Acute and Extended Anxiolytic Effects of Cannabidiol in Cannabis Flower: A Quasi-Experimental ad libitum Use Study.

IF 3.1 4区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research Pub Date : 2024-08-01 Epub Date: 2024-01-22 DOI:10.1089/can.2023.0187
L Cinnamon Bidwell, Renée Martin-Willett, Carillon Skrzynski, Jonathon Lisano, Marco Ortiz Torres, Gregory Giordano, Kent E Hutchison, Angela D Bryan
{"title":"Acute and Extended Anxiolytic Effects of Cannabidiol in Cannabis Flower: A Quasi-Experimental <i>ad libitum</i> Use Study.","authors":"L Cinnamon Bidwell, Renée Martin-Willett, Carillon Skrzynski, Jonathon Lisano, Marco Ortiz Torres, Gregory Giordano, Kent E Hutchison, Angela D Bryan","doi":"10.1089/can.2023.0187","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) and cannabidiol (CBD) have varying pharmacological actions with differential effects on acute and extended affective states, incuding anxiety. We aimed to study these effects on anxiety in legal market forms of cannabis. <b>Method:</b> This study makes use of a nonequivalent control group quasiexperimental design. Forty-two participants with anxiety symptions who were not using cannabis were compared to 258 participants with anxiety symptoms who used cannabis flower (∼3-4 times per week). Participants who used cannabis were randomly assigned to one of three legal market cannabis conditions; <i>THC-dominant</i> (24% THC, <1% CBD), <i>THC+CBD</i> (12% THC, 12% CBD), or <i>CBD-dominant</i> (<1% THC, 24% CBD). Changes in anxiety symptoms over 4-weeks were measured by the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) scale and the Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Scale (DASS). Acute changes in subjective mood immediately after cannabis use were measured by the Profile of Mood States (POMS) Elation, Tension, and Paranoia subscales and the Addiction Research Center Inventory intoxication scale. <b>Results:</b> While all participants reported anxiety reductions over the 4-week study on the PGIC (<i>F</i>=30.65, <i>p</i><0.001) and DASS anxiety measures (<i>F</i>=115.88, <i>p</i><0.001), <i>ad libitum</i> CBD-dominant cannabis use was associated with lower scores on the DASS anxiety subscale compared to THC-dominant use when accounting for frequency of use (difference=-1.03, SE=0.45, <i>p</i>=0.02). Similarly, acute CBD-dominant cannabis use was associated with lower scores on the POMS tension and paranoia subscales (POMS tension: CBD-dominant vs. THC-dominant: difference=-0.41 SE=0.1, <i>p</i><0.001; CBD-dominant vs. THC+CBD: difference=-0.28, SE=0.07, <i>p</i>=0.04; POMS paranoia: CBD-dominant vs. THC-dominant: difference=-0.49, SE=0.1, <i>p</i><0.001; CBD-dominant vs. THC+CBD: difference=-0.33, SE=0.09, <i>p</i>=0.01). Participants in all cannabis conditions experienced acute changes in positive mood and subjective drug effects. <b>Conclusions:</b> This study provides novel information on the impacts of legal market cannabis with varying ratios of THC to CBD in indviduals with anxiety symptoms. Findings suggest that THC did not increase anxiety and that CBD-dominant forms of cannabis were associated with acute tension reduction that may translate to longer-term reductions in anxiety symptoms. <b>Clinical Trial Registration:</b> NCT03491384.