The Impact of Secondary Catheter-Related Bloodstream Infection on the Course of COVID-19 Infection

Pub Date : 2024-01-15 DOI:10.1097/ipc.0000000000001343
Y. Nadir, P. Kiran, Damla Erturk, Uğur Uzun, T. Yavuz, G. Ersan, Hale Turan Ozden, S. S. Senger
{"title":"The Impact of Secondary Catheter-Related Bloodstream Infection on the Course of COVID-19 Infection","authors":"Y. Nadir, P. Kiran, Damla Erturk, Uğur Uzun, T. Yavuz, G. Ersan, Hale Turan Ozden, S. S. Senger","doi":"10.1097/ipc.0000000000001343","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n \n Secondary bacterial infections can worsen the prognosis for COVID-19, especially in patients with severe infections. Thus, we aim to investigate the effect of secondary catheter-related bloodstream infections on the course of COVID-19 infection.\n \n \n \n This is a retrospective, nested case-control study and included 236 confirmed COVID-19 infection hospitalized patients, divided into 2 groups (COVID-19, n = 64; non–COVID-19, n = 172) according to SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR results.\n \n \n \n The age, sex, and prevalence of chronic diseases were similar in both groups. Klebsiella pneumoniae (31.2%) and Acinetobacter baumannii (21.9%) were the predominant microorganisms in the COVID-19 group. Only A. baumannii was statistically higher in the COVID-19 group (P = 0.046). There were no significant differences in terms of resistance profiles. The 30-day mortality was significantly higher in the COVID-19 group (56.3%) than in the non–COVID-19 group (38.4%) (P = 0.014). There was no significant difference in the length of stay between the 2 groups. The multiple logistic regression analysis of risk factors for 30-day mortality revealed that COVID-19 positivity (odds ratio [OR], 2.167; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.056–4.446; P = 0.035), infection with extensively drug-resistant bacteria (OR, 2.949; 95% CI, 1.311–6.636; P = 0.009), and infection with pandrug-resistant bacteria (OR, 3.601; 95% CI, 1.213–10.689; P = 0.021) were independent risk factors for 30-day mortality.\n \n \n \n As a conclusion, this study demonstrated that COVID-19 positivity is an independent risk factor for 30-day mortality of secondary catheter-related bloodstream infections. Gram-negative bacteria were the predominant microorganisms, with A. baumannii being statistically higher in the COVID-19 group compared with the non–COVID-19 group. However, there were no statistically significant differences in terms of the resistance profile of microorganisms.\n","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":"28 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ipc.0000000000001343","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Secondary bacterial infections can worsen the prognosis for COVID-19, especially in patients with severe infections. Thus, we aim to investigate the effect of secondary catheter-related bloodstream infections on the course of COVID-19 infection. This is a retrospective, nested case-control study and included 236 confirmed COVID-19 infection hospitalized patients, divided into 2 groups (COVID-19, n = 64; non–COVID-19, n = 172) according to SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR results. The age, sex, and prevalence of chronic diseases were similar in both groups. Klebsiella pneumoniae (31.2%) and Acinetobacter baumannii (21.9%) were the predominant microorganisms in the COVID-19 group. Only A. baumannii was statistically higher in the COVID-19 group (P = 0.046). There were no significant differences in terms of resistance profiles. The 30-day mortality was significantly higher in the COVID-19 group (56.3%) than in the non–COVID-19 group (38.4%) (P = 0.014). There was no significant difference in the length of stay between the 2 groups. The multiple logistic regression analysis of risk factors for 30-day mortality revealed that COVID-19 positivity (odds ratio [OR], 2.167; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.056–4.446; P = 0.035), infection with extensively drug-resistant bacteria (OR, 2.949; 95% CI, 1.311–6.636; P = 0.009), and infection with pandrug-resistant bacteria (OR, 3.601; 95% CI, 1.213–10.689; P = 0.021) were independent risk factors for 30-day mortality. As a conclusion, this study demonstrated that COVID-19 positivity is an independent risk factor for 30-day mortality of secondary catheter-related bloodstream infections. Gram-negative bacteria were the predominant microorganisms, with A. baumannii being statistically higher in the COVID-19 group compared with the non–COVID-19 group. However, there were no statistically significant differences in terms of the resistance profile of microorganisms.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
继发性导管相关血流感染对 COVID-19 感染病程的影响
继发性细菌感染会恶化 COVID-19 的预后,尤其是严重感染的患者。因此,我们旨在研究继发性导管相关血流感染对 COVID-19 感染病程的影响。 这是一项回顾性、巢式病例对照研究,共纳入 236 名确诊 COVID-19 感染的住院患者,根据 SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR 结果分为两组(COVID-19,64 人;非 COVID-19,172 人)。 两组患者的年龄、性别和慢性病患病率相似。肺炎克雷伯菌(31.2%)和鲍曼不动杆菌(21.9%)是 COVID-19 组的主要微生物。据统计,只有鲍曼不动杆菌在 COVID-19 组中含量更高(P = 0.046)。耐药性方面没有明显差异。COVID-19 组的 30 天死亡率(56.3%)明显高于非 COVID-19 组(38.4%)(P = 0.014)。两组患者的住院时间无明显差异。对 30 天死亡率风险因素的多重逻辑回归分析显示,COVID-19 阳性(几率比 [OR],2.167;95% 置信区间 [CI],1.056-4.446;P = 0.035)、感染广泛耐药菌(OR,2.949;95% CI,1.311-6.636;P = 0.009)和感染泛耐药菌(OR,3.601;95% CI,1.213-10.689;P = 0.021)是 30 天死亡率的独立风险因素。 综上所述,本研究表明 COVID-19 阳性是继发性导管相关血流感染 30 天死亡率的独立风险因素。革兰氏阴性菌是主要的微生物,COVID-19 阳性组中的鲍曼不动杆菌在统计学上高于非 COVID-19 阳性组。不过,在微生物的耐药性方面,两者之间并无统计学上的显著差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1