Routine screening for gestational diabetes: a review.

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Current Opinion in Obstetrics & Gynecology Pub Date : 2024-04-01 Epub Date: 2024-01-15 DOI:10.1097/GCO.0000000000000940
Minhazur R Sarker, Gladys A Ramos
{"title":"Routine screening for gestational diabetes: a review.","authors":"Minhazur R Sarker, Gladys A Ramos","doi":"10.1097/GCO.0000000000000940","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Rates of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) throughout the world continue to increase associated with the increasing rates of obesity. Given this epidemiologic burden, the importance of proper screening, diagnosis, and management cannot be understated. This review focuses on the current screening guidelines utilized throughout the world and new data recently published regarding the most optimal screening techniques and future directions for research.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Despite unanimous opinion that GDM warrants screening, the optimal screening regimen remains controversial. Notably, in the United States per the consensus recommendation by the American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology and the Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine, a 2-step screening approach is often used. Recently, there have been multiple studies published that have compared the 1-step and 2-step screening process with respect to GDM incidence and perinatal outcomes. These new findings are summarized below.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Utilization of the 1-step screening as opposed to the 2-step screening results in an increased diagnosis of GDM without significant population level benefit in outcomes. However, these studies remain underpowered to allow for meaningful comparison of outcomes in those diagnosed with GDM.</p>","PeriodicalId":55194,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Obstetrics & Gynecology","volume":" ","pages":"97-103"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Obstetrics & Gynecology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/GCO.0000000000000940","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose of review: Rates of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) throughout the world continue to increase associated with the increasing rates of obesity. Given this epidemiologic burden, the importance of proper screening, diagnosis, and management cannot be understated. This review focuses on the current screening guidelines utilized throughout the world and new data recently published regarding the most optimal screening techniques and future directions for research.

Recent findings: Despite unanimous opinion that GDM warrants screening, the optimal screening regimen remains controversial. Notably, in the United States per the consensus recommendation by the American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology and the Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine, a 2-step screening approach is often used. Recently, there have been multiple studies published that have compared the 1-step and 2-step screening process with respect to GDM incidence and perinatal outcomes. These new findings are summarized below.

Summary: Utilization of the 1-step screening as opposed to the 2-step screening results in an increased diagnosis of GDM without significant population level benefit in outcomes. However, these studies remain underpowered to allow for meaningful comparison of outcomes in those diagnosed with GDM.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
妊娠糖尿病的常规筛查:综述。
审查目的:随着肥胖率的上升,全世界妊娠糖尿病(GDM)的发病率也在持续上升。鉴于这种流行病学负担,正确筛查、诊断和管理的重要性不容低估。这篇综述主要介绍了目前全世界使用的筛查指南,以及最近发表的关于最佳筛查技术和未来研究方向的新数据:尽管一致认为 GDM 需要筛查,但最佳筛查方案仍存在争议。值得注意的是,在美国,根据美国妇产科学会和母胎医学会的一致建议,通常采用两步筛查法。最近,有多项研究就 GDM 发病率和围产期结局对一步筛查法和两步筛查法进行了比较。总结:与两步筛查法相比,使用一步筛查法可增加 GDM 的诊断率,但对人群的预后没有明显的益处。然而,这些研究的研究力量仍然不足,无法对确诊的 GDM 患者的预后进行有意义的比较。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
104
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: ​​​​​​​Current Opinion in Obstetrics and Gynecology is a bimonthly publication offering a unique and wide ranging perspective on the key developments in the field. Each issue features hand-picked review articles from our team of expert editors. With eleven disciplines published across the year – including reproductive endocrinology, gynecologic cancer and fertility– every issue also contains annotated references detailing the merits of the most important papers.
期刊最新文献
Access to maternity care: challenges and solutions for improving equity across US communities. Contemporary uses of "lethal" or "life limiting" terminology in perinatal research. Rho(D) immune globulin shortage and fetal Rh(D) screening with cell-free DNA. State of the art endocrine treatments for patients diagnosed with endometrial cancer in 2025. Sleep disturbance and menopause.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1