Panton-Valentine leukocidin (PVL)-negative, sequence type 1-staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec (SCCmec) type IV (ST1-IV) methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is prevalent in Japanese hospitals. The PVL-negative ST1-IV MRSA strain is known as USA400/J in Japan. In this study, we analysed an MRSA outbreak at a Japanese university hospital using conventional methods, SCCmec typing, pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) and whole-genome sequencing (WGS).
Methods
We analysed 12 MRSA strains isolated from the neonatal intensive care unit of Aichi Medical University Hospital. SCCmec typing and gene detection were performed using polymerase chain reaction. Molecular epidemiological analyses were performed using multi-locus sequence typing and PFGE. Genome-based phylogenetic analyses were performed for some strains.
Results
The isolated MRSA strains were classified as ST1-IV (N = 4), ST8-IV (N = 1), ST764-II (N = 6) and ST89-V (N = 1). PFGE analysis showed that the ST1-IV and ST764-II strains exhibited high homology within their clones. Phylogenetic analysis based on the genomes of the USA400/J strains isolated in this study and ST1-IV isolates from overseas showed that clonal complex 1-SCCmec type IV (CC1-IV) strains isolated in Japan formed a unique cluster that was distinct from the ST1-IV strains from overseas. This suggests that CC1-IV evolved and spread independently in Japan.
Conclusion
These findings highlight the need for increased surveillance and infection control measures that specifically target USA400/J.
{"title":"Whole-genome sequencing reveals a unique outbreak of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus clone USA400/J in Japan","authors":"Takuma Yoshida , Yuka Yamagishi , Hiroshi Kaneko , Shunsuke Takadama , Hiroshige Mikamo , Hidemasa Nakaminami","doi":"10.1016/j.infpip.2025.100506","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.infpip.2025.100506","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>Panton-Valentine leukocidin (PVL)-negative, sequence type 1-staphylococcal cassette chromosome <em>mec</em> (SCC<em>mec</em>) type IV (ST1-IV) methicillin-resistant <em>Staphylococcus aureus</em> (MRSA) is prevalent in Japanese hospitals. The PVL-negative ST1-IV MRSA strain is known as USA400/J in Japan. In this study, we analysed an MRSA outbreak at a Japanese university hospital using conventional methods, SCC<em>mec</em> typing, pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) and whole-genome sequencing (WGS).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We analysed 12 MRSA strains isolated from the neonatal intensive care unit of Aichi Medical University Hospital. SCC<em>mec</em> typing and gene detection were performed using polymerase chain reaction. Molecular epidemiological analyses were performed using multi-locus sequence typing and PFGE. Genome-based phylogenetic analyses were performed for some strains.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The isolated MRSA strains were classified as ST1-IV (<em>N</em> = 4), ST8-IV (<em>N</em> = 1), ST764-II (<em>N</em> = 6) and ST89-V (<em>N</em> = 1). PFGE analysis showed that the ST1-IV and ST764-II strains exhibited high homology within their clones. Phylogenetic analysis based on the genomes of the USA400/J strains isolated in this study and ST1-IV isolates from overseas showed that clonal complex 1-SCC<em>mec</em> type IV (CC1-IV) strains isolated in Japan formed a unique cluster that was distinct from the ST1-IV strains from overseas. This suggests that CC1-IV evolved and spread independently in Japan.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>These findings highlight the need for increased surveillance and infection control measures that specifically target USA400/J.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":33492,"journal":{"name":"Infection Prevention in Practice","volume":"8 1","pages":"Article 100506"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2025-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146037176","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Healthcare-associated infections (HAIs) acquired in intensive care units (ICUs) represent a major burden of morbidity and mortality worldwide. However, national data in Hungary are limited, and few studies compare local findings with national and international surveillance systems.
Methods
We conducted a retrospective longitudinal study involving 1002 patients admitted to ICUs between 1st May 2023 and 30th April 2024. We analysed the prevalence, types and distribution of pathogens responsible for HAIs. Data were compared with national reports from the Hungarian National Nosocomial Surveillance System and international reports from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control.
