首页 > 最新文献

Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research最新文献

英文 中文
Drug Interactions in People on Cannabidiol: Is There Cause for Concern? 服用大麻二酚者的药物相互作用:有必要担心吗?
IF 3.1 4区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Pub Date : 2024-11-14 DOI: 10.1089/can.2024.0041
Georgia Downs, Ristan Greer, Geraldine Moses, Taylan Gurgenci, Phillip Good, Janet Hardy

Introduction: Cannabidiol (CBD) exhibits multiple therapeutic properties, but its use in advanced cancer patients raises concerns about potential drug-drug interactions (DDIs) due to polypharmacy. This study aims to look for evidence of DDIs between concomitant medications and CBD oil in a randomized placebo-controlled trial of CBD oil for symptom control (MedCan-1 parent study). Materials and Methods: Surrogate measures were used to identify possible drug interactions: (1) the maximum mL of oil self-selected by patients in CBD or placebo groups in relation to opioids, specific drug groups, or individual agents; (2) the occurrence of any new or worse adverse effect in relation to the study arm and the concomitant medication classes/medications of interest. Results: The dose of CBD self-selected by participants was not related to opioid use or medications, including benzodiazepines and antipsychotics. The likelihood of developing an adverse effect while on study or when taking specific medications was not increased by CBD. Participants on paracetamol tolerated a higher dose of CBD. Discussion: Concerns regarding the development of clinically significant drug interactions when taking CBD in the context of anti-cancer and other concomitant medications at least in the short term may be unfounded.

简介:大麻二酚(CBD)具有多种治疗特性,但其在晚期癌症患者中的应用引发了人们对多种药物导致的潜在药物相互作用(DDIs)的担忧。本研究的目的是在CBD油用于症状控制的随机安慰剂对照试验(MedCan-1母研究)中寻找并用药物与CBD油之间的DDIs证据。材料与方法:采用代用指标来确定可能的药物相互作用:(1)CBD 或安慰剂组患者自行选择的与阿片类药物、特定药物组或单个药物相关的最大毫升油量;(2)与研究臂和相关的伴随药物类别/药物相关的任何新的或更严重的不良反应的发生。研究结果参与者自选的 CBD 剂量与阿片类药物的使用或药物(包括苯二氮卓类药物和抗精神病药物)无关。在研究期间或服用特定药物时出现不良反应的可能性并未因服用 CBD 而增加。服用扑热息痛的参与者能够耐受较高剂量的 CBD。讨论:至少在短期内,人们对服用 CBD 与抗癌药物和其他并用药物时会产生重大临床药物相互作用的担忧可能是没有根据的。
{"title":"Drug Interactions in People on Cannabidiol: Is There Cause for Concern?","authors":"Georgia Downs, Ristan Greer, Geraldine Moses, Taylan Gurgenci, Phillip Good, Janet Hardy","doi":"10.1089/can.2024.0041","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1089/can.2024.0041","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Introduction:</b> Cannabidiol (CBD) exhibits multiple therapeutic properties, but its use in advanced cancer patients raises concerns about potential drug-drug interactions (DDIs) due to polypharmacy. This study aims to look for evidence of DDIs between concomitant medications and CBD oil in a randomized placebo-controlled trial of CBD oil for symptom control (MedCan-1 parent study). <b>Materials and Methods:</b> Surrogate measures were used to identify possible drug interactions: (1) the maximum mL of oil self-selected by patients in CBD or placebo groups in relation to opioids, specific drug groups, or individual agents; (2) the occurrence of any new or worse adverse effect in relation to the study arm and the concomitant medication classes/medications of interest. <b>Results:</b> The dose of CBD self-selected by participants was not related to opioid use or medications, including benzodiazepines and antipsychotics. The likelihood of developing an adverse effect while on study or when taking specific medications was not increased by CBD. Participants on paracetamol tolerated a higher dose of CBD. <b>Discussion:</b> Concerns regarding the development of clinically significant drug interactions when taking CBD in the context of anti-cancer and other concomitant medications at least in the short term may be unfounded.</p>","PeriodicalId":9386,"journal":{"name":"Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2024-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142615309","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Federal Courts Will No Longer Need to Follow the DEA's Interpretation of Cannabis-Related Law. 联邦法院将不再需要遵循缉毒局对大麻相关法律的解释。
IF 3.1 4区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Pub Date : 2024-11-07 DOI: 10.1089/can.2024.0176
Bob Solomon
{"title":"Federal Courts Will No Longer Need to Follow the DEA's Interpretation of Cannabis-Related Law.","authors":"Bob Solomon","doi":"10.1089/can.2024.0176","DOIUrl":"10.1089/can.2024.0176","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":9386,"journal":{"name":"Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2024-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142589413","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Minor Cannabinoid Profile of Unregulated Cannabidiol Products. 未受管制的大麻二酚产品的次要大麻素简介。
IF 3.1 4区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Pub Date : 2024-10-30 DOI: 10.1089/can.2024.0058
Erin Johnson, Michael Kilgore, Paul Nuzzo, Shanna Babalonis

Background: Although the majority of cannabinoid research has focused on delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (Δ9-THC) and cannabidiol (CBD), there is increasing interest in the therapeutic effects of other phytocannabinoid compounds (i.e., minor cannabinoids), as there is little known about their effects or interaction with CBD. The current study objective was to determine the concentrations of 15 minor cannabinoids in unregulated, over-the-counter CBD products. Methods: A cross-section sample of 80 local and national brands of hemp-derived oil products was purchased both online and in local retail outlets in central Kentucky. Epidiolex® was included as a regulated control. Samples from each product were extracted by solvent extraction and quantified by liquid-chromatography tandem mass-spectrometry. The targeted cannabinoids were: cannabidiolic acid (CBDA), cannabidivarin (CBDV), cannabidivarinic acid, Δ9-tetrahydrocannabivarin, Δ9-tetrahydrocannabivarinic acid, Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinolic acid-A, Δ8-tetrahydrocannabinol (Δ8-THC), cannabigerol (CBG), cannabigerolic acid, cannabinol (CBN), cannabinolic acid, cannabicyclol (CBL), cannabicyclolic acid, cannabichromene (CBC) and cannabichromenic acid. Results: Among the unregulated products included in this analysis, the most frequently detected minor cannabinoids were CBDV (100% of samples tested), CBG (77%), CBC (72%), CBN (67%), CBL (67%), and CBDA (51%). Δ8-THC was not detected in any of the products tested. Concentrations of these cannabinoids varied widely from trace concentrations to several mg/mL (e.g., CBDA: 0.006-12.258 mg/mL). Conclusions: These data indicate CBD products often contain minor cannabinoids, although the array and concentrations of these cannabinoids vary widely across products. The concentrations of these minor cannabinoids are largely absent from product labels, leaving consumers uninformed about product contents.

