Optimized three‐phase hollow fiber liquid‐phase automated microextraction and its application in ultra‐trace analysis of three pyrethroids in water and fruit samples using high‐performance liquid chromatography‐diode array detection

IF 1.3 Q4 CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL SEPARATION SCIENCE PLUS Pub Date : 2024-01-10 DOI:10.1002/sscp.202300143
Mohsen Nikdel, Alireza Nezami, Y. Yamini, Behnam Ghorbani Nezhad, A. Nazaripour, Matin Baghani, Milad Rahimzadegan
{"title":"Optimized three‐phase hollow fiber liquid‐phase automated microextraction and its application in ultra‐trace analysis of three pyrethroids in water and fruit samples using high‐performance liquid chromatography‐diode array detection","authors":"Mohsen Nikdel, Alireza Nezami, Y. Yamini, Behnam Ghorbani Nezhad, A. Nazaripour, Matin Baghani, Milad Rahimzadegan","doi":"10.1002/sscp.202300143","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the present manuscript, an automated three‐phase hollow fiber liquid‐phase microextraction followed by high‐performance liquid chromatography‐diode array detection is applied for the extraction and determination of three pyrethroids, deltamethrin, fenpropathrin, and permethrin in water and fruit samples. N‐dodecane was selected as a supported liquid membrane (SLM) and its polarity was adjusted by trioctylphosphine oxide one‐variable‐at‐a‐time method was used in order to achieve optimal hollow fiber liquid‐phase microextraction parameters such as type of organic acceptor phase, the composition of SLM, ionic strength of sample solution, extraction time, length of hollow fibers and stirring speed. Under the optimal conditions, the calibration curves for the three pyrethroids were plotted, and figures of merit of the proposed method were calculated. The linear dynamic ranges were in the range of 0.9–200, 0.75–200, and 1.5–200 μg/L for deltamethrin, fenpropathrin, and permethrin, with the coefficient of determination better than 0.998. The limits of detection were in the range of 0.3, 0.25, and 0.5 and the limits of quantification were in the range of 0.9, 0.75, and 1.5 μg/L for deltamethrin, fenpropathrin, and permethrin, respectively. The precision of the method was evaluated in terms of relative standard deviation at two different concentration levels 10 and 50 μg/L. The results of real sample analysis in cucumber exhibited high sensitivity, excellent sample clean‐up, favorable repeatability, and suitable accuracy.","PeriodicalId":21639,"journal":{"name":"SEPARATION SCIENCE PLUS","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SEPARATION SCIENCE PLUS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/sscp.202300143","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the present manuscript, an automated three‐phase hollow fiber liquid‐phase microextraction followed by high‐performance liquid chromatography‐diode array detection is applied for the extraction and determination of three pyrethroids, deltamethrin, fenpropathrin, and permethrin in water and fruit samples. N‐dodecane was selected as a supported liquid membrane (SLM) and its polarity was adjusted by trioctylphosphine oxide one‐variable‐at‐a‐time method was used in order to achieve optimal hollow fiber liquid‐phase microextraction parameters such as type of organic acceptor phase, the composition of SLM, ionic strength of sample solution, extraction time, length of hollow fibers and stirring speed. Under the optimal conditions, the calibration curves for the three pyrethroids were plotted, and figures of merit of the proposed method were calculated. The linear dynamic ranges were in the range of 0.9–200, 0.75–200, and 1.5–200 μg/L for deltamethrin, fenpropathrin, and permethrin, with the coefficient of determination better than 0.998. The limits of detection were in the range of 0.3, 0.25, and 0.5 and the limits of quantification were in the range of 0.9, 0.75, and 1.5 μg/L for deltamethrin, fenpropathrin, and permethrin, respectively. The precision of the method was evaluated in terms of relative standard deviation at two different concentration levels 10 and 50 μg/L. The results of real sample analysis in cucumber exhibited high sensitivity, excellent sample clean‐up, favorable repeatability, and suitable accuracy.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
优化的三相中空纤维液相自动微萃取及其在利用高效液相色谱-二极管阵列检测法对水和水果样品中的三种拟除虫菊酯进行超痕量分析中的应用
本手稿采用自动化三相中空纤维液相微萃取-高效液相色谱-二极管阵列检测技术萃取测定了水和水果样品中的溴氰菊酯、苯丙菊酯和氯菊酯三种拟除虫菊酯。采用三辛基氧化膦一次一变量法调节极性,以获得最佳的中空纤维液相微萃取参数,如有机接受相的类型、中空纤维液相微萃取膜的组成、样品溶液的离子强度、萃取时间、中空纤维长度和搅拌速度等。在最佳条件下,绘制了三种拟除虫菊酯类化合物的定标曲线,并计算了该方法的优度。溴氰菊酯、苯丙菊酯和氯菊酯的线性范围分别为0.9~200、0.75~200和1.5~200 μg/L,测定系数均优于0.998。溴氰菊酯、苯丙菊酯和氯菊酯的检出限分别为 0.3、0.25 和 0.5 μg/L,定量限分别为 0.9、0.75 和 1.5 μg/L。在 10 μg/L 和 50 μg/L 两个不同浓度水平下,用相对标准偏差评估了该方法的精密度。黄瓜样品的实际分析结果表明该方法灵敏度高、样品净化效果好、重复性好、准确度高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
SEPARATION SCIENCE PLUS
SEPARATION SCIENCE PLUS CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL-
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
9.10%
发文量
111
期刊最新文献
Removal of Residual DNA and Host Cell Proteins for the Purification of Recombinant Staphylokinase Expressed in Escherichia coli Green Analytical Approach for HPLC Method Development for Quantification of Sorafenib and Its Pharmacopeia Impurities: LC–MS/MS Characterization and Toxicity Prediction of Stress Degradation Products A Cartridge Structure Facilitates Clinical Mass Spectrometry Pretreatment and Can be Integrated Into a High‐Throughput Instrument Comparison of Polysaccharide Profiles of Different Seaweeds Based on Ion Chromatography and Ultrahigh‐Performance Liquid Chromatography Quantification of Recycled Polypropylene Stabilizers for Quality Control by Liquid Chromatography–Tandem Mass Spectrometry Using Simple, Fast and Efficient Ultrasonic Extraction
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1