Development and Content Validation of the 10-item Well-being Instrument (WiX) for use in Economic Evaluation Studies

IF 2.8 3区 社会学 Q1 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY Applied Research in Quality of Life Pub Date : 2024-01-22 DOI:10.1007/s11482-023-10241-5
Daphne C. Voormolen, Judith A. M. Bom, Esther W. de Bekker-Grob, Werner B. F. Brouwer, Job van Exel
{"title":"Development and Content Validation of the 10-item Well-being Instrument (WiX) for use in Economic Evaluation Studies","authors":"Daphne C. Voormolen,&nbsp;Judith A. M. Bom,&nbsp;Esther W. de Bekker-Grob,&nbsp;Werner B. F. Brouwer,&nbsp;Job van Exel","doi":"10.1007/s11482-023-10241-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>It’s increasingly recognized that the evaluative space of economic evaluations in health and social care needs to be broadened and instruments measuring well-being are required. A generic measure of well-being comprehensively capturing all relevant domains of well-being in the adult population is not available. The aim is to describe the development of such an instrument, the 10-item Well-being instrument (WiX), and to report the findings from a content validation study. A draft version of the instrument was based on available instruments pursuing the same aim, a comprehensive theoretical framework of the domains of well-being, and recent empirical evidence from the general population about the constituents of well-being. Content validation was conducted following COSMIN methodology and investigated relevance, comprehensiveness, and comprehensibility. In the qualitative content validation, semi-structured interviews were conducted with experts and members of the general population. During quantitative content validation, a representative sample (<i>n</i> = 501) from the general population completed an online survey. The qualitative validation showed the relevance and comprehensiveness of the WiX were adequate, but several changes were made to consecutive draft versions of the items and their descriptions and response levels to improve comprehensibility. The quantitative validation confirmed these findings and resulted in some additional, minor changes. A new instrument aiming to capture overall (or general) quality-of-life in terms of subjective well-being by measuring how satisfied people are on ten important domains of life in the adult general population was developed. The content validation results are encouraging, but further validation and valuation steps are necessary before the WiX can be used in (economic) evaluation studies of interventions with impacts broader than health.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51483,"journal":{"name":"Applied Research in Quality of Life","volume":"19 2","pages":"381 - 413"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11482-023-10241-5.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Research in Quality of Life","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11482-023-10241-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

It’s increasingly recognized that the evaluative space of economic evaluations in health and social care needs to be broadened and instruments measuring well-being are required. A generic measure of well-being comprehensively capturing all relevant domains of well-being in the adult population is not available. The aim is to describe the development of such an instrument, the 10-item Well-being instrument (WiX), and to report the findings from a content validation study. A draft version of the instrument was based on available instruments pursuing the same aim, a comprehensive theoretical framework of the domains of well-being, and recent empirical evidence from the general population about the constituents of well-being. Content validation was conducted following COSMIN methodology and investigated relevance, comprehensiveness, and comprehensibility. In the qualitative content validation, semi-structured interviews were conducted with experts and members of the general population. During quantitative content validation, a representative sample (n = 501) from the general population completed an online survey. The qualitative validation showed the relevance and comprehensiveness of the WiX were adequate, but several changes were made to consecutive draft versions of the items and their descriptions and response levels to improve comprehensibility. The quantitative validation confirmed these findings and resulted in some additional, minor changes. A new instrument aiming to capture overall (or general) quality-of-life in terms of subjective well-being by measuring how satisfied people are on ten important domains of life in the adult general population was developed. The content validation results are encouraging, but further validation and valuation steps are necessary before the WiX can be used in (economic) evaluation studies of interventions with impacts broader than health.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在经济评估研究中使用的 10 项幸福指数工具 (WiX) 的开发和内容验证
越来越多的人认识到,需要拓宽医疗和社会护理领域经济评价的空间,并需要衡量幸福感的工具。目前还没有一种通用的幸福感测量方法,能够全面反映成人幸福感的所有相关领域。本文旨在介绍此类工具--10 项幸福感工具 (WiX) 的开发情况,并报告内容验证研究的结果。该工具的草案版本是以追求相同目标的现有工具、幸福感领域的综合理论框架以及最近从普通人群中获得的有关幸福感构成要素的经验证据为基础的。按照 COSMIN 方法进行了内容验证,并对相关性、全面性和可理解性进行了调查。在定性内容验证中,对专家和普通民众进行了半结构化访谈。在定量内容验证中,来自普通民众的代表性样本(n = 501)完成了在线调查。定性验证结果表明,WiX 的相关性和全面性是充分的,但为了提高可理解性,对连续草案版本的项目及其描述和回答水平做了一些修改。定量验证证实了这些结果,并做出了一些额外的小改动。我们开发了一种新的工具,旨在通过测量成年普通人群对十个重要生活领域的满意程度,从主观幸福感的角度来反映总体(或一般)生活质量。内容验证结果令人鼓舞,但还需要进一步的验证和估价步骤,才能将 WiX 用于影响范围比健康更广的干预措施的(经济)评估研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Applied Research in Quality of Life
Applied Research in Quality of Life SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
11.80%
发文量
90
期刊介绍: The aim of this journal is to publish conceptual, methodological and empirical papers dealing with quality-of-life studies in the applied areas of the natural and social sciences. As the official journal of the ISQOLS, it is designed to attract papers that have direct implications for, or impact on practical applications of research on the quality-of-life. We welcome papers crafted from interdisciplinary, inter-professional and international perspectives. This research should guide decision making in a variety of professions, industries, nonprofit, and government sectors, including healthcare, travel and tourism, marketing, corporate management, community planning, social work, public administration, and human resource management. The goal is to help decision makers apply performance measures and outcome assessment techniques based on concepts such as well-being, human satisfaction, human development, happiness, wellness and quality-of-life. The Editorial Review Board is divided into specific sections indicating the broad scope of practice covered by the journal. The section editors are distinguished scholars from many countries across the globe.
期刊最新文献
Correction: Longitudinal Associations between Cyberbullying Victimization and Cognitive and Affective Components of Subjective Well-Being in Adolescents: A Network Analysis Correction: Care Planning in Ageing Families During the COVID-19 Pandemic and Social Unrest in Hong Kong Housing Tenure and Subjective Wellbeing: The Importance of Public Housing “Withdrawal Syndrome”: The Effects of Acts of Microaggression in the Classroom on Racialized Students Parental Aggravation, Parenting Behaviors, Child Self-Control and Externalizing Problems in Singapore: Evidence from a Nationally Representative Sample
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1