背景:虽然大部分大麻素研究都集中在δ-9-四氢大麻酚(Δ9-THC)和大麻二酚(CBD)上,但人们对其他植物大麻素化合物(即次要大麻素)的治疗效果越来越感兴趣,因为人们对它们的效果或与 CBD 的相互作用知之甚少。本研究的目的是确定未受管制的非处方 CBD 产品中 15 种次要大麻素的浓度。研究方法:在肯塔基州中部的网上和当地零售店购买了 80 种本地和全国性大麻衍生油产品品牌的横截面样本。Epidiolex® 作为受管制的对照产品。每种产品的样本均通过溶剂萃取法提取,并通过液相色谱串联质谱法进行定量。目标大麻素包括大麻二醇酸 (CBDA)、大麻二萜 (CBDV)、大麻二萜酸、Δ9-四氢大麻二萜、Δ9-四氢大麻二萜酸、Δ9-四氢大麻酚酸-A、Δ8-四氢大麻酚(Δ8-THC)、大麻酚(CBG)、大麻酚酸、大麻酚(CBN)、大麻酚酸、大麻双环醇(CBL)、大麻双环醇酸、大麻色烯(CBC)和大麻色酸。结果:在本次分析所包括的非管制产品中,最常检测到的次要大麻素是 CBDV(100% 的检测样本)、CBG(77%)、CBC(72%)、CBN(67%)、CBL(67%)和 CBDA(51%)。在检测的任何产品中都没有检测到 Δ8-THC 。这些大麻素的浓度差异很大,从痕量浓度到几毫克/毫升不等(例如,CBDA:0.006-12.258 毫克/毫升)。结论:这些数据表明 CBD 产品通常含有次要大麻素,尽管这些大麻素的种类和浓度在不同产品中差别很大。这些次要大麻素的浓度在产品标签上基本没有标明,导致消费者对产品成分一无所知。
{"title":"Minor Cannabinoid Profile of Unregulated Cannabidiol Products.","authors":"Erin Johnson, Michael Kilgore, Paul Nuzzo, Shanna Babalonis","doi":"10.1089/can.2024.0058","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1089/can.2024.0058","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Although the majority of cannabinoid research has focused on delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (Δ<sup>9</sup>-THC) and cannabidiol (CBD), there is increasing interest in the therapeutic effects of other phytocannabinoid compounds (i.e., minor cannabinoids), as there is little known about their effects or interaction with CBD. The current study objective was to determine the concentrations of 15 minor cannabinoids in unregulated, over-the-counter CBD products. <b>Methods:</b> A cross-section sample of 80 local and national brands of hemp-derived oil products was purchased both online and in local retail outlets in central Kentucky. Epidiolex® was included as a regulated control. Samples from each product were extracted by solvent extraction and quantified by liquid-chromatography tandem mass-spectrometry. The targeted cannabinoids were: cannabidiolic acid (CBDA), cannabidivarin (CBDV), cannabidivarinic acid, Δ<sup>9</sup>-tetrahydrocannabivarin, Δ<sup>9</sup>-tetrahydrocannabivarinic acid, Δ<sup>9</sup>-tetrahydrocannabinolic acid-A, Δ<sup>8</sup>-tetrahydrocannabinol (Δ<sup>8</sup>-THC), cannabigerol (CBG), cannabigerolic acid, cannabinol (CBN), cannabinolic acid, cannabicyclol (CBL), cannabicyclolic acid, cannabichromene (CBC) and cannabichromenic acid. <b>Results:</b> Among the unregulated products included in this analysis, the most frequently detected minor cannabinoids were CBDV (100% of samples tested), CBG (77%), CBC (72%), CBN (67%), CBL (67%), and CBDA (51%). Δ<sup>8</sup>-THC was not detected in any of the products tested. Concentrations of these cannabinoids varied widely from trace concentrations to several mg/mL (e.g., CBDA: 0.006-12.258 mg/mL). <b>Conclusions:</b> These data indicate CBD products often contain minor cannabinoids, although the array and concentrations of these cannabinoids vary widely across products. The concentrations of these minor cannabinoids are largely absent from product labels, leaving consumers uninformed about product contents.</p>","PeriodicalId":9386,"journal":{"name":"Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2024-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142543868","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Technology-Based Psychotherapeutic Interventions for Decreasing Cannabis Use in People with Psychosis: A Systematic Review Update. 基于技术的心理治疗干预,减少精神病患者的大麻使用:系统性综述更新。
IF 3.1 4区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Pub Date : 2024-10-24 DOI: 10.1089/can.2024.0094
Ovidiu Tatar, Hamzah Bakouni, Amal Abdel-Baki, Didier Jutras-Aswad

Cannabis use is highly prevalent in people with psychotic disorders and is associated with adverse outcomes. We updated our 2020 systematic review related to the efficacy of technology-based psychological interventions (TBPIs) to decrease cannabis use in individuals with psychosis, the design of TBPIs, and their acceptability. We searched Medline, PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and EMB Reviews for references indexed between November 27, 2019, and July 27, 2023, and used the PRISMA guidelines to report the results. We screened 5083 unique records and retained three studies for the narrative synthesis. Two quantitative studies showed promising results of internet or virtual reality-based psychological interventions that incorporate cognitive behavioral therapy, motivational interviewing, and psychoeducation principles on the frequency and quantity of cannabis use. A qualitative exploratory study provided an integrative synthesis of patient and clinician opinions pertaining to the use of psychological approaches and technology to tackle cannabis misuse in individuals with psychosis. In contradiction with the rapidly expanding mobile-health solutions in the field of mental health, there is a dearth of research related to the use of internet and app-based psychological interventions for cannabis use in individuals with psychosis. The use of qualitative research is pivotal in the development of TBPIs. Our initial review and its update show that only 11 peer-reviewed journal articles that met our inclusion criteria have been published so far.

