Change motivation and mindfulness in individual psychotherapy: Examining a sample of adult outpatients with depression and/or anxiety

IF 2.5 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Journal of Clinical Psychology Pub Date : 2024-01-20 DOI:10.1002/jclp.23645
Ines Baumann, Julia Kalmar, Elena Gruber, Paul Blanck, Eva Vonderlin, Thomas Heidenreich, Johannes Mander
{"title":"Change motivation and mindfulness in individual psychotherapy: Examining a sample of adult outpatients with depression and/or anxiety","authors":"Ines Baumann,&nbsp;Julia Kalmar,&nbsp;Elena Gruber,&nbsp;Paul Blanck,&nbsp;Eva Vonderlin,&nbsp;Thomas Heidenreich,&nbsp;Johannes Mander","doi":"10.1002/jclp.23645","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>Existing literature has demonstrated that both motivation to change and mindfulness are associated with therapy outcomes in samples with mental disorders. Between the constructs of mindfulness and motivation to change occurs some theoretical-related and empirical overlap. However, it is still little known about the association of these two constructs. For this reason, we investigated the relationship of motivation to change and mindfulness in a sample of 116 adult outpatients with a primary diagnosis of depression or anxiety.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>An outpatient sample of 116 depressive and/or anxious patients filled in the German short version of the University of Rhode Island Change Assessment (URICA-S) and the German version of the Kentucky Inventory of Mindfulness Skills (KIMS) before the start of cognitive-behavioral therapy (pre) and after the 25th cognitive-behavioral therapy session (post). To assess the association between change motivation and mindfulness, we calculated correlations, hierarchical regressions and cross-lagged panel models (CLPM).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Several positive and negative significant correlations at the premeasurement time point, at the postmeasurement time point, and over time (from pre to postmeasurement time point) demonstrated a relation between the KIMS and the URICA-S. Hierarchical regression analyses and CLPM pointed towards relations between mindfulness and change motivation over time and in both directions for some subscales of the KIMS and the URICA-S.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>A bidirectional relation between motivation to change and mindfulness was supported in our naturalistic psychotherapy setting for several subscales. For a better understanding of the interconnection between the two constructs, future research should focus on the application of interventions to improve either mindfulness or motivation to change in psychotherapy. Additionally, the interactional effects of mindfulness and change motivation on therapy outcomes should be investigated.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":15395,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Psychology","volume":"80 3","pages":"646-663"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jclp.23645","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jclp.23645","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

Existing literature has demonstrated that both motivation to change and mindfulness are associated with therapy outcomes in samples with mental disorders. Between the constructs of mindfulness and motivation to change occurs some theoretical-related and empirical overlap. However, it is still little known about the association of these two constructs. For this reason, we investigated the relationship of motivation to change and mindfulness in a sample of 116 adult outpatients with a primary diagnosis of depression or anxiety.

Methods

An outpatient sample of 116 depressive and/or anxious patients filled in the German short version of the University of Rhode Island Change Assessment (URICA-S) and the German version of the Kentucky Inventory of Mindfulness Skills (KIMS) before the start of cognitive-behavioral therapy (pre) and after the 25th cognitive-behavioral therapy session (post). To assess the association between change motivation and mindfulness, we calculated correlations, hierarchical regressions and cross-lagged panel models (CLPM).

Results

Several positive and negative significant correlations at the premeasurement time point, at the postmeasurement time point, and over time (from pre to postmeasurement time point) demonstrated a relation between the KIMS and the URICA-S. Hierarchical regression analyses and CLPM pointed towards relations between mindfulness and change motivation over time and in both directions for some subscales of the KIMS and the URICA-S.

Conclusion

A bidirectional relation between motivation to change and mindfulness was supported in our naturalistic psychotherapy setting for several subscales. For a better understanding of the interconnection between the two constructs, future research should focus on the application of interventions to improve either mindfulness or motivation to change in psychotherapy. Additionally, the interactional effects of mindfulness and change motivation on therapy outcomes should be investigated.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
个体心理治疗中的改变动机和正念:研究抑郁症和/或焦虑症成人门诊患者样本。
研究目的现有文献表明,改变动机和正念都与精神障碍样本的治疗效果有关。在正念和改变动机这两个概念之间,存在一些理论上和经验上的重叠。然而,人们对这两个概念之间的关联仍然知之甚少。为此,我们对116名主要诊断为抑郁症或焦虑症的成年门诊患者进行了调查,以了解改变动机与正念之间的关系:方法:116 名抑郁症和/或焦虑症门诊患者在认知行为疗法开始前(前)和第 25 次认知行为疗法结束后(后),填写了罗德岛大学变化评估(URICA-S)德文简版和肯塔基正念技能量表(KIMS)德文版。为了评估改变动机与正念之间的关联,我们计算了相关性、分层回归和交叉滞后面板模型(CLPM):结果:在测量前时间点、测量后时间点以及随着时间的推移(从测量前到测量后时间点),KIMS和URICA-S之间存在一些正相关和负相关。层次回归分析和CLPM表明,在KIMS和URICA-S的某些分量表中,正念与改变动机之间存在双向关系:结论:在我们的自然心理治疗环境中,改变动机与正念之间的双向关系在几个分量表中得到了支持。为了更好地理解这两个概念之间的相互联系,未来的研究应侧重于在心理治疗中应用干预措施来提高正念或改变动机。此外,还应该研究正念和改变动机对治疗结果的交互影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Psychology
Journal of Clinical Psychology PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
3.30%
发文量
177
期刊介绍: Founded in 1945, the Journal of Clinical Psychology is a peer-reviewed forum devoted to research, assessment, and practice. Published eight times a year, the Journal includes research studies; articles on contemporary professional issues, single case research; brief reports (including dissertations in brief); notes from the field; and news and notes. In addition to papers on psychopathology, psychodiagnostics, and the psychotherapeutic process, the journal welcomes articles focusing on psychotherapy effectiveness research, psychological assessment and treatment matching, clinical outcomes, clinical health psychology, and behavioral medicine.
期刊最新文献
Managing Emotional Intensity Difficulties in Older Adults With Personality Disorders: A Proof-of-Concept Study. Treating Profound Shame States in Men With Antisocial Personality Disorder (ASPD) With Mentalisation-Based Treatment (MBT): A Case Illustration. A Qualitative Exploration of Post-Injury Challenges and the Potential Role of the PTSD Coach Mobile Application to Improve Recovery Among Acutely Injured Patients. Imagery Rescripting and Behavioural Experiments for Mental Contamination in Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder: A Case Illustration. Growing Pains: Lessons From A Process Group on Heartbreak.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1