IMPROVING EFFICIENCY IN PRE-ECLAMPSIA DIAGNOSIS: SPOT URINARY PROTEIN/CREATININE RATIO

PRAVEEN SINGH, Pooja Arnote, Kajal Thakur
{"title":"IMPROVING EFFICIENCY IN PRE-ECLAMPSIA DIAGNOSIS: SPOT URINARY PROTEIN/CREATININE RATIO","authors":"PRAVEEN SINGH, Pooja Arnote, Kajal Thakur","doi":"10.22159/ijcpr.2024v16i1.4007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: Because pre-eclampsia can cause difficulties, it presents a serious threat to maternal healthcare. The well-being of both the mother and the fetus depends on a prompt and precise diagnosis. There are drawbacks to using conventional techniques, such as collecting urine for a whole day to determine proteinuria. Although the spot urine protein/creatinine ratio is a faster option, its clinical value is yet unknown. \nMethods: The purpose of this cross-sectional study, which ran from July 1, 2018, to June 30, 2019, was to evaluate the spot urine protein/creatinine ratio in preeclamptic pregnant women vs the traditional 24 h urine protein collection technique. Ninety inpatients in all who satisfied certain inclusion and exclusion criteria were included. \nResults: Compared to comparable research by Hanumant et al. (13%), 6.66% of patients in our study had abnormal fundus examination findings. Papilloedema was absent from all participants, and the cautious management of anomalies was consistent across investigations. In line with the results of Hossain et al. and Sapna et al., the mean urine protein creatinine ratio in our investigation was 1.75±2.32. A smaller ratio was discovered by Umran et al., whereas Jung Hwa Park et al. claimed a larger ratio. Jung Hwa Park et al. also showed a greater mean protein excretion during a 24 h period (2713±2003 mg/d). \nConclusion: This research at Kamla Nehru Hospital emphasizes the spot urine protein/creatinine ratio's potential as an effective pre-eclampsia diagnostic tool. In healthcare settings with limited resources, prompt detection of severe proteinuria can improve maternal and fetal outcomes by streamlining patient treatment.","PeriodicalId":13875,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Current Pharmaceutical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Current Pharmaceutical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22159/ijcpr.2024v16i1.4007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Because pre-eclampsia can cause difficulties, it presents a serious threat to maternal healthcare. The well-being of both the mother and the fetus depends on a prompt and precise diagnosis. There are drawbacks to using conventional techniques, such as collecting urine for a whole day to determine proteinuria. Although the spot urine protein/creatinine ratio is a faster option, its clinical value is yet unknown. Methods: The purpose of this cross-sectional study, which ran from July 1, 2018, to June 30, 2019, was to evaluate the spot urine protein/creatinine ratio in preeclamptic pregnant women vs the traditional 24 h urine protein collection technique. Ninety inpatients in all who satisfied certain inclusion and exclusion criteria were included. Results: Compared to comparable research by Hanumant et al. (13%), 6.66% of patients in our study had abnormal fundus examination findings. Papilloedema was absent from all participants, and the cautious management of anomalies was consistent across investigations. In line with the results of Hossain et al. and Sapna et al., the mean urine protein creatinine ratio in our investigation was 1.75±2.32. A smaller ratio was discovered by Umran et al., whereas Jung Hwa Park et al. claimed a larger ratio. Jung Hwa Park et al. also showed a greater mean protein excretion during a 24 h period (2713±2003 mg/d). Conclusion: This research at Kamla Nehru Hospital emphasizes the spot urine protein/creatinine ratio's potential as an effective pre-eclampsia diagnostic tool. In healthcare settings with limited resources, prompt detection of severe proteinuria can improve maternal and fetal outcomes by streamlining patient treatment.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
提高子痫前期诊断的效率:定点尿蛋白/肌酐比值
目的:先兆子痫会给产妇的健康带来严重威胁。母亲和胎儿的健康取决于及时和准确的诊断。使用传统技术(如收集一整天的尿液来确定蛋白尿)有其缺点。尽管定点尿蛋白/肌酐比值是一种更快捷的选择,但其临床价值尚不清楚。研究方法这项横断面研究从 2018 年 7 月 1 日开始,至 2019 年 6 月 30 日结束,目的是评估点尿蛋白/肌酐比值在先兆子痫孕妇中与传统的 24 小时尿蛋白收集技术的对比情况。共纳入符合特定纳入和排除标准的 90 名住院患者。研究结果与 Hanumant 等人的类似研究(13%)相比,我们的研究中有 6.66% 的患者眼底检查结果异常。所有参与者均未出现乳头水肿,且在不同检查中对异常情况的谨慎处理是一致的。与 Hossain 等人和 Sapna 等人的研究结果一致,我们研究中的平均尿蛋白肌酐比值为 1.75±2.32。Umran 等人的比值较小,而 Jung Hwa Park 等人的比值较大。Jung Hwa Park 等人的研究还显示,24 小时内的平均蛋白质排泄量更大(2713±2003 毫克/天)。结论卡姆拉-尼赫鲁医院的这项研究强调了定点尿蛋白/肌酐比值作为子痫前期有效诊断工具的潜力。在资源有限的医疗环境中,及时发现严重蛋白尿可通过简化患者治疗来改善孕产妇和胎儿的预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A COMPARATIVE STUDY BETWEEN OPEN CHOLECYSTECTOMY VERSUS LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY STUDY OF PREVALENCE OF POLYCYSTIC OVARIAN SYNDROME AMONG ADOLESCENT AND YOUNG ADULT STUDENTS OF NAVODAYA GROUP OF INSTITUTIONS PREVALENCE OF KELL BLOOD GROUP SYSTEM IN BLOOD DONORS ATTENDING A TERTIARY CARE CENTRE IN NORTHWESTERN INDIA APPLICATION OF VALIDATED RP-HPLC METHOD FOR SIMULTANEOUS DETERMINATION OF METAXALONE AND DICLOFENAC POTASSIUM IN PLASMA MORPHOMETRIC VARIATION OF FORAMEN OVALE IN DRY ADULT SKULL OF INDIAN POPULATION WITH CLINICAL CORRELATIONS
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1