吸食大麻在精神病患者中非常普遍,并且与不良后果相关。我们更新了 2020 年的系统综述,内容涉及基于技术的心理干预(TBPI)对减少精神病患者吸食大麻的疗效、TBPI 的设计及其可接受性。我们检索了Medline、PubMed、Embase、CINAHL、PsycINFO和EMB Reviews在2019年11月27日至2023年7月27日期间索引的参考文献,并使用PRISMA指南报告结果。我们筛选了 5083 条唯一记录,并保留了三项研究用于叙述性综述。两项定量研究表明,基于互联网或虚拟现实的心理干预措施,结合了认知行为疗法、动机访谈和心理教育原则,对大麻使用的频率和数量有很好的效果。一项定性探索性研究综合了患者和临床医生对使用心理方法和技术解决精神病患者滥用大麻问题的看法。与精神健康领域快速发展的移动医疗解决方案相矛盾的是,有关使用互联网和应用程序对精神病患者使用大麻进行心理干预的研究却十分匮乏。在开发 TBPIs 的过程中,定性研究的使用至关重要。我们的初步审查及其更新显示,迄今为止仅发表了 11 篇符合我们纳入标准的同行评审期刊文章。
{"title":"Technology-Based Psychotherapeutic Interventions for Decreasing Cannabis Use in People with Psychosis: A Systematic Review Update.","authors":"Ovidiu Tatar, Hamzah Bakouni, Amal Abdel-Baki, Didier Jutras-Aswad","doi":"10.1089/can.2024.0094","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1089/can.2024.0094","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Cannabis use is highly prevalent in people with psychotic disorders and is associated with adverse outcomes. We updated our 2020 systematic review related to the efficacy of technology-based psychological interventions (TBPIs) to decrease cannabis use in individuals with psychosis, the design of TBPIs, and their acceptability. We searched Medline, PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and EMB Reviews for references indexed between November 27, 2019, and July 27, 2023, and used the PRISMA guidelines to report the results. We screened 5083 unique records and retained three studies for the narrative synthesis. Two quantitative studies showed promising results of internet or virtual reality-based psychological interventions that incorporate cognitive behavioral therapy, motivational interviewing, and psychoeducation principles on the frequency and quantity of cannabis use. A qualitative exploratory study provided an integrative synthesis of patient and clinician opinions pertaining to the use of psychological approaches and technology to tackle cannabis misuse in individuals with psychosis. In contradiction with the rapidly expanding mobile-health solutions in the field of mental health, there is a dearth of research related to the use of internet and app-based psychological interventions for cannabis use in individuals with psychosis. The use of qualitative research is pivotal in the development of TBPIs. Our initial review and its update show that only 11 peer-reviewed journal articles that met our inclusion criteria have been published so far.</p>","PeriodicalId":9386,"journal":{"name":"Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2024-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142495626","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Biological Response after 14-Day Cannabidiol and Propylene Glycol Inhalation in Sprague-Dawley Rats. Sprague-Dawley 大鼠吸入 14 天大麻二酚和丙二醇后的生物反应。
IF 3.1 4区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Pub Date : 2024-10-23 DOI: 10.1089/can.2023.0132
Daniela Schwotzer, Justyna Kulpa, Andrew Gigliotti, Wendy Dye, Kristen Trexler, Hammad Irshad, Tim Lefever, Mark Ware, Marcel Bonn-Miller, Jacob McDonald

Objective: Cannabidiol (CBD), a phytocannabinoid of increasing interest for its purported therapeutic effects, is primarily consumed via ingestion and inhalation. While the toxicology of orally administered CBD has been reported, little is known about the effects of CBD inhalation. Doses selected for the present analysis allowed for evaluation of dose-response at concentrations >100-fold higher than typical human consumption levels. Materials and Methods: CBD (98.89% pure) was formulated in propylene glycol (PG) and aerosolized by nebulization to evaluate biological response after nose-only inhalation. Sprague Dawley rats (n = 35 males, 30 females) were exposed to 1.0 and 1.3 mg/L nominal concentrations of CBD and PG, respectively, for 12-180 min. Resulting average daily presented dose ranges were 8.9-138.5 mg/kg CBD and 11.3-176.0 mg/kg PG. Aerosols of 1.4 µm median diameter were achieved. Biological response indicators included clinical signs, clinical chemistry, hematology, body/organ weights, and pulmonary/systemic histopathology. Results: Inflammatory and necrotic responses were observed in the nose at the highest doses of CBD. Limited findings in the larynx and lung were mainly observed at higher doses. There were no histological findings in extrapulmonary organs. Dosimetry modeling differentiated the no observable adverse effect level between the nasal region and lungs to be 2.8 and 10.6 mg/kg CBD, respectively. Conclusions: Dose-depending findings of histological changes in the respiratory tract are observed at high doses. At lower doses consistent with typical over-the-counter vape products there appears to be substantial safety margin in the present study (93- and 353-fold lower for nose and lung, respectively).

目的:大麻二酚(CBD)是一种植物大麻素,因其所谓的治疗效果而受到越来越多的关注。虽然口服 CBD 的毒理学已有报道,但对吸入 CBD 的影响却知之甚少。本分析所选择的剂量允许在浓度比典型的人类消费水平高 100 倍以上的情况下评估剂量反应。材料和方法将纯度为 98.89% 的 CBD 配制在丙二醇(PG)中,并通过雾化吸入来评估纯鼻吸入后的生物反应。斯普拉格道利大鼠(雄性 35 只,雌性 30 只)分别接触 1.0 和 1.3 mg/L 标称浓度的 CBD 和 PG 12-180 分钟。结果得出的日平均剂量范围为 8.9-138.5 毫克/千克 CBD 和 11.3-176.0 毫克/千克 PG。气溶胶的中值直径为 1.4 微米。生物反应指标包括临床症状、临床化学、血液学、体重/器官重量以及肺/系统组织病理学。结果:在CBD的最高剂量下,鼻腔出现了炎症和坏死反应。喉部和肺部的有限发现主要出现在较高剂量时。肺外器官没有组织学发现。剂量测定模型显示,鼻腔和肺部的无明显不良反应水平分别为 2.8 毫克/千克 CBD 和 10.6 毫克/千克 CBD。结论高剂量时可观察到呼吸道组织学变化的剂量依赖性结果。在本研究中,与典型的非处方 Vape 产品一致的较低剂量似乎有很大的安全余量(鼻腔和肺部分别低 93 倍和 353 倍)。
{"title":"Biological Response after 14-Day Cannabidiol and Propylene Glycol Inhalation in Sprague-Dawley Rats.","authors":"Daniela Schwotzer, Justyna Kulpa, Andrew Gigliotti, Wendy Dye, Kristen Trexler, Hammad Irshad, Tim Lefever, Mark Ware, Marcel Bonn-Miller, Jacob McDonald","doi":"10.1089/can.2023.0132","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1089/can.2023.0132","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> Cannabidiol (CBD), a phytocannabinoid of increasing interest for its purported therapeutic effects, is primarily consumed <i>via</i> ingestion and inhalation. While the toxicology of orally administered CBD has been reported, little is known about the effects of CBD inhalation. Doses selected for the present analysis allowed for evaluation of dose-response at concentrations >100-fold higher than typical human consumption levels. <b>Materials and Methods:</b> CBD (98.89% pure) was formulated in propylene glycol (PG) and aerosolized by nebulization to evaluate biological response after nose-only inhalation. Sprague Dawley rats (<i>n</i> = 35 males, 30 females) were exposed to 1.0 and 1.3 mg/L nominal concentrations of CBD and PG, respectively, for 12-180 min. Resulting average daily presented dose ranges were 8.9-138.5 mg/kg CBD and 11.3-176.0 mg/kg PG. Aerosols of 1.4 µm median diameter were achieved. Biological response indicators included clinical signs, clinical chemistry, hematology, body/organ weights, and pulmonary/systemic histopathology. <b>Results:</b> Inflammatory and necrotic responses were observed in the nose at the highest doses of CBD. Limited findings in the larynx and lung were mainly observed at higher doses. There were no histological findings in extrapulmonary organs. Dosimetry modeling differentiated the no observable adverse effect level between the nasal region and lungs to be 2.8 and 10.6 mg/kg CBD, respectively. <b>Conclusions:</b> Dose-depending findings of histological changes in the respiratory tract are observed at high doses. At lower doses consistent with typical over-the-counter vape products there appears to be substantial safety margin in the present study (93- and 353-fold lower for nose and lung, respectively).</p>","PeriodicalId":9386,"journal":{"name":"Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2024-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142495625","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Association Between Medical Marijuana Cardholder Status and Antiemetic Overuse. 医用大麻持卡人身份与止吐药过度使用之间的关系。
IF 3.1 4区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Pub Date : 2024-10-17 DOI: 10.1089/can.2024.0083
Alan P Baltz, Cheng Peng, Laura Gressler, Sajjad Bhatti, Kanna Lewis

