Community structure and regeneration capacity of mangrove forest

Marylene M. Demapitan, Florence Roy P. Salvaña, Cherie Cano-Mangaoang
{"title":"Community structure and regeneration capacity of mangrove forest","authors":"Marylene M. Demapitan, Florence Roy P. Salvaña, Cherie Cano-Mangaoang","doi":"10.22364/eeb.21.13","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Mangrove forests play a vital role in the environment. They provide a number of ecosystem services for supporting marine biodiversity, humans, and other living organisms inhabiting the area. This study aimed to determine the community structure and regeneration capacity of mangrove forests in Lebak, Sultan Kudarat, Philippines. Community structure was determined through relative density, relative frequency, relative dominance, and importance value. Using the center point circular plot method, 13 plots with 40 m diameter were established in two sampling sites: natural stand and reforested. Shannon-Weiner diversity and evenness indexes were used to determine species diversity and distribution, respectively. This study recorded a total of 14 462 individuals within the 1256 m² sampling plots, having Rhizophoraceae as the most abundant family with seven species that cover about 71% of both mangrove ecosystems. The vegetation analysis revealed that Ceriops tagal (70.35%) and Rhizophora mucronata (96.51%) had the highest importance value in the natural stand and reforested mangrove forests, respectively. Furthermore, these two species were also accounted for having the highest regeneration contribution among all species in each site. Shannon-Weiner diversity index revealed that the natural stand was more diverse compared to the reforested mangrove forest. However, the Shannon-Weiner evenness index showed that species in the reforested mangrove forest are more evenly distributed than species in the natural stand. Natural mangrove stands in Lebak have complex community structure and have higher regeneration capacity than the reforested mangrove forest. With this, the study suggested continuing the best practices employed for mangrove conservation in the area and crafting a strategic plan for sustainable mangrove resource utilization.","PeriodicalId":53270,"journal":{"name":"Environmental and Experimental Biology","volume":"119 16","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental and Experimental Biology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22364/eeb.21.13","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Mangrove forests play a vital role in the environment. They provide a number of ecosystem services for supporting marine biodiversity, humans, and other living organisms inhabiting the area. This study aimed to determine the community structure and regeneration capacity of mangrove forests in Lebak, Sultan Kudarat, Philippines. Community structure was determined through relative density, relative frequency, relative dominance, and importance value. Using the center point circular plot method, 13 plots with 40 m diameter were established in two sampling sites: natural stand and reforested. Shannon-Weiner diversity and evenness indexes were used to determine species diversity and distribution, respectively. This study recorded a total of 14 462 individuals within the 1256 m² sampling plots, having Rhizophoraceae as the most abundant family with seven species that cover about 71% of both mangrove ecosystems. The vegetation analysis revealed that Ceriops tagal (70.35%) and Rhizophora mucronata (96.51%) had the highest importance value in the natural stand and reforested mangrove forests, respectively. Furthermore, these two species were also accounted for having the highest regeneration contribution among all species in each site. Shannon-Weiner diversity index revealed that the natural stand was more diverse compared to the reforested mangrove forest. However, the Shannon-Weiner evenness index showed that species in the reforested mangrove forest are more evenly distributed than species in the natural stand. Natural mangrove stands in Lebak have complex community structure and have higher regeneration capacity than the reforested mangrove forest. With this, the study suggested continuing the best practices employed for mangrove conservation in the area and crafting a strategic plan for sustainable mangrove resource utilization.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
红树林的群落结构和再生能力
红树林在环境中发挥着至关重要的作用。它们为支持海洋生物多样性、人类和居住在该地区的其他生物提供了许多生态系统服务。本研究旨在确定菲律宾苏丹库达拉特省莱巴克红树林的群落结构和再生能力。群落结构通过相对密度、相对频率、相对优势度和重要性值来确定。采用中心点圆形地块法,在两个取样点(天然林地和重新造林地)建立了 13 个直径为 40 米的地块。采用香农-韦纳多样性指数和均匀度指数分别测定物种多样性和分布。这项研究在 1256 平方米的取样地块中记录了共计 14 462 个物种,其中根瘤菌科物种最多,有 7 个物种,约占两个红树林生态系统的 71%。植被分析表明,Ceriops tagal(70.35%)和 Rhizophora mucronata(96.51%)分别在天然林地和重新造林的红树林中具有最高的重要性。此外,在每个地点的所有物种中,这两个物种的再生贡献率也最高。香农-韦纳(Shannon-Weiner)多样性指数显示,自然林分的多样性高于重新造林的红树林。然而,香农-韦纳均匀度指数显示,重新造林的红树林中的物种比自然林分中的物种分布更均匀。与重新造林的红树林相比,勒巴克的天然红树林具有复杂的群落结构和更高的再生能力。因此,该研究建议继续在该地区采用保护红树林的最佳做法,并制定可持续利用红树林资源的战略计划。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
New food plants for insects Vilbasteana oculata (Hemiptera: Cicadellidae) and Otiorhynchus smreczynskii (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) in the Baltic region Foliar application of commercial humic substances for possible increase of nutrient status and yield of oilseed rape Abstracts of the 82nd Scientific Conference of the University of Latvia Drought tolerance improvement for grain yield of a modern rice variety based on morphological and physiological response Community structure and regeneration capacity of mangrove forest
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1