Role Models in Action Through YouTube Videos for Engineering Community College Students

IF 1.9 3区 教育学 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Research in Higher Education Pub Date : 2024-01-22 DOI:10.1007/s11162-023-09772-5
Hye Rin Lee, Teomara Rutherford, Paul Hanselman, Fernando Rodriguez, Kevin F. Ramirez, Jacquelynne S. Eccles
{"title":"Role Models in Action Through YouTube Videos for Engineering Community College Students","authors":"Hye Rin Lee, Teomara Rutherford, Paul Hanselman, Fernando Rodriguez, Kevin F. Ramirez, Jacquelynne S. Eccles","doi":"10.1007/s11162-023-09772-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Community colleges provide broad access to a college degree due to their less expensive tuition, greater course time offerings, and more open admission policies compared to four-year universities as reported (Juszkiewicz, 2015). These institutions have great potential to diversify who chooses STEM, such as engineering. Such diverse representation is important, because students from different backgrounds can contribute new perspectives that foster creative and innovative approaches to solving problems. However, approximately 40% of the students who enter community college in the U.S. leave before graduation (Xu &amp; Jaggars, 2011). Harnessing the power of social media to reduce attrition, we tested a pilot intervention in which community college students in engineering courses completed a reflection exercise after watching YouTube videos of former engineering students from similar backgrounds who successfully transferred to a four-year college. Quasi-experimental analyses (<i>N</i> = 537) show that students in the intervention received higher engineering course grades and had greater odds of enrolling in an engineering course in the subsequent term compared to those who were not in the intervention. Additionally, we find support for the hypothesis that the intervention has larger benefits for women. Results suggest that hearing from other students about their engineering experience can be a useful tool for improving community college students’ choices and performance.</p>","PeriodicalId":48200,"journal":{"name":"Research in Higher Education","volume":"20 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in Higher Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-023-09772-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Community colleges provide broad access to a college degree due to their less expensive tuition, greater course time offerings, and more open admission policies compared to four-year universities as reported (Juszkiewicz, 2015). These institutions have great potential to diversify who chooses STEM, such as engineering. Such diverse representation is important, because students from different backgrounds can contribute new perspectives that foster creative and innovative approaches to solving problems. However, approximately 40% of the students who enter community college in the U.S. leave before graduation (Xu & Jaggars, 2011). Harnessing the power of social media to reduce attrition, we tested a pilot intervention in which community college students in engineering courses completed a reflection exercise after watching YouTube videos of former engineering students from similar backgrounds who successfully transferred to a four-year college. Quasi-experimental analyses (N = 537) show that students in the intervention received higher engineering course grades and had greater odds of enrolling in an engineering course in the subsequent term compared to those who were not in the intervention. Additionally, we find support for the hypothesis that the intervention has larger benefits for women. Results suggest that hearing from other students about their engineering experience can be a useful tool for improving community college students’ choices and performance.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过 YouTube 视频为社区工程学院学生树立行动榜样
据报道(Juszkiewicz,2015 年),与四年制大学相比,社区学院的学费更低廉、课程时间更充裕、招生政策更开放,因此社区学院提供了获得大学学位的广泛机会。这些院校具有很大的潜力,可以使选择 STEM(如工程学)的学生多样化。这种多样化的代表性非常重要,因为来自不同背景的学生可以贡献出新的视角,从而培养出解决问题的创造性和创新性方法。然而,在美国,大约 40% 进入社区大学的学生在毕业前就离开了(Xu & Jaggars, 2011)。利用社交媒体的力量来减少流失,我们测试了一项试点干预措施,让社区大学工程学课程的学生在观看 YouTube 上背景相似、成功转入四年制大学的前工程学学生的视频后,完成一项反思练习。准实验分析(N = 537)显示,与未参与干预的学生相比,参与干预的学生获得了更高的工程学课程成绩,并且在下学期注册工程学课程的几率更大。此外,我们还发现,干预对女性的益处更大,这一假设得到了支持。结果表明,听取其他学生的工程学经验可以成为改善社区大学学生的选择和成绩的有用工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Research in Higher Education
Research in Higher Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
9.50%
发文量
52
期刊介绍: Research in Higher Education publishes studies that examine issues pertaining to postsecondary education. The journal is open to studies using a wide range of methods, but has particular interest in studies that apply advanced quantitative research methods to issues in postsecondary education or address postsecondary education policy issues. Among the topics of interest to the journal are: access and retention; student success; equity; faculty issues; institutional productivity and assessment; postsecondary education governance; curriculum and instruction; state and federal higher education policy; and financing of postsecondary education. The journal encourages submissions from scholars in disciplines outside of higher education, and studies from outside the United States that address issues that are of interest to the readership. The journal will on occasion publish short notes of a methodological nature, literature reviews of topics pertaining to postsecondary research, and “research and practice” studies illustrating how postsecondary research can inform decision making.
期刊最新文献
Assessing the Psychometric Properties of Quality Experience in Undergraduate Research Using Item Response Theory Discrimination or a Competitive Climate? Why Women Cannot Translate Their Better High School Grades into University Grades Mapping the Occupations of Recent Graduates. The Role of Academic Background in the Digital Era Less is more, or is it? Age and Gender Differences in How Students Build Momentum toward College Graduation The Relationship Between Low-Income College Students’ Time Use and Well-Being: A Mixed Methods Exploration
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1