{"title":"Categorization of manufacturing companies’ readiness profiles for the transition to the circular economy: A multidimensional cluster analysis","authors":"Thayla Zomer, Tim McAloone, Daniela Pigosso","doi":"10.1111/jiec.13460","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The circular economy (CE) field has moved from purely conceptual research into empirical studies. However, the literature does not provide generalized conclusions regarding the overall state of CE transition in manufacturing companies. Existing studies lack a perspective in explaining differences among companies planning or already transitioning to the CE because most empirical research so far is based on single or few case studies, generally assuming that the transition to CE, once undertaken as a purpose, moves along a continuum from a linear model to a circular one. This paper identifies differences among manufacturing companies planning and transitioning to CE and conceptualizes readiness profiles along eight dimensions of change identified in the literature as essential to CE implementation in organizations. A cluster analysis of a sample of manufacturing companies from different sectors, sizes, and locations identified five readiness profiles: the laggards, the explorers, the frontrunners, the strategizers, and the information oriented. The results show that companies may follow different approaches when exploring the potential of CE in their businesses. While some companies decide to explore and experiment across all dimensions of change, others follow a more strategic or operational approach, suggesting different states in which companies find themselves. The findings offer evidence of the change happening across the manufacturing industry and how CE transition unfolds in practice, extending existing literature by providing more overall conclusions on how the transition might unfold in manufacturing companies and different states that companies might be regarding the multiple dimensions of change that should be considered.</p>","PeriodicalId":16050,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Industrial Ecology","volume":"28 2","pages":"277-288"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Industrial Ecology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jiec.13460","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The circular economy (CE) field has moved from purely conceptual research into empirical studies. However, the literature does not provide generalized conclusions regarding the overall state of CE transition in manufacturing companies. Existing studies lack a perspective in explaining differences among companies planning or already transitioning to the CE because most empirical research so far is based on single or few case studies, generally assuming that the transition to CE, once undertaken as a purpose, moves along a continuum from a linear model to a circular one. This paper identifies differences among manufacturing companies planning and transitioning to CE and conceptualizes readiness profiles along eight dimensions of change identified in the literature as essential to CE implementation in organizations. A cluster analysis of a sample of manufacturing companies from different sectors, sizes, and locations identified five readiness profiles: the laggards, the explorers, the frontrunners, the strategizers, and the information oriented. The results show that companies may follow different approaches when exploring the potential of CE in their businesses. While some companies decide to explore and experiment across all dimensions of change, others follow a more strategic or operational approach, suggesting different states in which companies find themselves. The findings offer evidence of the change happening across the manufacturing industry and how CE transition unfolds in practice, extending existing literature by providing more overall conclusions on how the transition might unfold in manufacturing companies and different states that companies might be regarding the multiple dimensions of change that should be considered.
循环经济(CE)领域已经从纯粹的概念研究转向实证研究。然而,文献并没有就制造企业向循环经济转型的整体状况提供概括性结论。现有研究在解释计划或已经向 CE 过渡的公司之间的差异方面缺乏视角,因为迄今为止的大多数实证研究都是基于单个或少数几个案例研究,通常假设向 CE 过渡一旦成为目的,就会沿着从线性模式到循环模式的连续统一体前进。本文确定了计划向行政首长协调会过渡的制造企业之间的差异,并根据文献中确定的对企业实施行政首长协调会至关重要的八个变革维度对准备情况进行了概念化。通过对不同行业、规模和地点的制造企业样本进行聚类分析,确定了五种准备状况:落后者、探索者、领先者、战略制定者和信息导向者。研究结果表明,企业在探索消费电子产品在其业务中的潜力时,可能会采取不同的方法。一些公司决定在变革的所有方面进行探索和试验,而另一些公司则采取更具战略性或操作性的方法,这表明公司所处的状态各不相同。研究结果为整个制造业正在发生的变化以及行政首长协调会的转型如何在实践中展开提供了证据,通过对制造业公司如何展开转型以及公司在应考虑的多个变革方面可能处于的不同状态提供更全面的结论,从而扩展了现有文献。
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Industrial Ecology addresses a series of related topics:
material and energy flows studies (''industrial metabolism'')
technological change
dematerialization and decarbonization
life cycle planning, design and assessment
design for the environment
extended producer responsibility (''product stewardship'')
eco-industrial parks (''industrial symbiosis'')
product-oriented environmental policy
eco-efficiency
Journal of Industrial Ecology is open to and encourages submissions that are interdisciplinary in approach. In addition to more formal academic papers, the journal seeks to provide a forum for continuing exchange of information and opinions through contributions from scholars, environmental managers, policymakers, advocates and others involved in environmental science, management and policy.