Results
The overall prevalence of HAIs was 16.9% (169/1002 patients). The most frequent infection types were lower respiratory tract infections (9.2%), ventilator-associated pneumonia (4.3%), urinary tract infections (UTIs, 3.8%) and Clostridioides difficile infections (2.5%). All UTIs identified during the study period were catheter-associated urinary tract infection, attributable to the high device utilisation rate in the ICU, where all patients had an indwelling urinary catheter during their stay. The leading pathogens were Pseudomonas aeruginosa (23.7%), Clostridioides difficile (13.0%), Klebsiella pneumoniae (13.0%), Enterococcus faecalis (11.6%) and Escherichia coli (5.8%). Overall, 30.9% (64/207) of isolates were multi-drug resistant (MDR).
Conclusion
Our study highlighted the considerable prevalence of HAIs and the dominance of MDR Gram-negative bacteria. Comparison with international data helps identify areas requiring targeted infection control measures.
{"title":"One-year epidemiological analysis of nosocomial infections and antimicrobial resistance in a Hungarian intensive care unit","authors":"Agnes Csörnyei-Kelemen , Laszlo Marcell Repasi , Janos Leszkoven , Viktor Misak , Zoltan Balogh","doi":"10.1016/j.infpip.2025.100505","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.infpip.2025.100505","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Healthcare-associated infections (HAIs) acquired in intensive care units (ICUs) represent a major burden of morbidity and mortality worldwide. However, national data in Hungary are limited, and few studies compare local findings with national and international surveillance systems.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We conducted a retrospective longitudinal study involving 1002 patients admitted to ICUs between 1<sup>st</sup> May 2023 and 30<sup>th</sup> April 2024. We analysed the prevalence, types and distribution of pathogens responsible for HAIs. Data were compared with national reports from the Hungarian National Nosocomial Surveillance System and international reports from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The overall prevalence of HAIs was 16.9% (169/1002 patients). The most frequent infection types were lower respiratory tract infections (9.2%), ventilator-associated pneumonia (4.3%), urinary tract infections (UTIs, 3.8%) and <em>Clostridioides difficile</em> infections (2.5%). All UTIs identified during the study period were catheter-associated urinary tract infection, attributable to the high device utilisation rate in the ICU, where all patients had an indwelling urinary catheter during their stay. The leading pathogens were <em>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</em> (23.7%), <em>Clostridioides difficile</em> (13.0%), <em>Klebsiella pneumoniae</em> (13.0%), <em>Enterococcus faecalis</em> (11.6%) and <em>Escherichia coli</em> (5.8%). Overall, 30.9% (64/207) of isolates were multi-drug resistant (MDR).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Our study highlighted the considerable prevalence of HAIs and the dominance of MDR Gram-negative bacteria. Comparison with international data helps identify areas requiring targeted infection control measures.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":33492,"journal":{"name":"Infection Prevention in Practice","volume":"8 1","pages":"Article 100505"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2025-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146037181","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-01DOI: 10.1016/j.infpip.2025.100486
Alexandra Peters , Martina Mocenic , Pierre Parneix , Brett G. Mitchell , Stephanie Dancer , David J. Weber
{"title":"Clean Hospitals Day 2025: The human factors of healthcare environmental hygiene","authors":"Alexandra Peters , Martina Mocenic , Pierre Parneix , Brett G. Mitchell , Stephanie Dancer , David J. Weber","doi":"10.1016/j.infpip.2025.100486","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.infpip.2025.100486","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":33492,"journal":{"name":"Infection Prevention in Practice","volume":"7 4","pages":"Article 100486"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145614398","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-11-24DOI: 10.1016/j.infpip.2025.100501
Hanna-Leena Melender , Elina Koota , Katariina Kainulainen , Karoliina Aho , Marja Mäkinen , Johanna Kaartinen
Background
Patient education regarding hand hygiene (HH) and the correct use of non-sterile clinical gloves (NSCGs) are important parts of infection prevention and control. Unnecessary use of NSCGs can be harmful, has associated financial costs, and harms the environment. This study aimed to explore healthcare workers' (HCWs) adherence to patient education regarding HH and the correct use of NSCGs in an observation unit.