Introduction: The conscientious prescribing of antiemetics by chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) risk was highlighted in the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) "Choosing Wisely" recommendations. The pharmacologic properties of medical marijuana (MMJ) may allow for decreased incidence of CINV; however, little is known about the effects of MMJ on the use of antiemetics. This study aimed to determine if MMJ cardholder status, which enables access to MMJ, is associated with antiemetic overuse among patients with cancer. Materials and Methods: This population-based secondary data analysis examined a retrospective cohort derived from the linked Arkansas All Payers Claims Database (2013-2020) and MMJ cardholder registry (2013-2019). The cohort consisted of 20,558 patients with cancer aged 18 and older with a chemotherapy claim in an outpatient setting within 12 months of a cancer diagnosis. Exposure was a registration to receive an MMJ card that permitted access to MMJ. The primary outcome of interest was antiemetic overuse, as characterized by the ASCO recommendation. Antiemetic use associated with chemotherapy was identified through filled prescriptions and medical claims. Multivariable logistic regression, adjusted for baseline demographic and prescription characteristics, was used to calculate the adjusted odds ratios (aOR) of antiemetic overuse among MMJ cardholders compared with non-MMJ cardholders. Results: Among 20,558 eligible patients, 436 (2.1%) had an MMJ card at some point in the study period. Antiemetic overuse was identified in 7.5% of chemotherapy cycles. Compared with non-MMJ cardholders, MMJ cardholders were less likely to experience antiemetics overuse (aOR: 0.76, p < 0.001). Patients with fewer chemotherapy cycles and younger in age had higher odds of antiemetic overuse compared with those with more chemotherapy cycles. The risk of antiemetic overuse did not differ based on gender and rurality of residency. Route of chemotherapy administration, CINV risk category, and type of cancer also impacted the odds of antiemetic overuse. Discussion: The findings indicate that MMJ cardholders are significantly less likely to experience antiemetic overuse than non-MMJ cardholders. Further investigation into the use, effectiveness, and safety of cannabis for CINV mitigation is needed to inform patient and provider decision-making.

导言:美国临床肿瘤学会(ASCO)的 "明智选择"(Choosing Wisely)建议强调,化疗引起的恶心和呕吐(CINV)风险患者应谨慎使用止吐药。医用大麻(MMJ)的药理特性可能会降低 CINV 的发生率;然而,人们对医用大麻对使用止吐药的影响知之甚少。本研究旨在确定能够获得医用大麻的持卡人身份是否与癌症患者过度使用止吐药有关。材料与方法:这项基于人群的二次数据分析研究了一个回顾性队列,该队列来自于阿肯色州所有支付者索赔数据库(2013-2020 年)和 MMJ 持卡人登记表(2013-2019 年)。该队列由 20,558 名 18 岁及以上癌症患者组成,他们在确诊癌症后 12 个月内曾在门诊接受过化疗。暴露是指登记领取允许使用 MMJ 的 MMJ 卡。根据 ASCO 建议,主要研究结果是过度使用止吐药。通过已开具的处方和医疗报销单确定了与化疗相关的止吐药使用情况。在对基线人口统计学特征和处方特征进行调整后,采用多变量逻辑回归法计算出持有 MMJ 卡的患者与未持有 MMJ 卡的患者相比,过度使用止吐药的调整几率比 (aOR)。结果显示在 20558 名符合条件的患者中,有 436 人(2.1%)在研究期间的某个时间持有 MMJ 卡。在 7.5% 的化疗周期中发现了过度使用止吐药的情况。与未持有 MMJ 卡的患者相比,持有 MMJ 卡的患者不太可能过度使用止吐药(aOR:0.76,p < 0.001)。与化疗周期较多的患者相比,化疗周期较少、年龄较轻的患者出现止吐药过度使用的几率更高。止吐药过度使用的风险因性别和居住地的不同而无差异。化疗给药途径、CINV 风险类别和癌症类型也会影响过度使用止吐药的几率。讨论:研究结果表明,MMJ持卡人过度使用止吐药的几率明显低于非MMJ持卡人。需要进一步调查大麻用于缓解 CINV 的使用情况、有效性和安全性,以便为患者和医疗服务提供者的决策提供信息。
{"title":"Association Between Medical Marijuana Cardholder Status and Antiemetic Overuse.","authors":"Alan P Baltz, Cheng Peng, Laura Gressler, Sajjad Bhatti, Kanna Lewis","doi":"10.1089/can.2024.0083","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1089/can.2024.0083","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Introduction:</b> The conscientious prescribing of antiemetics by chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) risk was highlighted in the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) \"Choosing Wisely\" recommendations. The pharmacologic properties of medical marijuana (MMJ) may allow for decreased incidence of CINV; however, little is known about the effects of MMJ on the use of antiemetics. This study aimed to determine if MMJ cardholder status, which enables access to MMJ, is associated with antiemetic overuse among patients with cancer. <b>Materials and Methods:</b> This population-based secondary data analysis examined a retrospective cohort derived from the linked Arkansas All Payers Claims Database (2013-2020) and MMJ cardholder registry (2013-2019). The cohort consisted of 20,558 patients with cancer aged 18 and older with a chemotherapy claim in an outpatient setting within 12 months of a cancer diagnosis. Exposure was a registration to receive an MMJ card that permitted access to MMJ. The primary outcome of interest was antiemetic overuse, as characterized by the ASCO recommendation. Antiemetic use associated with chemotherapy was identified through filled prescriptions and medical claims. Multivariable logistic regression, adjusted for baseline demographic and prescription characteristics, was used to calculate the adjusted odds ratios (aOR) of antiemetic overuse among MMJ cardholders compared with non-MMJ cardholders. <b>Results:</b> Among 20,558 eligible patients, 436 (2.1%) had an MMJ card at some point in the study period. Antiemetic overuse was identified in 7.5% of chemotherapy cycles. Compared with non-MMJ cardholders, MMJ cardholders were less likely to experience antiemetics overuse (aOR: 0.76, <i>p</i> < 0.001). Patients with fewer chemotherapy cycles and younger in age had higher odds of antiemetic overuse compared with those with more chemotherapy cycles. The risk of antiemetic overuse did not differ based on gender and rurality of residency. Route of chemotherapy administration, CINV risk category, and type of cancer also impacted the odds of antiemetic overuse. <b>Discussion:</b> The findings indicate that MMJ cardholders are significantly less likely to experience antiemetic overuse than non-MMJ cardholders. Further investigation into the use, effectiveness, and safety of cannabis for CINV mitigation is needed to inform patient and provider decision-making.</p>","PeriodicalId":9386,"journal":{"name":"Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2024-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142458562","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Lack of Cannabinoid Type 2 Promoter Activity in Normal or Injured Kidneys Using a Cnr2-GFP Reporter Mouse. 利用 Cnr2-GFP 报告基因小鼠发现正常或损伤肾脏中缺乏大麻素 2 型启动子活性。
IF 3.1 4区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Pub Date : 2024-10-09 DOI: 10.1089/can.2024.0142
Avery G Boals, Daniel M Collier, Julian R Romero, Cecilia J Hillard, Frank Park

