Higher Diet Quality Observed in Pregnant Women Compared to Women Living with and without Children in the US: NHANES 2011-2016.

IF 6.8 4区 医学 Q1 NUTRITION & DIETETICS Journal of the American Nutrition Association Pub Date : 2024-07-01 Epub Date: 2024-01-22 DOI:10.1080/27697061.2024.2302049
Opeyemi Adewumi, Oluwatobi Fijabi
{"title":"Higher Diet Quality Observed in Pregnant Women Compared to Women Living with and without Children in the US: NHANES 2011-2016.","authors":"Opeyemi Adewumi, Oluwatobi Fijabi","doi":"10.1080/27697061.2024.2302049","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Women of reproductive age are a critical part of the population because their dietary habits and nutritional status impact the nutritional trajectory of future generations. Various studies have assessed the diet quality among women of reproductive age, but few studies have compared the diet quality of these women across the different life stages.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare the diet quality among pregnant women, women living with children and women living without children in the United States of America (USA) using the Healthy Eating Index (HEI).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional study was a secondary data analysis of the National Health and Nutrition Survey (NHANES), 2011-2016. Study participants comprised a total of 7120 women, ages 20-44 years in one of three life stage categories, pregnant women, women living in households with and without children less than 18 years. The HEI 2015 was used to assess the overall diet quality score as well as 13 dietary component scores-whole fruit, total fruit, greens and beans, whole grains, total vegetables, total protein foods, fatty acids, seafood and plant proteins, dairy, saturated fat, sodium, refined grains, and added sugars. The differences in HEI scores by life stage was assessed using linear regression models, adjusting for marital status, age, race and ethnicity, poverty index ratio, and educational status.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean overall HEI score of participants was 52.0 out of 100 points. The overall HEI scores of pregnant women was significantly higher than women living with and without children respectively (β = 4.6 ± 1.42, <i>p</i> = 0.002; β = 3.7 ± 1.34, <i>p</i> = 0.009). Also, pregnant women had significantly higher scores for whole fruit (β = 0.99 ± 0.18, <i>p</i> < 0.001; β = 0.98 ± 0.17, <i>p</i> < 0.001), dairy (β = 0.63 ± 0.27, <i>p</i> = 0.02; β = 0.68 ± 0.29, <i>p</i> = 0.02) and whole grains (β = 1.05 ± 0.40, <i>p</i> = 0.01; β = 0.97 ± 0.39, <i>p</i> = 0.02) than women living with and without children respectively. On the other hand, women living without children had significantly higher scores for total vegetables (β = 0.18 ± 2.04, <i>p</i> = 0.002), refined grains (β = 0.22 ± 0.10, <i>p</i> = 0.03) and added sugars (β = 0.35 ± 0.16, <i>p</i> = 0.04) than women living with children.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Pregnant women had the highest diet quality while women living in households with children had the lowest diet quality among the studied population.</p>","PeriodicalId":29768,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Nutrition Association","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Nutrition Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/27697061.2024.2302049","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Women of reproductive age are a critical part of the population because their dietary habits and nutritional status impact the nutritional trajectory of future generations. Various studies have assessed the diet quality among women of reproductive age, but few studies have compared the diet quality of these women across the different life stages.

Objective: To compare the diet quality among pregnant women, women living with children and women living without children in the United States of America (USA) using the Healthy Eating Index (HEI).

Methods: This cross-sectional study was a secondary data analysis of the National Health and Nutrition Survey (NHANES), 2011-2016. Study participants comprised a total of 7120 women, ages 20-44 years in one of three life stage categories, pregnant women, women living in households with and without children less than 18 years. The HEI 2015 was used to assess the overall diet quality score as well as 13 dietary component scores-whole fruit, total fruit, greens and beans, whole grains, total vegetables, total protein foods, fatty acids, seafood and plant proteins, dairy, saturated fat, sodium, refined grains, and added sugars. The differences in HEI scores by life stage was assessed using linear regression models, adjusting for marital status, age, race and ethnicity, poverty index ratio, and educational status.

