Enhancing stakeholder engagement in sustainable forest management: A multi‐domain comparative analysis of forest‐related beliefs, values, and behaviors of Canadian Aboriginal and non‐Aboriginal groups

Zhang Yiwen, Shashi Kant, Ilan Vertinsky
{"title":"Enhancing stakeholder engagement in sustainable forest management: A multi‐domain comparative analysis of forest‐related beliefs, values, and behaviors of Canadian Aboriginal and non‐Aboriginal groups","authors":"Zhang Yiwen, Shashi Kant, Ilan Vertinsky","doi":"10.1002/sd.2895","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The study aims to understand the variations in the domain‐specific pro‐sustainable‐forest‐management behavior (PSFMBs) and their explanatory factors across ecological, economic, recreational, and Aboriginal domains and between Aboriginal and non‐Aboriginal groups. A hybrid model of PSFMB, which integrates environmental psychology and resource economics perspectives, is conceptualized and estimated using multi‐group path analysis and data from three Aboriginal and three non‐Aboriginal communities in Ontario, Canada. Results show that both groups make substantial pro‐SFM contributions, but the contributions and their influencing factors differ across domains and groups. For Aboriginals, environmental worldviews and assigned forest values are the only influencing factors, while for non‐Aboriginals, income and forest environmental conditions play dominant roles. The findings confirm the fundamental differences in the roles of beliefs, values, and situational factors in influencing the PSFMB of Aboriginal and non‐Aboriginal groups, highlight the need for theoretical lenses that account for cultural differences, and contribute to the development of inclusive policies that respect the unique values of different social groups.","PeriodicalId":510523,"journal":{"name":"Sustainable Development","volume":"81 19","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sustainable Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2895","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The study aims to understand the variations in the domain‐specific pro‐sustainable‐forest‐management behavior (PSFMBs) and their explanatory factors across ecological, economic, recreational, and Aboriginal domains and between Aboriginal and non‐Aboriginal groups. A hybrid model of PSFMB, which integrates environmental psychology and resource economics perspectives, is conceptualized and estimated using multi‐group path analysis and data from three Aboriginal and three non‐Aboriginal communities in Ontario, Canada. Results show that both groups make substantial pro‐SFM contributions, but the contributions and their influencing factors differ across domains and groups. For Aboriginals, environmental worldviews and assigned forest values are the only influencing factors, while for non‐Aboriginals, income and forest environmental conditions play dominant roles. The findings confirm the fundamental differences in the roles of beliefs, values, and situational factors in influencing the PSFMB of Aboriginal and non‐Aboriginal groups, highlight the need for theoretical lenses that account for cultural differences, and contribute to the development of inclusive policies that respect the unique values of different social groups.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
加强利益相关者对可持续森林管理的参与:加拿大原住民和非原住民群体与森林有关的信仰、价值观和行为的多领域比较分析
本研究旨在了解生态、经济、娱乐和原住民等特定领域的可持续森林管理行为(PSFMB)及其解释因素在原住民和非原住民群体之间的差异。利用多组路径分析和来自加拿大安大略省三个原住民社区和三个非原住民社区的数据,对综合了环境心理学和资源经济学观点的 PSFMB 混合模型进行了概念化和估算。结果表明,这两个群体都做出了大量有利于可持续森林管理的贡献,但不同领域和群体的贡献及其影响因素各不相同。对原住民而言,环境世界观和指定的森林价值观是唯一的影响因素,而对非原住民而言,收入和森林环境条件起着主导作用。研究结果证实了信仰、价值观和情境因素在影响原住民和非原住民群体的 PSFMB 方面存在根本性差异,强调了需要考虑文化差异的理论视角,并有助于制定尊重不同社会群体独特价值观的包容性政策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Unleashing digital transformation to achieve the sustainable development goals across multiple sectors Exploring the path to achieve sustainable agricultural development: An empirical analysis based on the modernization of agriculture in six central China provinces Global perspectives on club convergence: Unraveling the nexus of human and sustainable development in the face of corruption Toward sustainable cities: Assessing drivers of SDG performance in Italian municipalities The smart future for sustainable development: Artificial intelligence solutions for sustainable urbanization
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1