Methods
Data in this observational descriptive cross-sectional study were collected from patients using a questionnaire. The questionnaire asked about the patient education received and the use of NSCGs by HCWs. The correctness of NSCG use was determined by the investigators based on standard precautions on infection prevention and control. Statistical analysis and qualitative content analysis were performed.
Results
The convenience sample consisted of 174 patients in an observation unit at Helsinki University Hospital, and 600 care, examination or test procedures conducted for patients. The response rate was 87%. Of the participating patients, 8.6% reported that they had received patient education on HH. Eighteen different procedures were conducted for the study patients. The use of NSCGs was always correct for six procedures. Unnecessary use of NSCGs was found (to varying degrees) for nine procedures, and insufficient use of NSCGs was found for three procedures. An association was found between a procedure/procedure type conducted for a patient and the correct use of NSCGs (P<0.001).
Conclusions
Deviations from the standard precautions existed. Interventions for HCWs are needed to support routine patient education on HH and evidence-based use of NSCGs.
{"title":"Patient-reported education regarding hand hygiene and use of non-sterile clinical gloves in an emergency department observation unit","authors":"Hanna-Leena Melender , Elina Koota , Katariina Kainulainen , Karoliina Aho , Marja Mäkinen , Johanna Kaartinen","doi":"10.1016/j.infpip.2025.100501","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.infpip.2025.100501","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Patient education regarding hand hygiene (HH) and the correct use of non-sterile clinical gloves (NSCGs) are important parts of infection prevention and control. Unnecessary use of NSCGs can be harmful, has associated financial costs, and harms the environment. This study aimed to explore healthcare workers' (HCWs) adherence to patient education regarding HH and the correct use of NSCGs in an observation unit.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Data in this observational descriptive cross-sectional study were collected from patients using a questionnaire. The questionnaire asked about the patient education received and the use of NSCGs by HCWs. The correctness of NSCG use was determined by the investigators based on standard precautions on infection prevention and control. Statistical analysis and qualitative content analysis were performed.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The convenience sample consisted of 174 patients in an observation unit at Helsinki University Hospital, and 600 care, examination or test procedures conducted for patients. The response rate was 87%. Of the participating patients, 8.6% reported that they had received patient education on HH. Eighteen different procedures were conducted for the study patients. The use of NSCGs was always correct for six procedures. Unnecessary use of NSCGs was found (to varying degrees) for nine procedures, and insufficient use of NSCGs was found for three procedures. An association was found between a procedure/procedure type conducted for a patient and the correct use of NSCGs (<em>P</em><0.001).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Deviations from the standard precautions existed. Interventions for HCWs are needed to support routine patient education on HH and evidence-based use of NSCGs.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":33492,"journal":{"name":"Infection Prevention in Practice","volume":"8 1","pages":"Article 100501"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2025-11-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146037177","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Carbapenems are vital for treating Enterobacterales infections. However, the emergence of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE), mediated by carbapen-emases or otherwise, has become a global concern due to increased morbidity and mortality. In Japan, metallo-β-lactamase was found to be the predominant carbapenemase, notably imipenemase. Both carbapenem-susceptible and carbapenem-resistant strains of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales exist, which complicates the identification of carbapenemase production through susceptibility testing alone. Infection control measures, such as contact precautions and antimicrobial stewardship, are recommended to combat resistant strains. Since carbapenem use is a risk factor for resistance, reducing its consumption is a key strategy for resistance management.
Aim
To elucidate the impact of antimicrobial use on CRE detection rates and antimicrobial resistance trends and to propose a risk assessment framework for antimicrobial resistance surveillance.
Methods
We analysed the relationship between antimicrobial use density (AUD), days of therapy (DOT) and CRE detection among inpatients at Toho University Omori Medical Centre between 2014 and 2022.
