Attention control in preterm and term 5-month-old infants: Cross-task stability increases with gestational age

IF 2 2区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL Infancy Pub Date : 2024-01-20 DOI:10.1111/infa.12574
Oliver Perra, Alice Winstanley, Rebecca Sperotto, Merideth Gattis
{"title":"Attention control in preterm and term 5-month-old infants: Cross-task stability increases with gestational age","authors":"Oliver Perra,&nbsp;Alice Winstanley,&nbsp;Rebecca Sperotto,&nbsp;Merideth Gattis","doi":"10.1111/infa.12574","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Cross-task stability refers to performance consistency across different settings and measures of the same construct. Cross-task stability can help us understand developmental processes, including how risks such as preterm birth affect outcomes. We investigated cross-task stability of attention control in 32 preterm and 39 term infants. All infants had the same chronological age at time of testing (5 months) but varied in gestational age (GA) at birth (30–42 weeks). Infants completed an experimental attention following task with a researcher and a naturalistic play observation with their mothers. Both preterm and term infants demonstrated attention following in the experimental task. GA and flexibility of attention were related: the likelihood of no turn trials decreased with increasing GA. To evaluate cross-task stability, we compared attention performance in the experimental and naturalistic settings. Flexible attention shifts on the experimental task were positively related to attention to objects in the naturalistic observation. Furthermore, the association between flexible attention shifts on the experimental task and attention to objects in the naturalistic observation was moderated by GA. Our study provides initial evidence that the consolidation of attention control increases with GA. These findings highlight the value of comparing experimental and observational measures of attention.</p>","PeriodicalId":47895,"journal":{"name":"Infancy","volume":"29 3","pages":"437-458"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/infa.12574","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Infancy","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/infa.12574","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Cross-task stability refers to performance consistency across different settings and measures of the same construct. Cross-task stability can help us understand developmental processes, including how risks such as preterm birth affect outcomes. We investigated cross-task stability of attention control in 32 preterm and 39 term infants. All infants had the same chronological age at time of testing (5 months) but varied in gestational age (GA) at birth (30–42 weeks). Infants completed an experimental attention following task with a researcher and a naturalistic play observation with their mothers. Both preterm and term infants demonstrated attention following in the experimental task. GA and flexibility of attention were related: the likelihood of no turn trials decreased with increasing GA. To evaluate cross-task stability, we compared attention performance in the experimental and naturalistic settings. Flexible attention shifts on the experimental task were positively related to attention to objects in the naturalistic observation. Furthermore, the association between flexible attention shifts on the experimental task and attention to objects in the naturalistic observation was moderated by GA. Our study provides initial evidence that the consolidation of attention control increases with GA. These findings highlight the value of comparing experimental and observational measures of attention.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
早产儿和 5 个月足月儿的注意力控制:跨任务稳定性随胎龄增长而增加。
跨任务稳定性指的是在不同的环境下和对同一结构进行测量时的表现一致性。跨任务稳定性有助于我们了解发育过程,包括早产等风险如何影响发育结果。我们调查了 32 名早产儿和 39 名足月儿在注意力控制方面的跨任务稳定性。所有婴儿接受测试时的年龄(5 个月)相同,但出生时的胎龄(30-42 周)不同。婴儿与研究人员一起完成了一项注意力跟踪实验任务,并与母亲一起完成了一项自然游戏观察任务。早产儿和足月儿在实验任务中都表现出了注意追随。性别差异与注意力的灵活性有关:随着性别差异的增加,无转向试验的可能性降低。为了评估跨任务的稳定性,我们比较了实验环境和自然环境中的注意力表现。实验任务中的灵活注意力转移与自然观察中对物体的注意力呈正相关。此外,实验任务中的灵活注意转移与自然观察中对物体的注意之间的关联受 GA 的调节。我们的研究提供了初步证据,证明注意力控制的巩固会随着 GA 的增加而增加。这些发现凸显了将注意力的实验测量与观察测量进行比较的价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Infancy
Infancy PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL-
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
7.70%
发文量
72
期刊介绍: Infancy, the official journal of the International Society on Infant Studies, emphasizes the highest quality original research on normal and aberrant infant development during the first two years. Both human and animal research are included. In addition to regular length research articles and brief reports (3000-word maximum), the journal includes solicited target articles along with a series of commentaries; debates, in which different theoretical positions are presented along with a series of commentaries; and thematic collections, a group of three to five reports or summaries of research on the same issue, conducted independently at different laboratories, with invited commentaries.
期刊最新文献
The Dynamics of Looking and Smiling Differ for Young Infants at Elevated Likelihood for ASD. The Association of Spousal Relationship Quality and Social Support With Maternal-Infant Bonding: Moderating Roles of Maternal Age and Paternal Occupation. The Active Infant's Developing Role in Musical Interactions: Insights From an Online Parent Questionnaire. Cultural Differences in Visual Attention Emerge in Infancy. Emotional Movement Kinematics Guide Twelve-Month-Olds' Visual, but Not Manual, Exploration.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1