Cancer patients admitted in the intensive care unit: Characteristics and outcomes

Petra Zieher , Márcia Eliane Giuliato , Luana Turra , Mariane Carolina de Almeida , Sara Fernanda Hilgert , Antuani Rafael Baptistella
{"title":"Cancer patients admitted in the intensive care unit: Characteristics and outcomes","authors":"Petra Zieher ,&nbsp;Márcia Eliane Giuliato ,&nbsp;Luana Turra ,&nbsp;Mariane Carolina de Almeida ,&nbsp;Sara Fernanda Hilgert ,&nbsp;Antuani Rafael Baptistella","doi":"10.1016/j.acci.2023.12.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>The aim of this study was to identify the profile of cancer patients admitted in the intensive care unit (ICU) and compares the outcomes with non-cancer patients hospitalized in the same period.</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>This is a cross-sectional study.</p></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><p>Data were collected from medical records at Hospital Universitário Santa Terezinha, Joaçaba-SC, Brazil.</p></div><div><h3>Patients</h3><p>Admitted at ICU from April to November 2018.</p></div><div><h3>Interventions</h3><p>NA.</p></div><div><h3>Main variables of interest</h3><p>ICU outcomes.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p><span>Of the 183 patients, 92 were cancer patients and 91 were non-cancer patients. There was a predominance of females for cancer and males for non-caner group, mostly elderly. Most hospitalizations of cancer patients were postoperative (49.4%). The cause of hospitalization of non-cancer patients was pneumonia, followed by traumatic brain injury, postoperative period, polytrauma, and septicemia. On the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) scale, cancer patients scored an average of 7.8 (±4.2) and on the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health </span>Disease Classification System (APACHE II) 13.3 points (±8.6), whereas non-cancer scored 7.6 (±3.55) and 20.9 points (±7.2), respectively. Non-cancer patients used more invasive mechanical ventilation and vasoactive drugs.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Cancer patients received less sedation and used less mechanical ventilation than non-cancer patients. In addition, cancer patients had a lower APACHE II score, denoting a less severe condition. Most surgical cancer patients demonstrate to benefit from intensive care, but it is still necessary to create more specific criteria for ICU admission.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100016,"journal":{"name":"Acta Colombiana de Cuidado Intensivo","volume":"24 2","pages":"Pages 86-91"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Colombiana de Cuidado Intensivo","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0122726223000903","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

The aim of this study was to identify the profile of cancer patients admitted in the intensive care unit (ICU) and compares the outcomes with non-cancer patients hospitalized in the same period.

Design

This is a cross-sectional study.

Setting

Data were collected from medical records at Hospital Universitário Santa Terezinha, Joaçaba-SC, Brazil.

Patients

Admitted at ICU from April to November 2018.

Interventions

NA.

Main variables of interest

ICU outcomes.

Results

Of the 183 patients, 92 were cancer patients and 91 were non-cancer patients. There was a predominance of females for cancer and males for non-caner group, mostly elderly. Most hospitalizations of cancer patients were postoperative (49.4%). The cause of hospitalization of non-cancer patients was pneumonia, followed by traumatic brain injury, postoperative period, polytrauma, and septicemia. On the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) scale, cancer patients scored an average of 7.8 (±4.2) and on the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Disease Classification System (APACHE II) 13.3 points (±8.6), whereas non-cancer scored 7.6 (±3.55) and 20.9 points (±7.2), respectively. Non-cancer patients used more invasive mechanical ventilation and vasoactive drugs.

Conclusion

Cancer patients received less sedation and used less mechanical ventilation than non-cancer patients. In addition, cancer patients had a lower APACHE II score, denoting a less severe condition. Most surgical cancer patients demonstrate to benefit from intensive care, but it is still necessary to create more specific criteria for ICU admission.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
入住重症监护室的癌症患者:特征和结果
目的本研究旨在确定重症监护室(ICU)收治的癌症患者的特征,并将其结果与同期住院的非癌症患者进行比较。结果在183名患者中,92人为癌症患者,91人为非癌症患者。癌症患者中女性居多,非癌症患者中男性居多,且多为老年人。癌症患者的住院原因多为术后(49.4%)。非癌症患者的住院原因是肺炎,其次是脑外伤、术后、多发性创伤和败血症。在序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)量表中,癌症患者的平均得分为 7.8 分(±4.2),急性生理学和慢性健康疾病分类系统(APACHE II)的平均得分为 13.3 分(±8.6),而非癌症患者的平均得分分别为 7.6 分(±3.55)和 20.9 分(±7.2)。结论与非癌症患者相比,癌症患者接受的镇静剂和使用的机械通气较少。此外,癌症患者的 APACHE II 评分较低,说明病情较轻。大多数手术癌症患者都能从重症监护中获益,但仍有必要为入住重症监护病房制定更具体的标准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Sepsis and septic shock associated with tuberculosis “Landouzy's tifobacilosis”: A dark and unpredictable enemy – From pathophysiology to clinical implications Síndrome de Guillain-Barré asociado a cirugía de revascularización coronaria. Reporte de caso Valoración de dos biomarcadores inmunológicos en sepsis bacteriana y shock séptico Agua extravascular pulmonar como predictor de SDRA y mortalidad en pacientes con choque circulatorio Hidroxietil-almidón como líquido de reemplazo en aféresis terapéutica: experiencia en una unidad de cuidados intensivos
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1