Results
Overall, AUD and DOT increased, notably for piperacillin/tazobactam (TZP), cefmetazole, ceftriaxone (CRO) and cefepime. Conversely, AUD and DOT for flomoxef, cefoperazone/sulbactam, cefozopran, ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin, doripenem, aztreonam and fosfomycin decreased. AUD of meropenem (MEM) increased, but its overall proportion decreased. TZP and CRO correlated with resistance rates, while MEM did not. Carbapenemase-producing carbapenem-non-susceptible Enterobacterales (CP-CNSE) detection was associated with TZP usage, and non-carbapenemase-producing (NCP)-CNSE detection correlated with overall AUD, TZP, and CRO use.
Conclusion
Reducing TZP and cephalosporin usage, in addition to carbapenems, is crucial for preventing resistant strains.
{"title":"Association between antimicrobial use and the detection rates of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales: long-term surveillance results from a single centre","authors":"Shinobu Hirayama , Mariko Otani , Hinako Murakami , Maki Sakamoto , Kazuhiro Tateda , Takahiro Matsumoto , Takashi Sugita","doi":"10.1016/j.infpip.2025.100500","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.infpip.2025.100500","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Carbapenems are vital for treating Enterobacterales infections. However, the emergence of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE), mediated by carbapen-emases or otherwise, has become a global concern due to increased morbidity and mortality. In Japan, metallo-β-lactamase was found to be the predominant carbapenemase, notably imipenemase. Both carbapenem-susceptible and carbapenem-resistant strains of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales exist, which complicates the identification of carbapenemase production through susceptibility testing alone. Infection control measures, such as contact precautions and antimicrobial stewardship, are recommended to combat resistant strains. Since carbapenem use is a risk factor for resistance, reducing its consumption is a key strategy for resistance management.</div></div><div><h3>Aim</h3><div>To elucidate the impact of antimicrobial use on CRE detection rates and antimicrobial resistance trends and to propose a risk assessment framework for antimicrobial resistance surveillance.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We analysed the relationship between antimicrobial use density (AUD), days of therapy (DOT) and CRE detection among inpatients at Toho University Omori Medical Centre between 2014 and 2022.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Overall, AUD and DOT increased, notably for piperacillin/tazobactam (TZP), cefmetazole, ceftriaxone (CRO) and cefepime. Conversely, AUD and DOT for flomoxef, cefoperazone/sulbactam, cefozopran, ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin, doripenem, aztreonam and fosfomycin decreased. AUD of meropenem (MEM) increased, but its overall proportion decreased. TZP and CRO correlated with resistance rates, while MEM did not. Carbapenemase-producing carbapenem-non-susceptible Enterobacterales (CP-CNSE) detection was associated with TZP usage, and non-carbapenemase-producing (NCP)-CNSE detection correlated with overall AUD, TZP, and CRO use.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Reducing TZP and cephalosporin usage, in addition to carbapenems, is crucial for preventing resistant strains.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":33492,"journal":{"name":"Infection Prevention in Practice","volume":"8 1","pages":"Article 100500"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2025-11-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145977040","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-11-21DOI: 10.1016/j.infpip.2025.100499
S. Ali , G. Macori , N. Mullane , B. Jayaseelan , O. Donoghue , S. Fanning , K. Schaffer
Klebsiella pneumoniae is a major cause of healthcare-associated infections. Although colonisation with Gram-negative bacteria in hospitalised patients is well recognised, the relative contributions of patient-to-patient versus environment-to-patient transmission remain unclear. Most outbreak investigations focus on multi-drug-resistant (MDR) strains. This study investigates a non-MDR K. pneumoniae outbreak in an intensive care unit (ICU) to examine the role of the hospital environment in nosocomial transmission. Clinical isolates of Klebsiella spp. were obtained from six patients between January 2021 and June 2021. Environmental swabs were collected from handwashing sinks in patient and preparation rooms, 3 months apart. Whole-genome sequencing (WGS) assessed singlenucleotide polymorphism (SNP)-based relatedness using literature-informed thresholds. WGS identified five distinct clusters of genetically related K. pneumoniae isolates, linking clinical and environmental sources. The closest relationships (2—5 SNPs) were observed between patient and sink isolates within the same room, consistent with recent transmission or a shared source. Additional clusters (5—23 SNPs) involved isolates from sinks in different rooms, indicating environmental persistence and potential inter-room dissemination. Two Klebsiella varicola subspecies variicola bloodstream isolates from spatially distinct patients differed by only 2 SNPs, forming an additional cluster consistent with a common clonal lineage. Following enhanced daily sink disinfection and staff education, no further clinical acquisitions were identified. WGS demonstrated genetic relatedness between nonMDR Klebsiella spp. strains and ICU environmental isolates, underscoring the role of environmental reservoirs in transmitting antimicrobial-susceptible Gram-negative organisms and the importance of targeted surveillance beyond MDR settings.
