Methods for SARS-CoV-2 hospital disinfection, in vitro observations

IF 1.9 Q3 INFECTIOUS DISEASES Infection Prevention in Practice Pub Date : 2024-01-12 DOI:10.1016/j.infpip.2024.100339
Dora E. Corzo-Leon , Hadeel Mohammed Abbood , Rosa A. Colamarino , Markus F.C. Steiner , Carol Munro , Ian M. Gould , Karolin Hijazi
{"title":"Methods for SARS-CoV-2 hospital disinfection, in vitro observations","authors":"Dora E. Corzo-Leon ,&nbsp;Hadeel Mohammed Abbood ,&nbsp;Rosa A. Colamarino ,&nbsp;Markus F.C. Steiner ,&nbsp;Carol Munro ,&nbsp;Ian M. Gould ,&nbsp;Karolin Hijazi","doi":"10.1016/j.infpip.2024.100339","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Escalation of chemical disinfection during the COVID-19 pandemic has raised occupational hazard concerns. Alternative and potentially safer methods such as ultraviolet-C (UVC) irradiation and ozone have been proposed, notwithstanding the lack of standardized criteria for their use in the healthcare environment.</p></div><div><h3>Aim</h3><p>Compare the virucidal activity of 70% ethanol, sodium dichloroisocyanurate (NaDCC), chlorhexidine, ozonated water, UVC-222 nm, UVC-254 nm against three SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern cultured <em>in vitro</em>.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Inactivation of three SARS-CoV-2 variants (alpha, beta, gamma) by the following chemical methods was tested: ethanol 70%, NaDCC (100 ppm, 500 ppm, 1000 ppm), chlorhexidine (2%, 1% and 0.5%), ozonated water 7 ppm. For irradiation, a je2Care 222nm UVC Lamp was compared to a Sylvania G15 UV254 nm lamp.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Viral inactivation by &gt;3 log was achieved with ethanol, NaDCC and chlorhexidine. The minor virucidal effect of ozonated water was &lt;1 log. Virus treatment with UVC-254 nm reduced viral activity by 1–5 logs with higher inactivation after exposure for 3 minutes compared to 6 seconds. For all three variants, under equivalent conditions, exposure to UVC-222 nm did not achieve time-dependent inactivation as was observed with treatment with UVC-254 nm.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The virucidal activity on replication-competent SARS-CoV-2 by conventional chemical methods, including chlorhexidine at concentrations as low as 0.5%, was not matched by UVC irradiation, and to an even lesser extent by ozonated water treatment.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":33492,"journal":{"name":"Infection Prevention in Practice","volume":"6 1","pages":"Article 100339"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590088924000039/pdfft?md5=1ea058ce00977f63f2f5aa090475c0c5&pid=1-s2.0-S2590088924000039-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Infection Prevention in Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590088924000039","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Escalation of chemical disinfection during the COVID-19 pandemic has raised occupational hazard concerns. Alternative and potentially safer methods such as ultraviolet-C (UVC) irradiation and ozone have been proposed, notwithstanding the lack of standardized criteria for their use in the healthcare environment.

Aim

Compare the virucidal activity of 70% ethanol, sodium dichloroisocyanurate (NaDCC), chlorhexidine, ozonated water, UVC-222 nm, UVC-254 nm against three SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern cultured in vitro.

Methods

Inactivation of three SARS-CoV-2 variants (alpha, beta, gamma) by the following chemical methods was tested: ethanol 70%, NaDCC (100 ppm, 500 ppm, 1000 ppm), chlorhexidine (2%, 1% and 0.5%), ozonated water 7 ppm. For irradiation, a je2Care 222nm UVC Lamp was compared to a Sylvania G15 UV254 nm lamp.

Results

Viral inactivation by >3 log was achieved with ethanol, NaDCC and chlorhexidine. The minor virucidal effect of ozonated water was <1 log. Virus treatment with UVC-254 nm reduced viral activity by 1–5 logs with higher inactivation after exposure for 3 minutes compared to 6 seconds. For all three variants, under equivalent conditions, exposure to UVC-222 nm did not achieve time-dependent inactivation as was observed with treatment with UVC-254 nm.

Conclusion

The virucidal activity on replication-competent SARS-CoV-2 by conventional chemical methods, including chlorhexidine at concentrations as low as 0.5%, was not matched by UVC irradiation, and to an even lesser extent by ozonated water treatment.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
SARS-CoV-2 医院消毒方法,体外观察
导言在 COVID-19 大流行期间,化学消毒的减少引起了人们对职业危害的担忧。目的比较 70% 乙醇、二氯异氰尿酸钠 (NaDCC)、洗必泰、臭氧水、UVC-222 纳米和 UVC-254 纳米对体外培养的三种 SARS-CoV-2 变异株的杀病毒活性。方法测试了以下化学方法对三种 SARS-CoV-2 变体(α、β、γ)的灭活作用:70% 乙醇、NaDCC(100 ppm、500 ppm、1000 ppm)、洗必泰(2%、1% 和 0.5%)、臭氧水 7 ppm。在照射方面,将 je2Care 222nm 紫外线灯与 Sylvania G15 UV254nm 灯进行了比较。臭氧水的杀毒效果为 1 log。用波长为 254 纳米的紫外线处理病毒可使病毒活性降低 1-5 个对数,与 6 秒钟相比,暴露 3 分钟后的灭活率更高。对于所有三种变体,在同等条件下,紫外线-222 纳米照射不能达到与紫外线-254 纳米处理相同的随时间变化的灭活效果。结论:传统化学方法(包括浓度低至 0.5%的洗必泰)对复制能力强的 SARS-CoV-2 的杀病毒活性无法与紫外线照射相媲美,臭氧水处理的效果甚至更差。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Infection Prevention in Practice
Infection Prevention in Practice Medicine-Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
58
审稿时长
61 days
期刊最新文献
Application of the Blood Culture Train model based on procedural and behavioural interventions to improve the quality of blood culture collection Evaluation of the efficacy of the automatic ozone decontamination device in a real-life setting of an intravitreal injection room
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1