Dementia care pathways in prisons - a comprehensive scoping review.

IF 3 Q1 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY Health and Justice Pub Date : 2024-01-20 DOI:10.1186/s40352-023-00252-7
Samantha Treacy, Steven Martin, Nelum Samarutilake, Veronica Phillips, Ben R Underwood, Tine Van Bortel
{"title":"Dementia care pathways in prisons - a comprehensive scoping review.","authors":"Samantha Treacy, Steven Martin, Nelum Samarutilake, Veronica Phillips, Ben R Underwood, Tine Van Bortel","doi":"10.1186/s40352-023-00252-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The number of older people in prison is growing. As a result, there will also be more prisoners suffering from dementia. The support and management of this population is likely to present multiple challenges to the prison system.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To examine the published literature on the care and supervision of people living in prison with dementia and on transitioning into the community; to identify good practice and recommendations that might inform the development of prison dementia care pathways.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A scoping review methodology was adopted with reporting guided by the PRISMA extension for scoping reviews checklist and explanation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixty-seven papers were included. Most of these were from high income countries, with the majority from the United Kingdom (n = 34), followed by the United States (n = 15), and Australia (n = 12). One further paper was from India.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The literature indicated that there were difficulties across the prison system for people with dementia along the pathway from reception to release and resettlement. These touched upon all aspects of prison life and its environment, including health and social care. A lack of resources and national and regional policies were identified as important barriers, although a number of solutions were also identified in the literature, including the development of locally tailored policies and increased collaboration with the voluntary sector.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>To our knowledge, this is the most comprehensive and inclusive review of the literature on dementia care pathways in prison to date. It has identified a number of important areas of concern and opportunities for future research across the prison system, and its operations. This will hopefully lead to the identification or adaptation of interventions to be implemented and evaluated, and facilitate the development of dementia care pathways in prisons.</p>","PeriodicalId":37843,"journal":{"name":"Health and Justice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10799435/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health and Justice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40352-023-00252-7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The number of older people in prison is growing. As a result, there will also be more prisoners suffering from dementia. The support and management of this population is likely to present multiple challenges to the prison system.

Objectives: To examine the published literature on the care and supervision of people living in prison with dementia and on transitioning into the community; to identify good practice and recommendations that might inform the development of prison dementia care pathways.

Methods: A scoping review methodology was adopted with reporting guided by the PRISMA extension for scoping reviews checklist and explanation.

Results: Sixty-seven papers were included. Most of these were from high income countries, with the majority from the United Kingdom (n = 34), followed by the United States (n = 15), and Australia (n = 12). One further paper was from India.

Discussion: The literature indicated that there were difficulties across the prison system for people with dementia along the pathway from reception to release and resettlement. These touched upon all aspects of prison life and its environment, including health and social care. A lack of resources and national and regional policies were identified as important barriers, although a number of solutions were also identified in the literature, including the development of locally tailored policies and increased collaboration with the voluntary sector.

Conclusion: To our knowledge, this is the most comprehensive and inclusive review of the literature on dementia care pathways in prison to date. It has identified a number of important areas of concern and opportunities for future research across the prison system, and its operations. This will hopefully lead to the identification or adaptation of interventions to be implemented and evaluated, and facilitate the development of dementia care pathways in prisons.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
监狱中的痴呆症护理路径--全面范围审查。
背景:监狱中的老年人越来越多。因此,患有痴呆症的囚犯也会越来越多。对这一人群的支持和管理可能会给监狱系统带来多重挑战:研究已发表的有关监狱痴呆症患者的护理和监管以及向社区过渡的文献;确定良好实践和建议,为制定监狱痴呆症护理路径提供参考:方法:采用范围界定综述方法,在 PRISMA 扩展范围界定综述核对表和解释的指导下进行报告:结果:共纳入 67 篇论文。其中大部分来自高收入国家,大多数来自英国(34 篇),其次是美国(15 篇)和澳大利亚(12 篇)。还有一篇论文来自印度:文献表明,在整个监狱系统中,痴呆症患者在从接收到释放和重新安置的过程中都会遇到困难。这些困难涉及监狱生活及其环境的方方面面,包括医疗和社会关怀。缺乏资源以及国家和地区政策被认为是重要的障碍,尽管文献中也指出了一些解决方案,包括制定适合当地情况的政策以及加强与志愿部门的合作:据我们所知,这是迄今为止对监狱中痴呆症护理路径的文献进行的最全面、最全面的综述。它确定了一些重要的关注领域,以及今后在监狱系统及其运作中开展研究的机会。希望这将有助于确定或调整要实施和评估的干预措施,并促进监狱痴呆症护理路径的发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Health and Justice
Health and Justice Social Sciences-Law
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
8.60%
发文量
34
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: Health & Justice is open to submissions from public health, criminology and criminal justice, medical science, psychology and clinical sciences, sociology, neuroscience, biology, anthropology and the social sciences, and covers a broad array of research types. It publishes original research, research notes (promising issues that are smaller in scope), commentaries, and translational notes (possible ways of introducing innovations in the justice system). Health & Justice aims to: Present original experimental research on the area of health and well-being of people involved in the adult or juvenile justice system, including people who work in the system; Present meta-analysis or systematic reviews in the area of health and justice for those involved in the justice system; Provide an arena to present new and upcoming scientific issues; Present translational science—the movement of scientific findings into practice including programs, procedures, or strategies; Present implementation science findings to advance the uptake and use of evidence-based practices; and, Present protocols and clinical practice guidelines. As an open access journal, Health & Justice aims for a broad reach, including researchers across many disciplines as well as justice practitioners (e.g. judges, prosecutors, defenders, probation officers, treatment providers, mental health and medical personnel working with justice-involved individuals, etc.). The sections of the journal devoted to translational and implementation sciences are primarily geared to practitioners and justice actors with special attention to the techniques used.
期刊最新文献
Changes in legal referrals to specialty substance use disorder treatment from 2015-2019. Pre and post diagnostic dementia care in four Scottish prisons. Correction: Cervical cancer screening barriers and facilitators from the perspectives of women with a history of criminal-legal system involvement and substance use. Impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on the experiences of incarcerated pregnant people. Facilitators and barriers to the implementation of the biobehavioral survey among incarcerated individuals and correctional personnel in Mozambique, 2021- a descriptive study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1