{"title":"Are hospital environments an underestimated source for Gram-negative infections in critically ill patients? A non-multi-drug-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae outbreak in an Irish intensive care unit","authors":"S. Ali , G. Macori , N. Mullane , B. Jayaseelan , O. Donoghue , S. Fanning , K. Schaffer","doi":"10.1016/j.infpip.2025.100499","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.infpip.2025.100499","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div><em>Klebsiella pneumoniae</em> is a major cause of healthcare-associated infections. Although colonisation with Gram-negative bacteria in hospitalised patients is well recognised, the relative contributions of patient-to-patient versus environment-to-patient transmission remain unclear. Most outbreak investigations focus on multi-drug-resistant (MDR) strains. This study investigates a non-MDR <em>K. pneumoniae</em> outbreak in an intensive care unit (ICU) to examine the role of the hospital environment in nosocomial transmission. Clinical isolates of Klebsiella spp. were obtained from six patients between January 2021 and June 2021. Environmental swabs were collected from handwashing sinks in patient and preparation rooms, 3 months apart. Whole-genome sequencing (WGS) assessed singlenucleotide polymorphism (SNP)-based relatedness using literature-informed thresholds. WGS identified five distinct clusters of genetically related K. pneumoniae isolates, linking clinical and environmental sources. The closest relationships (2—5 SNPs) were observed between patient and sink isolates within the same room, consistent with recent transmission or a shared source. Additional clusters (5—23 SNPs) involved isolates from sinks in different rooms, indicating environmental persistence and potential inter-room dissemination. Two <em>Klebsiella varicola</em> subspecies variicola bloodstream isolates from spatially distinct patients differed by only 2 SNPs, forming an additional cluster consistent with a common clonal lineage. Following enhanced daily sink disinfection and staff education, no further clinical acquisitions were identified. WGS demonstrated genetic relatedness between nonMDR Klebsiella spp. strains and ICU environmental isolates, underscoring the role of environmental reservoirs in transmitting antimicrobial-susceptible Gram-negative organisms and the importance of targeted surveillance beyond MDR settings.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":33492,"journal":{"name":"Infection Prevention in Practice","volume":"8 1","pages":"Article 100499"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2025-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145938368","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-11-17DOI: 10.1016/j.infpip.2025.100496
Simon Ching Lam , Jing Jing Su , Shun Wa Tsang , Anna On Na Wong , Vivian Ching Man Pang , Jessie Yuk Seng Chung , Shun Chan , Rick Yiu Cho Kwan , Lorna Kwai Ping Suen
Reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) testing has been regarded as the gold standard for the diagnosis of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). In response to the sudden surge in cases that overwhelmed the healthcare system in Hong Kong, several point-of-care testing (POCT) methods have been developed for rapid COVID-19 screening. However, the diagnostic accuracy of these methods remains inadequately established.
COVID-19–positive patients and negative control subjects were recruited from a community isolation centre and individuals under home quarantine. Four nasal swab samples were collected by trained operators from each subject. Three swab samples were immediately tested using conventional COVID-19 rapid antigen test (RAT), fluorescence-based RAT (Fluorescent-RAT) and POCT quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR). The fourth swab sample was submitted to a certified laboratory for standard RT-PCR analysis. The sensitivity and specificity of the three rapid testing methods were evaluated against the results obtained from the certified laboratory-based RT-PCR, which served as the reference standard.