Introduction: Although cannabinoid type 2 (CB2) receptor activity is known to promote diverse biological functions in the kidney, published data regarding CB2 receptor protein levels and cellular distribution within the kidney is inconsistent. The goal of the present study was to investigate the changes of CB2 in the kidney obtained from mice exposed to various forms of kidney injury using a genetic mouse model expressing green fluorescent protein (GFP) driven by the endogenous cannabinoid receptor 2 (Cnr2) promoter. Materials and Methods: Kidney injury was established in a genetic mouse model expressing green fluorescent protein (GFP) driven by the endogenous Cnr2 promoter. Kidney injury was initiated by either treatment with different chemicals [cisplatin or lipopolysaccharide (LPS)] or by unilateral ureteral obstruction (UUO). Changes in the detection of GFP were used as a proxy for CB2 levels and localization. Histological changes due to the injury stimuli were observed by time-related, morphological changes in kidney cytoarchitecture and blood parameters, such as serum creatinine levels. Cnr2 mRNA levels were detected by reverse transcription coupled to polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) while protein changes in the tissue lysates were measured by Western blot analysis. Cellular localization of GFP was detected by fluorescent microscopy. Results: Our data demonstrated that there was no band or a minimally detectable band for GFP using kidney lysates from vehicle- or cisplatin-treated mice. A similar lack of GFP was detected in the UUO kidney versus the contralateral control kidney. This is consistent with the low, albeit detectable levels of Cnr2 mRNA in the kidney samples from control or cisplatin treatment. In frozen kidney sections from vehicle and cisplatin-treated mice, GFP fluorescence was not detectable in tubular epithelia, glomeruli or blood vessels in the cortex. Instead, GFP was detected in rare cells within the interstitial space. A second chemical injury model using LPS found a similar lack of GFP protein levels and an absence of legitimate GFP fluorescence in the main cell types within the kidney. Conclusion: These findings suggest that Cnr2 promoter activity is minimally active in normal or injured kidneys, and that pharmacological manipulation of CB2 receptors may be associated with receptors being expressed in cells recruited to the kidney.

简介:虽然已知大麻素 2 型(CB2)受体的活性可促进肾脏的多种生物功能,但已发表的有关 CB2 受体蛋白水平和肾脏内细胞分布的数据并不一致。本研究的目的是利用由内源性大麻素受体 2(Cnr2)启动子驱动的表达绿色荧光蛋白(GFP)的遗传小鼠模型,研究暴露于各种形式肾损伤的小鼠肾脏中 CB2 的变化。材料和方法:在内源性 Cnr2 启动子驱动的表达绿色荧光蛋白(GFP)的遗传小鼠模型中建立肾损伤。肾损伤由不同的化学物质[顺铂或脂多糖(LPS)]或单侧输尿管梗阻(UUO)引起。GFP 的检测变化被用作 CB2 水平和定位的替代物。通过肾脏细胞结构和血液参数(如血清肌酐水平)与时间相关的形态学变化,观察损伤刺激引起的组织学变化。Cnr2 mRNA水平通过反转录聚合酶链反应(RT-PCR)检测,组织裂解液中蛋白质的变化则通过Western印迹分析测定。荧光显微镜检测了 GFP 的细胞定位。结果我们的数据表明,在使用药物或顺铂处理的小鼠肾脏裂解液中,GFP 没有条带或仅有极少量可检测到的条带。在 UUO 肾脏与对侧对照肾脏中也检测到了类似的 GFP 缺失。这与对照组或顺铂处理的肾脏样本中 Cnr2 mRNA 含量低(尽管可检测到)的情况一致。在载体和顺铂处理小鼠的冷冻肾切片中,在肾小管上皮、肾小球或皮质血管中均检测不到 GFP 荧光。相反,在间质内的稀有细胞中检测到了 GFP。在第二个使用 LPS 的化学损伤模型中,也发现了类似的 GFP 蛋白水平缺乏现象,肾脏内的主要细胞类型也没有合法的 GFP 荧光。结论这些研究结果表明,Cnr2 启动子的活性在正常或损伤的肾脏中微乎其微,而对 CB2 受体的药理操作可能与受体在肾脏被招募的细胞中表达有关。
{"title":"Lack of Cannabinoid Type 2 Promoter Activity in Normal or Injured Kidneys Using a Cnr2-GFP Reporter Mouse.","authors":"Avery G Boals, Daniel M Collier, Julian R Romero, Cecilia J Hillard, Frank Park","doi":"10.1089/can.2024.0142","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1089/can.2024.0142","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Introduction:</b> Although cannabinoid type 2 (CB2) receptor activity is known to promote diverse biological functions in the kidney, published data regarding CB2 receptor protein levels and cellular distribution within the kidney is inconsistent. The goal of the present study was to investigate the changes of CB2 in the kidney obtained from mice exposed to various forms of kidney injury using a genetic mouse model expressing green fluorescent protein (GFP) driven by the endogenous cannabinoid receptor 2 (Cnr2) promoter. <b>Materials and Methods:</b> Kidney injury was established in a genetic mouse model expressing green fluorescent protein (GFP) driven by the endogenous Cnr2 promoter. Kidney injury was initiated by either treatment with different chemicals [cisplatin or lipopolysaccharide (LPS)] or by unilateral ureteral obstruction (UUO). Changes in the detection of GFP were used as a proxy for CB2 levels and localization. Histological changes due to the injury stimuli were observed by time-related, morphological changes in kidney cytoarchitecture and blood parameters, such as serum creatinine levels. Cnr2 mRNA levels were detected by reverse transcription coupled to polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) while protein changes in the tissue lysates were measured by Western blot analysis. Cellular localization of GFP was detected by fluorescent microscopy. <b>Results:</b> Our data demonstrated that there was no band or a minimally detectable band for GFP using kidney lysates from vehicle- or cisplatin-treated mice. A similar lack of GFP was detected in the UUO kidney versus the contralateral control kidney. This is consistent with the low, albeit detectable levels of Cnr2 mRNA in the kidney samples from control or cisplatin treatment. In frozen kidney sections from vehicle and cisplatin-treated mice, GFP fluorescence was not detectable in tubular epithelia, glomeruli or blood vessels in the cortex. Instead, GFP was detected in rare cells within the interstitial space. A second chemical injury model using LPS found a similar lack of GFP protein levels and an absence of legitimate GFP fluorescence in the main cell types within the kidney. <b>Conclusion:</b> These findings suggest that Cnr2 promoter activity is minimally active in normal or injured kidneys, and that pharmacological manipulation of CB2 receptors may be associated with receptors being expressed in cells recruited to the kidney.</p>","PeriodicalId":9386,"journal":{"name":"Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2024-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142388262","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Legalization of Smokable Medical Cannabis and Changes in the Dispensed Amount of Δ-9 Tetrahydrocannabinol Per Patient. 可吸食医用大麻的合法化与每位患者获得的 Δ-9 四氢大麻酚配药量的变化。
IF 3.1 4区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Pub Date : 2024-10-07 DOI: 10.1089/can.2024.0073
Sebastian Jugl, Ruba Sajdeya, Melanie Buhlmann, Robert L Cook, Joshua D Brown, Almut G Winterstein, Amie J Goodin

