Public stigma and recognition of perinatal obsessive-compulsive disorder

IF 16.4 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Accounts of Chemical Research Pub Date : 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jocrd.2024.100858
Danielle L. Cooke , Ryan J. McCarty , Sierra Budd , Ashley Ordway , Dikea Roussos-Ross , Carol A. Mathews , Joseph P.H. McNamara , Andrea D. Guastello
{"title":"Public stigma and recognition of perinatal obsessive-compulsive disorder","authors":"Danielle L. Cooke ,&nbsp;Ryan J. McCarty ,&nbsp;Sierra Budd ,&nbsp;Ashley Ordway ,&nbsp;Dikea Roussos-Ross ,&nbsp;Carol A. Mathews ,&nbsp;Joseph P.H. McNamara ,&nbsp;Andrea D. Guastello","doi":"10.1016/j.jocrd.2024.100858","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Stigma is a barrier to disclosure of psychiatric symptoms and treatment seeking among perinatal patients, including those with perinatal obsessive-compulsive disorder (POCD), perinatal depression (PPD), and postpartum psychosis (PPP). This study examines the relationship between stigma, illness recognition, and familiarity with illness in six distinct postpartum experiences. In a cross-sectional online survey, participants (N = 572) were randomized to one of six postpartum vignettes: subclinical, depression, psychosis, and three subtypes of obsessive-compulsive disorder: contamination, responsibility for harm, and sexual content. Participants were asked to provide a diagnostic label of the condition and rate different aspects of stigma. Sexual content POCD, responsibility for harm content POCD, and the subclinical vignettes were less likely to be accurately recognized than PPD, contamination POCD, and PPP. A multivariate analysis of variance revealed the sexual POCD and PPP vignettes were met with the highest level of stigma, while the subclinical condition, PPD, and contamination POCD were met with the lowest levels of stigma. Significant interactions were present between accurate recognition of the condition and type of vignette on stigma variables, with recognition generally being associated with lower stigma for POCD and PPD. This demonstrates the need for comprehensive educational efforts on perinatal mental health.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211364924000022","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Stigma is a barrier to disclosure of psychiatric symptoms and treatment seeking among perinatal patients, including those with perinatal obsessive-compulsive disorder (POCD), perinatal depression (PPD), and postpartum psychosis (PPP). This study examines the relationship between stigma, illness recognition, and familiarity with illness in six distinct postpartum experiences. In a cross-sectional online survey, participants (N = 572) were randomized to one of six postpartum vignettes: subclinical, depression, psychosis, and three subtypes of obsessive-compulsive disorder: contamination, responsibility for harm, and sexual content. Participants were asked to provide a diagnostic label of the condition and rate different aspects of stigma. Sexual content POCD, responsibility for harm content POCD, and the subclinical vignettes were less likely to be accurately recognized than PPD, contamination POCD, and PPP. A multivariate analysis of variance revealed the sexual POCD and PPP vignettes were met with the highest level of stigma, while the subclinical condition, PPD, and contamination POCD were met with the lowest levels of stigma. Significant interactions were present between accurate recognition of the condition and type of vignette on stigma variables, with recognition generally being associated with lower stigma for POCD and PPD. This demonstrates the need for comprehensive educational efforts on perinatal mental health.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
公众对围产期强迫症的偏见和认识
污名化是围产期患者(包括围产期强迫症(POCD)、围产期抑郁症(PPD)和产后精神病(PPP)患者)披露精神症状和寻求治疗的障碍。本研究探讨了六种不同的产后经历中污名化、疾病认知和疾病熟悉程度之间的关系。在一项横断面在线调查中,参与者(N = 572)被随机分配到六个产后小故事中的一个:亚临床型、抑郁症、精神病和强迫症的三个亚型:污染、伤害责任和性内容。要求参与者提供病情的诊断标签,并对成见的不同方面进行评分。性内容强迫症、伤害责任强迫症和亚临床小故事被准确识别的几率要低于PPD、污染强迫症和PPP。多变量方差分析显示,性 POCD 和 PPP 小节的污名化程度最高,而亚临床条件、PPD 和污染 POCD 的污名化程度最低。对病情的准确识别和小故事的类型对成见变量之间存在显著的交互作用,对 POCD 和 PPD 的识别通常与较低的成见相关。这表明有必要对围产期心理健康开展全面的教育工作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Accounts of Chemical Research
Accounts of Chemical Research 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
31.40
自引率
1.10%
发文量
312
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance. Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.
期刊最新文献
Management of Cholesteatoma: Hearing Rehabilitation. Congenital Cholesteatoma. Evaluation of Cholesteatoma. Management of Cholesteatoma: Extension Beyond Middle Ear/Mastoid. Recidivism and Recurrence.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1