The performance of the three diagnostic methods was assessed in 186 valid cases, which comprised 86 RT-PCR–confirmed positive cases and 100 negative cases. The participants' age ranged from 3 years to 94 years. The sensitivity of the Fluorescent-RAT (87.21%, 95% confidence interval [CI]:80.15%–94.27%) and the POCT qPCR (84.27%, 95% CI:76.71%–91.83%) was comparable and significantly higher than that of the conventional RAT (51.69%, 95% CI:41.30%–62.07%). All three methods demonstrated high specificity. The RAT and POCT qPCR exhibited 100% specificity (95% CI:100%), and the Fluorescent-RAT showed a specificity of 97.06% (95% CI:93.78%–100%).
This study demonstrated that the Fluorescent-RAT and POCT qPCR can serve as reliable alternatives to RT-PCR for COVID-19 diagnosis, offering improved performance compared with the conventional RAT.
{"title":"Diagnostic accuracy of point-of-care testing methods for SARS-CoV-2 detection in community quarantine and isolation settings","authors":"Simon Ching Lam , Jing Jing Su , Shun Wa Tsang , Anna On Na Wong , Vivian Ching Man Pang , Jessie Yuk Seng Chung , Shun Chan , Rick Yiu Cho Kwan , Lorna Kwai Ping Suen","doi":"10.1016/j.infpip.2025.100496","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.infpip.2025.100496","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) testing has been regarded as the gold standard for the diagnosis of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). In response to the sudden surge in cases that overwhelmed the healthcare system in Hong Kong, several point-of-care testing (POCT) methods have been developed for rapid COVID-19 screening. However, the diagnostic accuracy of these methods remains inadequately established.</div><div>COVID-19–positive patients and negative control subjects were recruited from a community isolation centre and individuals under home quarantine. Four nasal swab samples were collected by trained operators from each subject. Three swab samples were immediately tested using conventional COVID-19 rapid antigen test (RAT), fluorescence-based RAT (Fluorescent-RAT) and POCT quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR). The fourth swab sample was submitted to a certified laboratory for standard RT-PCR analysis. The sensitivity and specificity of the three rapid testing methods were evaluated against the results obtained from the certified laboratory-based RT-PCR, which served as the reference standard.</div><div>The performance of the three diagnostic methods was assessed in 186 valid cases, which comprised 86 RT-PCR–confirmed positive cases and 100 negative cases. The participants' age ranged from 3 years to 94 years. The sensitivity of the Fluorescent-RAT (87.21%, 95% confidence interval [CI]:80.15%–94.27%) and the POCT qPCR (84.27%, 95% CI:76.71%–91.83%) was comparable and significantly higher than that of the conventional RAT (51.69%, 95% CI:41.30%–62.07%). All three methods demonstrated high specificity. The RAT and POCT qPCR exhibited 100% specificity (95% CI:100%), and the Fluorescent-RAT showed a specificity of 97.06% (95% CI:93.78%–100%).</div><div>This study demonstrated that the Fluorescent-RAT and POCT qPCR can serve as reliable alternatives to RT-PCR for COVID-19 diagnosis, offering improved performance compared with the conventional RAT.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":33492,"journal":{"name":"Infection Prevention in Practice","volume":"8 1","pages":"Article 100496"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2025-11-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145691256","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-11-13DOI: 10.1016/j.infpip.2025.100498
L. Amminou, H. Soualem, S. Boukssim, S. Chbicheb
Objective
Blood exposure accidents (BEAs) are a major occupational hazard for dental students. Limited data exist on their prevalence and risk factors in Morocco.
Methods
A cross-sectional survey was conducted among 236 clinical-year dental students (4th–6th year) at the Faculty of Dental Medicine, Rabat. A structured, self-administered questionnaire assessed demographics, BEA history, and clinical practices. Chi-square tests and multivariable logistic regression identified independent risk factors.