Introduction: Florida's medical cannabis (marijuana) program is among the largest in the United States. Smokable cannabis forms were not legally available in this program until 2019, and five years after other forms of cannabis were available. This study assessed changes in Δ-9 tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) dispensed per patient following legalization of smokable cannabis in Florida. Materials and Methods: This quasi-experimental study used data from the Florida Department of Health Office of Medical Marijuana Use Reports on THC dispensing from April 6, 2018, through March 13, 2020. Certified medical cannabis user during the study period was included. The exposure was the dispensed amount of THC from legalized smokable forms of medical cannabis (statute identified as SB182), effective as of March 2019. Changes in level and trend of average milligram (mg) of dispensed THC per certified patient with 95% confidence intervals (CIs), before and after SB182, were calculated by fitting a generalized least squares linear model and allowing a 17-week phase-in period. Results: The number of certified patients increased by 24.8% from 197,107 (March 22, 2019) to 246,079 (July 19, 2019) and to 325,868 by March 13, 2020. Assuming that a 20% THC concentration in smokable products, there was a significant level increase in the mean weekly dispensed THC amount per certified patient of 138.45 mg (95% CI: 102.69-174.20), translating to a 42.18% increase (95% CI: 33.14-50.28), from the pre-policy period. We noted a continuous increase of 5.62 mg per certified patient per week (95% CI: 4.35-6.89) throughout the 35 weeks following the policy, when compared with the period before. Assuming 10% THC concentration in smokable products, we observed a significant level increase of 35.10 mg (95% CI: 5.31-64.88), corresponding to an increase of 10.70% (95% CI: 1.70-18.89), and a trend increase of 2.23 mg per certified patient per week (95% CI: 1.18-3.29). Discussion: The expansion of the Florida medical cannabis program to include smokable cannabis forms was associated with a significant increase in the mean amount of weekly dispensed THC per certified patient. Findings suggest that the dispensed amount of THC after legalization of smokable medical cannabis far exceeds the maximum recommended daily dose, based on extrapolation from oral cannabis product dosing recommendations from one expert consensus statement, raising questions about the safety, and need for consumer education.

导言:佛罗里达州的医用大麻(大麻)计划是美国最大的大麻计划之一。可吸食大麻直到 2019 年才在该计划中合法供应,比其他形式的大麻供应晚了五年。本研究评估了佛罗里达州可吸食大麻合法化后每位患者所配发的 Δ-9 四氢大麻酚 (THC) 的变化情况。材料和方法:这项准实验研究使用的数据来自佛罗里达州卫生部医用大麻使用办公室关于 2018 年 4 月 6 日至 2020 年 3 月 13 日期间四氢大麻酚配药情况的报告。研究对象包括在研究期间获得认证的医用大麻使用者。暴露量是自 2019 年 3 月起生效的合法化可吸食医用大麻(法规名称为 SB182)的四氢大麻酚配给量。通过拟合广义最小二乘法线性模型并允许 17 周的逐步适应期,计算出 SB182 之前和之后每位认证患者平均配发四氢大麻酚毫克 (mg) 的水平和趋势变化以及 95% 的置信区间 (CI)。结果显示获得认证的患者人数增加了 24.8%,从 197107 人(2019 年 3 月 22 日)增加到 246079 人(2019 年 7 月 19 日),到 2020 年 3 月 13 日增加到 325868 人。假设可吸食产品中的四氢大麻酚浓度为 20%,那么每位认证患者每周平均配发的四氢大麻酚数量将显著增加 138.45 毫克(95% CI:102.69-174.20),与政策实施前相比增加 42.18%(95% CI:33.14-50.28)。我们注意到,与政策实施前相比,在政策实施后的 35 周内,每名认证患者每周吸食量持续增加了 5.62 毫克(95% CI:4.35-6.89)。假定可吸入产品中的四氢大麻酚浓度为 10%,我们观察到显著水平增加了 35.10 毫克(95% CI:5.31-64.88),相当于增加了 10.70%(95% CI:1.70-18.89),每名认证患者每周增加 2.23 毫克(95% CI:1.18-3.29)。讨论:佛罗里达州医用大麻计划扩大到包括可吸食大麻形式,这与每位认证患者每周四氢大麻酚平均配给量的显著增加有关。研究结果表明,根据一份专家共识声明中对口服大麻产品剂量建议的推断,可吸入医用大麻合法化后的四氢大麻酚配给量远远超过了每日最大推荐剂量,从而引发了安全性问题以及消费者教育的必要性。
{"title":"Legalization of Smokable Medical Cannabis and Changes in the Dispensed Amount of Δ-9 Tetrahydrocannabinol Per Patient.","authors":"Sebastian Jugl, Ruba Sajdeya, Melanie Buhlmann, Robert L Cook, Joshua D Brown, Almut G Winterstein, Amie J Goodin","doi":"10.1089/can.2024.0073","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1089/can.2024.0073","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Introduction:</b> Florida's medical cannabis (marijuana) program is among the largest in the United States. Smokable cannabis forms were not legally available in this program until 2019, and five years after other forms of cannabis were available. This study assessed changes in Δ-9 tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) dispensed per patient following legalization of smokable cannabis in Florida. <b>Materials and Methods:</b> This quasi-experimental study used data from the Florida Department of Health Office of Medical Marijuana Use Reports on THC dispensing from April 6, 2018, through March 13, 2020. Certified medical cannabis user during the study period was included. The exposure was the dispensed amount of THC from legalized smokable forms of medical cannabis (statute identified as SB182), effective as of March 2019. Changes in level and trend of average milligram (mg) of dispensed THC per certified patient with 95% confidence intervals (CIs), before and after SB182, were calculated by fitting a generalized least squares linear model and allowing a 17-week phase-in period. <b>Results:</b> The number of certified patients increased by 24.8% from 197,107 (March 22, 2019) to 246,079 (July 19, 2019) and to 325,868 by March 13, 2020. Assuming that a 20% THC concentration in smokable products, there was a significant level increase in the mean weekly dispensed THC amount per certified patient of 138.45 mg (95% CI: 102.69-174.20), translating to a 42.18% increase (95% CI: 33.14-50.28), from the pre-policy period. We noted a continuous increase of 5.62 mg per certified patient per week (95% CI: 4.35-6.89) throughout the 35 weeks following the policy, when compared with the period before. Assuming 10% THC concentration in smokable products, we observed a significant level increase of 35.10 mg (95% CI: 5.31-64.88), corresponding to an increase of 10.70% (95% CI: 1.70-18.89), and a trend increase of 2.23 mg per certified patient per week (95% CI: 1.18-3.29). <b>Discussion:</b> The expansion of the Florida medical cannabis program to include smokable cannabis forms was associated with a significant increase in the mean amount of weekly dispensed THC per certified patient. Findings suggest that the dispensed amount of THC after legalization of smokable medical cannabis far exceeds the maximum recommended daily dose, based on extrapolation from oral cannabis product dosing recommendations from one expert consensus statement, raising questions about the safety, and need for consumer education.</p>","PeriodicalId":9386,"journal":{"name":"Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2024-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142388263","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
No Evidence for Endocannabinoid-Induced G Protein Subtype Selectivity at Human and Rodent Cannabinoid CB1 Receptors. 没有证据表明人类和啮齿类动物的大麻素 CB1 受体具有内源性大麻素诱导的 G 蛋白亚型选择性。
IF 3.1 4区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Pub Date : 2024-10-07 DOI: 10.1089/can.2024.0133
Xiaoxi Zheng, Beth Ehrlich, David Finlay, Michelle Glass

