Exploring TEFL Research Methods Courses in Iran: A Path to Research Synthesis Pedagogy

Mohammad Amini Farsani, Mojtaba Asaie
{"title":"Exploring TEFL Research Methods Courses in Iran: A Path to Research Synthesis Pedagogy","authors":"Mohammad Amini Farsani, Mojtaba Asaie","doi":"10.46743/2160-3715/2024.5858","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There has been inadequate investigation of research pedagogy in applied linguistics, despite the significance of research reform in the field. As such, we examined the status of Teaching English as a Foreign Language (TEFL) research pedagogy in postgraduate classes in Iran. We described and evaluated 28 research methods (RM) courses in terms of objectives, content, and assessment in Iranian universities. We employed a qualitative content analysis of RM syllabi, utilizing a mixture of inductive and deductive coding. Our results revealed that among the Iranian research instructors whose syllabi we examined, there is a common approach to delivering research methods courses. Nonetheless, there is a noticeable misalignment between the objectives they report and how these objectives are put into practice, as reflected in the course content and assessment methods. Among the analyzed syllabi, one instructor approached the course through the lens of research synthesis pedagogy. While acknowledging the benefits of the prevailing instructional approach, we argue in favor of implementing research synthesis pedagogy as an evidence-based and complementary alternative to conventional research training approaches within TEFL. This synthesis-informed research pedagogy has the potential to nurture a research mindset among postgraduate students, subsequently enhancing the quality assurance of different methodological orientations, including quantitative, qualitative, and mixed-methods research.","PeriodicalId":256338,"journal":{"name":"The Qualitative Report","volume":"58 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Qualitative Report","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2024.5858","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

There has been inadequate investigation of research pedagogy in applied linguistics, despite the significance of research reform in the field. As such, we examined the status of Teaching English as a Foreign Language (TEFL) research pedagogy in postgraduate classes in Iran. We described and evaluated 28 research methods (RM) courses in terms of objectives, content, and assessment in Iranian universities. We employed a qualitative content analysis of RM syllabi, utilizing a mixture of inductive and deductive coding. Our results revealed that among the Iranian research instructors whose syllabi we examined, there is a common approach to delivering research methods courses. Nonetheless, there is a noticeable misalignment between the objectives they report and how these objectives are put into practice, as reflected in the course content and assessment methods. Among the analyzed syllabi, one instructor approached the course through the lens of research synthesis pedagogy. While acknowledging the benefits of the prevailing instructional approach, we argue in favor of implementing research synthesis pedagogy as an evidence-based and complementary alternative to conventional research training approaches within TEFL. This synthesis-informed research pedagogy has the potential to nurture a research mindset among postgraduate students, subsequently enhancing the quality assurance of different methodological orientations, including quantitative, qualitative, and mixed-methods research.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
探索伊朗的 TEFL 研究方法课程:研究综合教学法之路
尽管应用语言学领域的研究改革意义重大,但对该领域研究教学法的调查一直不足。因此,我们研究了伊朗研究生班中英语作为外语教学(TEFL)研究教学法的现状。我们从目标、内容和评估方面对伊朗大学的 28 门研究方法(RM)课程进行了描述和评估。我们对 RM 教学大纲进行了定性内容分析,混合使用了归纳和演绎编码。我们的研究结果表明,在我们所研究的伊朗研究指导教师的教学大纲中,有一种教授研究方法课程的共同方法。然而,他们所报告的目标与如何将这些目标付诸实践之间存在明显的不一致,这反映在课程内容和评估方法上。在所分析的教学大纲中,有一位教师通过研究综合教学法的视角来教授课程。在承认现行教学方法的优点的同时,我们主张实施研究综合教学法,将其作为 TEFL 传统研究培训方法的循证和补充性替代方法。这种以综合为基础的研究教学法有可能培养研究生的研究思维,从而提高不同方法论取向(包括定量、定性和混合方法研究)的质量保证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Self-Directed Learning in a Qualitative Research Methods Course for Doctoral Students Teaching Staff Mathematics University: Catalyst of the Emotional-Techno-Ontological Logic Navigating Credibility and Approachability in Conflict Zones: Insights from Fieldwork in Nigerian Communities Facing Eco-Violence Using Triangulation and Crystallization to Make Qualitative Studies Trustworthy and Rigorous Qualitative Study of Stakeholder Influence on Environmental Practices: Evidence from the Malaysian Aviation Industry
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1