Incidence and Outcome of Iatrogenic Gallbladder Perforation during Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy in a Tertiary Care Hospital

Sheikh Sabbir Ahmed, Mst Wazira Shefat Jahan, Shakhawat Hossain
{"title":"Incidence and Outcome of Iatrogenic Gallbladder Perforation during Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy in a Tertiary Care Hospital","authors":"Sheikh Sabbir Ahmed, Mst Wazira Shefat Jahan, Shakhawat Hossain","doi":"10.36347/sjams.2024.v12i01.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: in developing countries, patients getting admitted into hospital is influenced by gallbladder stone. In this study, the incidence and outcome of iatrogenic gallbladder perforation during laparoscopic cholecystectomy was observed and studied for further development in this sector in a tertiary care hospital. Aim of the study: The aim of this study was to find out the incidence and outcome of iatrogenic gallbladder perforation during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Methods: This prospective observational study was conducted in Department of Surgery, Combined Military Hospital (CMH) Dhaka, Bangladesh during the period from June 2018 to November 2018. This study had institutional review board approval and informed consent for 100 patients age range 31-70 years (mean 50.3±10.6) in gallbladder perforation group and in no perforation group the range was 25 to 62 years (mean 47.9±12.3). The patients went through laparoscopic cholecystectomy through four port and gallbladder was removed through hepigastric port. The ultrasonographic report of all patients were collected. Result: In the present study, majority 86 patients were found normal body weight (BMI 18.5-24.9 kg/m2) but female patients were high in number of affected list, 14(73.7%) in gallbladder perforation group and 56(69.1%) in no perforation group. A single stone is mainly found in no perforation group which is 32(39.5%). Multiple stone is found less in both of the groups respectively. Staying in the hospital was also higher in gallbladder group in comparison with no perforation group. Conclusion: According to the study, perforation in gallbladder due to laparoscopic cholecystectomy is not deniable (19%). This can result in peroperative pain and more stay in hospital.","PeriodicalId":504829,"journal":{"name":"Scholars Journal of Applied Medical Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scholars Journal of Applied Medical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36347/sjams.2024.v12i01.009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: in developing countries, patients getting admitted into hospital is influenced by gallbladder stone. In this study, the incidence and outcome of iatrogenic gallbladder perforation during laparoscopic cholecystectomy was observed and studied for further development in this sector in a tertiary care hospital. Aim of the study: The aim of this study was to find out the incidence and outcome of iatrogenic gallbladder perforation during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Methods: This prospective observational study was conducted in Department of Surgery, Combined Military Hospital (CMH) Dhaka, Bangladesh during the period from June 2018 to November 2018. This study had institutional review board approval and informed consent for 100 patients age range 31-70 years (mean 50.3±10.6) in gallbladder perforation group and in no perforation group the range was 25 to 62 years (mean 47.9±12.3). The patients went through laparoscopic cholecystectomy through four port and gallbladder was removed through hepigastric port. The ultrasonographic report of all patients were collected. Result: In the present study, majority 86 patients were found normal body weight (BMI 18.5-24.9 kg/m2) but female patients were high in number of affected list, 14(73.7%) in gallbladder perforation group and 56(69.1%) in no perforation group. A single stone is mainly found in no perforation group which is 32(39.5%). Multiple stone is found less in both of the groups respectively. Staying in the hospital was also higher in gallbladder group in comparison with no perforation group. Conclusion: According to the study, perforation in gallbladder due to laparoscopic cholecystectomy is not deniable (19%). This can result in peroperative pain and more stay in hospital.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
一家三甲医院腹腔镜胆囊切除术中先天性胆囊穿孔的发生率和结果
导言:在发展中国家,胆囊结石会影响患者入院治疗。本研究观察了腹腔镜胆囊切除术中先天性胆囊穿孔的发生率和结果,并对该领域的进一步发展进行了研究。研究目的本研究旨在了解腹腔镜胆囊切除术中先天性胆囊穿孔的发生率和结果。研究方法:这项前瞻性观察研究于 2018 年 6 月至 2018 年 11 月期间在孟加拉国达卡联合军事医院(CMH)外科进行。该研究获得了机构审查委员会的批准和知情同意,胆囊穿孔组 100 例患者的年龄范围为 31-70 岁(平均 50.3±10.6)岁,无穿孔组患者的年龄范围为 25-62 岁(平均 47.9±12.3)岁。患者通过四孔腹腔镜进行胆囊切除术,胆囊通过肝门切除。收集了所有患者的超声波报告。结果:在本研究中,大多数 86 例患者体重正常(体重指数为 18.5-24.9 kg/m2),但女性患者人数较多,胆囊穿孔组有 14 例(73.7%),无穿孔组有 56 例(69.1%)。单发结石主要出现在无穿孔组,占 32(39.5%)。两组中发现的多发性结石都较少。与无穿孔组相比,胆囊组的住院时间也更长。结论根据这项研究,腹腔镜胆囊切除术导致的胆囊穿孔是不可否认的(19%)。这可能导致围手术期疼痛和住院时间延长。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Investigating the Correlation between Semi quantitative HBeAg and HBV DNA Levels: Validating HBeAg Quantification as a Marker in Asymptomatic HBeAg-Positive Carriers Evaluating Intraocular Pressure Outcomes Following Ocular Contusion “Medical Induction for Intrauterine Fetal Death (IUFD) in a Tertiary Care Hospital” Prediction of Urosepsis Following PCNL: A Retrospective Cohort Study Port Site Local Anaesthetics Application Versus Standard Analgesics for Postoperative Pain Control in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1