Introduction: The endocannabinoid system (ECS) is a widespread neurotransmitter system. A key characteristic of the ECS is that there are multiple endogenous ligands (endocannabinoids). Of these, the most extensively studied are arachidonoyl ethanolamide (AEA) and 2-arachidonoyl-glycerol (2-AG), both act as agonists at the cannabinoid CB1 receptor. In humans, three CB1 variants have been identified: hCB1, considered the most abundant G protein-coupled receptor in the brain, alongside the less abundant and studied variants, hCB1a and hCB1b. CB1 exhibits a preference for coupling with inhibitory Gi/o proteins, although its interactions with specific members of the Gi/o family remain poorly characterized. This study aimed to compare the AEA and 2-AG-induced activation of various G protein subtypes at CB1. Furthermore, we compared the response of human CB1 (hCB1, hCB1a, hCB1b) and explored species differences by examining rodent receptors (mCB1, rCB1). Materials and Methods: Activation of individual G protein subtypes in HEK293 cells transiently expressing CB1 was measured with G protein dissociation assay utilizing TRUPATH biosensors. The performance of the TRUPATH biosensors was evaluated using Z-factor analysis. Pathway potencies and efficacies were analyzed using the operational analysis of bias to determine G protein subtype selectivity for AEA and 2-AG. Results: Initial screening of TRUPATH biosensors performance revealed variable sensitivities within our system. Based on the biosensor performance, the G protein subtypes pursued for further characterization were Gi1, Gi3, GoA, GoB, GZ, G12, and G13. Across all pathways, AEA demonstrated partial agonism, whereas 2-AG exhibited full or high-efficacy agonism. Notably, we provide direct evidence that the hCB1 receptor couples to G12 and G13 proteins. Our findings do not indicate any evidence of G protein subtype selectivity. Similar observations were made across the human receptor variants (hCB1, hCB1a, hCB1b), as well as at mCB1 and rCB1. Discussion: There was no evidence suggesting G protein subtype selectivity for AEA and 2-AG at CB1, and this finding remained consistent across human receptor variants and different species.

简介内源性大麻素系统(ECS)是一种广泛存在的神经递质系统。ECS 的一个主要特点是存在多种内源性配体(内源性大麻素)。其中,研究最为广泛的是花生四烯丙基乙醇酰胺(AEA)和 2-花生四烯丙基甘油(2-AG),它们都是大麻素 CB1 受体的激动剂。在人体中,已经发现了三种 CB1 变体:hCB1(被认为是大脑中含量最高的 G 蛋白偶联受体),以及含量较低、研究较少的变体 hCB1a 和 hCB1b。尽管 CB1 与 Gi/o 家族的特定成员之间的相互作用特征尚不十分明确,但它偏好与抑制性 Gi/o 蛋白耦合。本研究旨在比较 AEA 和 2-AG 在 CB1 上诱导激活各种 G 蛋白亚型的情况。此外,我们还比较了人类 CB1(hCB1、hCB1a、hCB1b)的反应,并通过研究啮齿动物受体(mCB1、rCB1)探讨了物种差异。材料和方法:在瞬时表达 CB1 的 HEK293 细胞中,利用 TRUPATH 生物传感器的 G 蛋白解离测定法测量了单个 G 蛋白亚型的激活情况。利用 Z 因子分析评估了 TRUPATH 生物传感器的性能。使用偏差运算分析法分析了通路效力和效率,以确定 G 蛋白亚型对 AEA 和 2-AG 的选择性。结果:对 TRUPATH 生物传感器性能的初步筛选显示,我们的系统具有不同的灵敏度。根据生物传感器的性能,需要进一步鉴定的 G 蛋白亚型包括 Gi1、Gi3、GoA、GoB、GZ、G12 和 G13。在所有途径中,AEA 表现出部分激动作用,而 2-AG 则表现出完全或高效激动作用。值得注意的是,我们提供了 hCB1 受体与 G12 和 G13 蛋白偶联的直接证据。我们的研究结果没有显示任何 G 蛋白亚型选择性的证据。人类受体变体(hCB1、hCB1a、hCB1b)以及 mCB1 和 rCB1 也有类似的观察结果。讨论没有证据表明在 CB1 上 G 蛋白亚型对 AEA 和 2-AG 具有选择性,这一发现在人类受体变体和不同物种之间保持一致。
{"title":"No Evidence for Endocannabinoid-Induced G Protein Subtype Selectivity at Human and Rodent Cannabinoid CB<sub>1</sub> Receptors.","authors":"Xiaoxi Zheng, Beth Ehrlich, David Finlay, Michelle Glass","doi":"10.1089/can.2024.0133","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1089/can.2024.0133","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Introduction:</b> The endocannabinoid system (ECS) is a widespread neurotransmitter system. A key characteristic of the ECS is that there are multiple endogenous ligands (endocannabinoids). Of these, the most extensively studied are arachidonoyl ethanolamide (AEA) and 2-arachidonoyl-glycerol (2-AG), both act as agonists at the cannabinoid CB<sub>1</sub> receptor. In humans, three CB<sub>1</sub> variants have been identified: hCB<sub>1</sub>, considered the most abundant G protein-coupled receptor in the brain, alongside the less abundant and studied variants, hCB<sub>1a</sub> and hCB<sub>1b</sub>. CB<sub>1</sub> exhibits a preference for coupling with inhibitory G<sub>i/o</sub> proteins, although its interactions with specific members of the G<sub>i/o</sub> family remain poorly characterized. This study aimed to compare the AEA and 2-AG-induced activation of various G protein subtypes at CB<sub>1</sub>. Furthermore, we compared the response of human CB<sub>1</sub> (hCB<sub>1</sub>, hCB<sub>1a</sub>, hCB<sub>1b</sub>) and explored species differences by examining rodent receptors (mCB<sub>1</sub>, rCB<sub>1</sub>). <b>Materials and Methods:</b> Activation of individual G protein subtypes in HEK293 cells transiently expressing CB<sub>1</sub> was measured with G protein dissociation assay utilizing TRUPATH biosensors. The performance of the TRUPATH biosensors was evaluated using Z-factor analysis. Pathway potencies and efficacies were analyzed using the operational analysis of bias to determine G protein subtype selectivity for AEA and 2-AG. <b>Results:</b> Initial screening of TRUPATH biosensors performance revealed variable sensitivities within our system. Based on the biosensor performance, the G protein subtypes pursued for further characterization were G<sub>i1</sub>, G<sub>i3</sub>, G<sub>oA</sub>, G<sub>oB</sub>, G<sub>Z</sub>, G<sub>12</sub>, and G<sub>13</sub>. Across all pathways, AEA demonstrated partial agonism, whereas 2-AG exhibited full or high-efficacy agonism. Notably, we provide direct evidence that the hCB<sub>1</sub> receptor couples to G<sub>12</sub> and G<sub>13</sub> proteins. Our findings do not indicate any evidence of G protein subtype selectivity. Similar observations were made across the human receptor variants (hCB<sub>1</sub>, hCB<sub>1a</sub>, hCB<sub>1b</sub>), as well as at mCB<sub>1</sub> and rCB<sub>1</sub>. <b>Discussion:</b> There was no evidence suggesting G protein subtype selectivity for AEA and 2-AG at CB<sub>1</sub>, and this finding remained consistent across human receptor variants and different species.</p>","PeriodicalId":9386,"journal":{"name":"Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2024-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142380084","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Effects of Chronic, Low-Dose Cannabinoids, Cannabidiol, Delta-9-Tetrahydrocannabinol and a Combination of Both, on Amyloid Pathology in the 5xFAD Mouse Model of Alzheimer's Disease. 慢性低剂量大麻酚、大麻二酚、Delta-9-四氢大麻酚及其组合对阿尔茨海默病5xFAD小鼠模型淀粉样蛋白病理学的影响。
IF 3.1 4区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2023-10-20 DOI: 10.1089/can.2023.0101
María Andrea Arnanz, Samuel Ruiz de Martín Esteban, Ana María Martínez Relimpio, Neta Rimmerman, Nurit Tweezer Zaks, María Teresa Grande, Julián Romero