</p>","PeriodicalId":9386,"journal":{"name":"Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research","volume":" ","pages":"1015-1027"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11392455/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/can.2023.0187","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) and cannabidiol (CBD) have varying pharmacological actions with differential effects on acute and extended affective states, incuding anxiety. We aimed to study these effects on anxiety in legal market forms of cannabis. Method: This study makes use of a nonequivalent control group quasiexperimental design. Forty-two participants with anxiety symptions who were not using cannabis were compared to 258 participants with anxiety symptoms who used cannabis flower (∼3-4 times per week). Participants who used cannabis were randomly assigned to one of three legal market cannabis conditions; THC-dominant (24% THC, <1% CBD), THC+CBD (12% THC, 12% CBD), or CBD-dominant (<1% THC, 24% CBD). Changes in anxiety symptoms over 4-weeks were measured by the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) scale and the Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Scale (DASS). Acute changes in subjective mood immediately after cannabis use were measured by the Profile of Mood States (POMS) Elation, Tension, and Paranoia subscales and the Addiction Research Center Inventory intoxication scale. Results: While all participants reported anxiety reductions over the 4-week study on the PGIC (F=30.65, p<0.001) and DASS anxiety measures (F=115.88, p<0.001), ad libitum CBD-dominant cannabis use was associated with lower scores on the DASS anxiety subscale compared to THC-dominant use when accounting for frequency of use (difference=-1.03, SE=0.45, p=0.02). Similarly, acute CBD-dominant cannabis use was associated with lower scores on the POMS tension and paranoia subscales (POMS tension: CBD-dominant vs. THC-dominant: difference=-0.41 SE=0.1, p<0.001; CBD-dominant vs. THC+CBD: difference=-0.28, SE=0.07, p=0.04; POMS paranoia: CBD-dominant vs. THC-dominant: difference=-0.49, SE=0.1, p<0.001; CBD-dominant vs. THC+CBD: difference=-0.33, SE=0.09, p=0.01). Participants in all cannabis conditions experienced acute changes in positive mood and subjective drug effects. Conclusions: This study provides novel information on the impacts of legal market cannabis with varying ratios of THC to CBD in indviduals with anxiety symptoms. Findings suggest that THC did not increase anxiety and that CBD-dominant forms of cannabis were associated with acute tension reduction that may translate to longer-term reductions in anxiety symptoms. Clinical Trial Registration: NCT03491384.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
大麻花中大麻二酚的急性和延续性抗焦虑作用:自由使用的准实验研究》。
目的:Δ9-四氢大麻酚(THC)和大麻二酚(CBD)具有不同的药理作用,对急性和扩展性情感状态(包括焦虑)有不同的影响。我们旨在研究合法市场形式的大麻对焦虑的影响。方法:本研究采用非等效对照组准实验设计。42 名有焦虑症状但未吸食大麻的参与者与 258 名有焦虑症状但吸食大麻花(每周 3-4 次)的参与者进行了比较。使用大麻的参与者被随机分配到三种合法市场大麻条件之一:四氢大麻酚为主(24% 四氢大麻酚)、四氢大麻酚+CBD(12% 四氢大麻酚,12% CBD)或 CBD为主(结果:在为期 4 周的研究中,所有参与者的 PGIC 焦虑指数都有所下降(F=30.65,pF=115.88),但在考虑使用频率的情况下,CBD 主导型大麻的使用与 THC 主导型大麻的使用相比,DASS 焦虑分量表的得分更低(差异=-1.03,SE=0.45,p=0.02)。同样,急性 CBD 主导型大麻使用与 POMS 紧张和妄想症分量表得分较低有关(POMS 紧张:CBD 主导型 vs. THC 主导型:POMS 紧张:CBD 主导型 vs. THC 主导型:POMS 紧张:CBD 主导型 vs. THC 主导型):CBD主导与THC主导:差异=-0.41 SE=0.1,pp=0.04;POMS偏执:CBD主导与THC主导:差异=-0.41 SE=0.1,pp=0.04:CBD 主导与 THC 主导相比:差异=-0.49,SE=0.1,pp=0.01)。所有大麻条件下的参与者都经历了积极情绪和主观药效的急性变化。结论:这项研究提供了新的信息,说明了四氢大麻酚和二羟基大麻酚不同比例的合法市场大麻对焦虑症状患者的影响。研究结果表明,四氢大麻酚不会增加焦虑,而以 CBD 为主的大麻形式与急性紧张症的缓解有关,这可能会转化为焦虑症状的长期缓解。临床试验注册:NCT03491384。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research
Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
7.90%
发文量
164
期刊最新文献
How Veterans with Chronic Pain Approach Using Cannabis for Symptom Management: Results from a Qualitative Interpretive Description Study. Drug Interactions in People on Cannabidiol: Is There Cause for Concern? Federal Courts Will No Longer Need to Follow the DEA's Interpretation of Cannabis-Related Law. Minor Cannabinoid Profile of Unregulated Cannabidiol Products. Technology-Based Psychotherapeutic Interventions for Decreasing Cannabis Use in People with Psychosis: A Systematic Review Update.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1