Results: The mean overall HEI score of participants was 52.0 out of 100 points. The overall HEI scores of pregnant women was significantly higher than women living with and without children respectively (β = 4.6 ± 1.42, p = 0.002; β = 3.7 ± 1.34, p = 0.009). Also, pregnant women had significantly higher scores for whole fruit (β = 0.99 ± 0.18, p < 0.001; β = 0.98 ± 0.17, p < 0.001), dairy (β = 0.63 ± 0.27, p = 0.02; β = 0.68 ± 0.29, p = 0.02) and whole grains (β = 1.05 ± 0.40, p = 0.01; β = 0.97 ± 0.39, p = 0.02) than women living with and without children respectively. On the other hand, women living without children had significantly higher scores for total vegetables (β = 0.18 ± 2.04, p = 0.002), refined grains (β = 0.22 ± 0.10, p = 0.03) and added sugars (β = 0.35 ± 0.16, p = 0.04) than women living with children.

Conclusion: Pregnant women had the highest diet quality while women living in households with children had the lowest diet quality among the studied population.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在美国,与有孩子和没有孩子的妇女相比,孕妇的饮食质量更高:2011-2016 年国家健康调查》。
背景:育龄妇女是人口的重要组成部分,因为她们的饮食习惯和营养状况影响着后代的营养轨迹。各种研究对育龄妇女的饮食质量进行了评估,但很少有研究对这些妇女在不同生命阶段的饮食质量进行比较:使用健康饮食指数(HEI)比较美利坚合众国(USA)孕妇、有子女妇女和无子女妇女的饮食质量:这项横断面研究是对 2011-2016 年全国健康与营养调查(NHANES)的二次数据分析。研究参与者包括年龄在 20-44 岁之间、处于三个生命阶段类别之一的 7120 名女性、孕妇、居住在有或没有 18 岁以下子女家庭中的女性。HEI 2015 用于评估总体膳食质量得分以及 13 个膳食成分得分--全水果、水果总量、绿色蔬菜和豆类、全谷物、蔬菜总量、蛋白质食物总量、脂肪酸、海鲜和植物蛋白、乳制品、饱和脂肪、钠、精制谷物和添加糖。使用线性回归模型评估了不同生命阶段 HEI 分数的差异,并对婚姻状况、年龄、种族和民族、贫困指数比和教育状况进行了调整:参与者的 HEI 总平均分为 52.0 分(满分 100 分)。孕妇的 HEI 总分明显高于有子女和无子女的妇女(β = 4.6 ± 1.42,p = 0.002;β = 3.7 ± 1.34,p = 0.009)。此外,孕妇对全水果(β = 0.99 ± 0.18,p < 0.001;β = 0.98 ± 0.17,p < 0.001)、奶制品(β = 0.63 ± 0.27,p = 0.02;β = 0.68 ± 0.29,p = 0.02)和全谷物(β = 1.05 ± 0.40,p = 0.01;β = 0.97 ± 0.39,p = 0.02)分别高于有子女和无子女的妇女。另一方面,无子女妇女在蔬菜总量(β = 0.18 ± 2.04,p = 0.002)、精制谷物(β = 0.22 ± 0.10,p = 0.03)和添加糖(β = 0.35 ± 0.16,p = 0.04)方面的得分明显高于有子女妇女:结论:在研究人群中,孕妇的饮食质量最高,而有子女家庭的妇女饮食质量最低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Effect of Meal Frequency on Body Composition, Biochemical Parameters and Diet Quality in Overweight/Obese Individuals. Associations between Vitamin D Levels and Insulin Resistance in Non-Diabetic Obesity: Results from NHANES 2001-2018. Effect of Pleurotus ostreatus Water Extract Consumption on Blood Parameters and Cytokine Values in Healthy Volunteers. Effects of Acute Ingestion of Guarana (Paullinia Cupana) on Soccer Player Performance: A Randomized, Cross-over, Placebo-Controlled Study. The Role of Exercise: Physical Fitness Changes Caused by Hypocaloric Diet and Exercise in Men Who Are Overweight.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1