造成这些差异的可能是一些独特的驱动因素,以及一些普遍妨碍睡眠模式的因素,尽管收入水平不尽相同。为了给干预措施的定制提供信息,这项混合方法研究收集了家长对孩子睡眠问题的看法,以确定低收入家庭和高收入家庭的相似性/差异性:在孩子(2-4 岁)睡眠方面遇到困难的家长被分为低收入(n = 15;30,000 美元 ± 17,845 美元/年)和高收入(n = 15;142,400 美元 ± 61,373 美元/年)两类。家长们完成了一项调查和半结构化访谈,以探讨儿童睡眠的障碍和促进因素。两名编码员使用归纳分析法对低收入组和高收入组的记录誊本进行了独立评估。恒定比较法产生主题,并按收入组别描述相似性/差异性:各组在以下方面的主题相似:不同的睡前常规、夜间与孩子睡眠的斗争、父母减少夜醒的策略、父母提供促进睡眠环境的努力以及电子规则的存在。各组在以下方面存在差异:影响作息时间的因素(例如,收入较低:影响作息时间的外部因素;收入较高:结构的个人属性)、家长对儿童睡眠的评价(例如,收入较高:矛盾的评价;收入较低:大多是负面的评价)、午睡时间和持续时间(例如,收入较低:午睡时间较长)以及策略的利用和资源的寻求(例如,收入较高:更多家长尝试各种策略并获取在线/印刷资源):结论:父母在儿童睡眠方面遇到了许多类似的障碍,但不同收入群体之间存在一些明显的差异。这些发现可以为今后针对所有家庭的干预措施提供参考,也可以为满足不同收入水平家庭的独特需求提供定制的干预措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Sleep Health
Sleep Health CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
9.80%
发文量
114
审稿时长
54 days
期刊介绍: Sleep Health Journal of the National Sleep Foundation is a multidisciplinary journal that explores sleep''s role in population health and elucidates the social science perspective on sleep and health. Aligned with the National Sleep Foundation''s global authoritative, evidence-based voice for sleep health, the journal serves as the foremost publication for manuscripts that advance the sleep health of all members of society.The scope of the journal extends across diverse sleep-related fields, including anthropology, education, health services research, human development, international health, law, mental health, nursing, nutrition, psychology, public health, public policy, fatigue management, transportation, social work, and sociology. The journal welcomes original research articles, review articles, brief reports, special articles, letters to the editor, editorials, and commentaries.
期刊最新文献
Sleep health characteristics and positive mental health in Canadian youth: A cross-sectional analysis of the Health Behaviour in School-aged Children study. Bidirectional relationships between chronotype and sleep hygiene in children with and without parental history of alcohol use disorder. Phenotypes of sleep health among adults with chronic heart failure in a randomized controlled trial of cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia. Neighborhood social vulnerability as a mediator of racial disparities in insomnia severity. Sleep patterns in adolescents and associations with substance use.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1