Background: There is an urgent need for novel therapies to treat Alzheimer's disease. Among others, the use of cannabinoids such as delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) and cannabidiol (CBD) has been proposed as a putative approach based on their anti-inflammatory effects. Methods: The present work was designed to explore the effects of chronic (28 days) treatment with low doses of cannabinoids: CBD (0.273 mg/kg), THC (0.205 mg/kg) or a combination of both (CBD:THC; 0.273 mg/kg:0.205 mg/kg) in the 5xFAD mouse model of AD. Results: Our data revealed that THC-treated 5xFAD mice (but not other treatment groups) exhibited anxiogenic and depressant-like behavior. A significant improvement in spatial memory was observed only in the CBD:THC-treated group. Interestingly, all cannabinoid-treated groups showed significantly increased cortical levels of the insoluble form of beta amyloid 1-42. These effects were not accompanied by changes in molecular parameters of inflammation at the mRNA or protein level. Conclusions: These data reveal differential effects of chronic, low-dose cannabinoids and point to a role of these cannabinoids in the processing of amyloid peptides in the brains of 5xFAD mice.

背景:迫切需要治疗阿尔茨海默病的新疗法。除其他外,大麻素如δ-9-四氢大麻酚(THC)和大麻素二醇(CBD)的使用已被认为是一种基于其抗炎作用的假定方法。方法:本研究旨在探讨低剂量大麻素CBD(0.273)慢性(28天)治疗的效果 mg/kg)、四氢大麻酚(0.205 mg/kg)或两者的组合(CBD:THC;0.273 mg/kg:0.205 mg/kg)。结果:我们的数据显示,THC治疗的5xFAD小鼠(但不是其他治疗组)表现出焦虑和抑郁样行为。仅在CBD:THC治疗组中观察到空间记忆的显著改善。有趣的是,所有大麻素治疗组的皮质中不溶性β淀粉样蛋白1-42的水平都显著增加。这些影响没有伴随着mRNA或蛋白质水平上炎症分子参数的变化。结论:这些数据揭示了慢性低剂量大麻素的不同作用,并指出这些大麻素在5xFAD小鼠大脑中淀粉样肽加工中的作用。
{"title":"Effects of Chronic, Low-Dose Cannabinoids, Cannabidiol, Delta-9-Tetrahydrocannabinol and a Combination of Both, on Amyloid Pathology in the 5xFAD Mouse Model of Alzheimer's Disease.","authors":"María Andrea Arnanz, Samuel Ruiz de Martín Esteban, Ana María Martínez Relimpio, Neta Rimmerman, Nurit Tweezer Zaks, María Teresa Grande, Julián Romero","doi":"10.1089/can.2023.0101","DOIUrl":"10.1089/can.2023.0101","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> There is an urgent need for novel therapies to treat Alzheimer's disease. Among others, the use of cannabinoids such as delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) and cannabidiol (CBD) has been proposed as a putative approach based on their anti-inflammatory effects. <b>Methods:</b> The present work was designed to explore the effects of chronic (28 days) treatment with low doses of cannabinoids: CBD (0.273 mg/kg), THC (0.205 mg/kg) or a combination of both (CBD:THC; 0.273 mg/kg:0.205 mg/kg) in the 5xFAD mouse model of AD. <b>Results:</b> Our data revealed that THC-treated 5xFAD mice (but not other treatment groups) exhibited anxiogenic and depressant-like behavior. A significant improvement in spatial memory was observed only in the CBD:THC-treated group. Interestingly, all cannabinoid-treated groups showed significantly increased cortical levels of the insoluble form of beta amyloid 1-42. These effects were not accompanied by changes in molecular parameters of inflammation at the mRNA or protein level. <b>Conclusions:</b> These data reveal differential effects of chronic, low-dose cannabinoids and point to a role of these cannabinoids in the processing of amyloid peptides in the brains of 5xFAD mice.</p>","PeriodicalId":9386,"journal":{"name":"Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research","volume":" ","pages":"1312-1325"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"49674611","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1