Identification of carbonate sedimentary facies from well logs with machine learning

Q1 Earth and Planetary Sciences Petroleum Research Pub Date : 2024-06-01 DOI:10.1016/j.ptlrs.2024.01.007
Xianmu Hou , Peiqing Lian , Jiuyu Zhao , Yun Zai , Weiyao Zhu , Fuyong Wang
{"title":"Identification of carbonate sedimentary facies from well logs with machine learning","authors":"Xianmu Hou ,&nbsp;Peiqing Lian ,&nbsp;Jiuyu Zhao ,&nbsp;Yun Zai ,&nbsp;Weiyao Zhu ,&nbsp;Fuyong Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.ptlrs.2024.01.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Sedimentary facies identification is critical for carbonate oil and gas reservoir development. The traditional method of sedimentary facies identification not only be affected by the engineer's experience but also takes a long time. Identifying carbonate sedimentary facies based on machine learning is the trend of future development and has the advantages of short time consuming and reliable results without engineers' subjective influence. Although many references reported the application of machine learning to identify lithofacies, but identifying sedimentary facies of carbonate reservoirs is much more challenging due to the complex sedimentary environment and tectonic movement. This paper compares the performance of the carbonate sedimentary facies identification using four different machine learning models, and the optimal machine learning with the highest prediction accuracy is recommended. First, the carbonate sedimentary facies are classified into the lagoon, shallow sea, shoal, fore-shoal, and inter-shoal five tags based on the well loggings. Then, five well log curves including spectral gamma ray (SGR), uranium-free gamma ray (CGR), photoelectric absorption cross-section index (PE), true formation resistivity (RT), shallow lateral resistivity (RS) are used as the input, and the manual identified carbonate sedimentary facies are used as the output of the machine learning model. The performance of four different machine learning algorithms, including support vector machine (SVM), deep neural network (<span>DNN</span>), long short-term memory (<span>LSTM</span>) network, and random forest (RF) are compared. The other two wells are used for model validation. The research results show that the RF method has the highest accuracy of sedimentary facies prediction, and the average prediction accuracy is 78.81%; the average accuracy of sedimentary facies prediction using SVM is 77.93%. The sedimentary facies predictions using DNN and LSTM are less satisfying compared with RF and SVM, and the average accuracy is 69.94% and 73.05%, respectively. The predicted carbonate sedimentary facies by LSTM are more continuous compared with other machine learning models. This study is helpful for identifying compelx sedimentary facies of carbonate reservoirs from well logs.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":19756,"journal":{"name":"Petroleum Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2096249524000073/pdfft?md5=4ecc1f769bf586c8fbae3c73c4a35aa9&pid=1-s2.0-S2096249524000073-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Petroleum Research","FirstCategoryId":"1087","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2096249524000073","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Sedimentary facies identification is critical for carbonate oil and gas reservoir development. The traditional method of sedimentary facies identification not only be affected by the engineer's experience but also takes a long time. Identifying carbonate sedimentary facies based on machine learning is the trend of future development and has the advantages of short time consuming and reliable results without engineers' subjective influence. Although many references reported the application of machine learning to identify lithofacies, but identifying sedimentary facies of carbonate reservoirs is much more challenging due to the complex sedimentary environment and tectonic movement. This paper compares the performance of the carbonate sedimentary facies identification using four different machine learning models, and the optimal machine learning with the highest prediction accuracy is recommended. First, the carbonate sedimentary facies are classified into the lagoon, shallow sea, shoal, fore-shoal, and inter-shoal five tags based on the well loggings. Then, five well log curves including spectral gamma ray (SGR), uranium-free gamma ray (CGR), photoelectric absorption cross-section index (PE), true formation resistivity (RT), shallow lateral resistivity (RS) are used as the input, and the manual identified carbonate sedimentary facies are used as the output of the machine learning model. The performance of four different machine learning algorithms, including support vector machine (SVM), deep neural network (DNN), long short-term memory (LSTM) network, and random forest (RF) are compared. The other two wells are used for model validation. The research results show that the RF method has the highest accuracy of sedimentary facies prediction, and the average prediction accuracy is 78.81%; the average accuracy of sedimentary facies prediction using SVM is 77.93%. The sedimentary facies predictions using DNN and LSTM are less satisfying compared with RF and SVM, and the average accuracy is 69.94% and 73.05%, respectively. The predicted carbonate sedimentary facies by LSTM are more continuous compared with other machine learning models. This study is helpful for identifying compelx sedimentary facies of carbonate reservoirs from well logs.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用机器学习从测井记录中识别碳酸盐沉积层面
沉积面识别对于碳酸盐岩油气藏开发至关重要。传统的沉积面识别方法不仅受工程师经验的影响,而且耗时较长。基于机器学习的碳酸盐岩沉积面识别是未来发展的趋势,具有耗时短、结果可靠、不受工程师主观影响等优点。虽然很多文献报道了应用机器学习识别岩性的方法,但由于碳酸盐岩储层复杂的沉积环境和构造运动,识别碳酸盐岩储层的沉积面更具挑战性。本文比较了使用四种不同机器学习模型识别碳酸盐岩沉积面的性能,并推荐了预测精度最高的最优机器学习。首先,根据测井结果将碳酸盐沉积面分为泻湖、浅海、滩涂、前滩和滩间五个标签。然后,将光谱伽马射线(SGR)、无铀伽马射线(CGR)、光电吸收截面指数(PE)、真地层电阻率(RT)、浅侧向电阻率(RS)等五条测井曲线作为输入,将人工识别的碳酸盐沉积面作为机器学习模型的输出。比较了四种不同机器学习算法的性能,包括支持向量机(SVM)、深度神经网络(DNN)、长短期记忆(LSTM)网络和随机森林(RF)。其他两个井用于模型验证。研究结果表明,RF 方法的沉积面预测准确率最高,平均预测准确率为 78.81%;使用 SVM 预测沉积面的平均准确率为 77.93%。使用 DNN 和 LSTM 预测沉积面的结果不如 RF 和 SVM 那么令人满意,平均准确率分别为 69.94% 和 73.05%。与其他机器学习模型相比,LSTM 预测的碳酸盐岩沉积面更具连续性。该研究有助于从测井资料中识别碳酸盐岩储层的强迫沉积面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Petroleum Research
Petroleum Research Earth and Planetary Sciences-Geology
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
90
审稿时长
35 weeks
期刊最新文献
Wettability modification effects on relative permeability end-points: Comparative analysis of surfactant agents for enhanced oil recovery Impact of interfacial tension on oil-water flow in a narrow gap Pore-scale study of the effects of DTPA chelating agent flooding on oil recovery utilizing a clay-coated micromodel Protection of steel hooks embedded in glass-fiber-reinforced concrete against macrocell corrosion Advancing sandstone reservoir compressibility prediction: A correlation-driven methodology
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1