Results
45.3% of participants reported at least one BEA, primarily from sharp instrument injuries (55.1%) or splashes onto mucous membranes (25.2%). Multivariate analysis showed that male gender was independently associated with higher risk (∼3.3×), with female students having lower odds of BEA (OR = 0.3, 95% CI: 0.18–0.86). Advanced academic year significantly increased risk (5th year: OR = 2.7, 95% CI: 1.2–6.2; 6th year: OR = 7.0, 95% CI: 3.1–15.3), while absence of procedural assistance also increased risk (OR = 0.1, 95% CI: 0.05–0.43 for assisted vs. non-assisted). Needle recapping practices showed no significant association.
Conclusion
BEAs are frequent among Moroccan dental students in Rabat, particularly in senior years and when procedures are unassisted. Targeted infection-control education, structured supervision, and national guidelines are needed to reduce occupational risks.
{"title":"Blood exposure accidents and associated risk factors among dental students in Rabat, Morocco: A cross-sectional study","authors":"L. Amminou, H. Soualem, S. Boukssim, S. Chbicheb","doi":"10.1016/j.infpip.2025.100498","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.infpip.2025.100498","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>Blood exposure accidents (BEAs) are a major occupational hazard for dental students. Limited data exist on their prevalence and risk factors in Morocco.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A cross-sectional survey was conducted among 236 clinical-year dental students (4th–6th year) at the Faculty of Dental Medicine, Rabat. A structured, self-administered questionnaire assessed demographics, BEA history, and clinical practices. Chi-square tests and multivariable logistic regression identified independent risk factors.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>45.3% of participants reported at least one BEA, primarily from sharp instrument injuries (55.1%) or splashes onto mucous membranes (25.2%). Multivariate analysis showed that male gender was independently associated with higher risk (∼3.3×), with female students having lower odds of BEA (OR = 0.3, 95% CI: 0.18–0.86). Advanced academic year significantly increased risk (5th year: OR = 2.7, 95% CI: 1.2–6.2; 6th year: OR = 7.0, 95% CI: 3.1–15.3), while absence of procedural assistance also increased risk (OR = 0.1, 95% CI: 0.05–0.43 for assisted vs. non-assisted). Needle recapping practices showed no significant association.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>BEAs are frequent among Moroccan dental students in Rabat, particularly in senior years and when procedures are unassisted. Targeted infection-control education, structured supervision, and national guidelines are needed to reduce occupational risks.</div></div><div><h3>Trial registration</h3><div>CERB 122-24.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":33492,"journal":{"name":"Infection Prevention in Practice","volume":"8 1","pages":"Article 100498"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2025-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145748451","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-11-08DOI: 10.1016/j.infpip.2025.100497
S. Kenny , K. Kuan , A. Walsh , S.F. FitzGerald
{"title":"Comparison of bacterial contamination between disposable and cloth caps in an operating theatre setting","authors":"S. Kenny , K. Kuan , A. Walsh , S.F. FitzGerald","doi":"10.1016/j.infpip.2025.100497","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.infpip.2025.100497","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":33492,"journal":{"name":"Infection Prevention in Practice","volume":"8 1","pages":"Article 100497"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2025-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145578419","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-11-05DOI: 10.1016/j.infpip.2025.100488
A. Melaku , T. Admasu , A. Ambelu
Introduction
Hand hygiene is crucial for preventing hospital-acquired infections (HAIs), but compliance and resource availability still fall short in developing countries. This study examined hand hygiene compliance and its determinants among healthcare workers in selected hospitals in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Methods
A mixed-methods, cross-sectional study was conducted in both public and private hospitals from December 2024 to January 2025, involving 506 healthcare workers across 19 hospitals. Twenty in-depth interviews were conducted with healthcare workers. Kobo Toolbox was used for quantitative data collection, and SPSS was used for analysis. Binary and multi-nomial logistic regression identified determinants of hand hygiene compliance (P<0.05). Thematic analysis was used to analyse qualitative data.
Results
Hand hygiene compliance showed a disparity: self-reported compliance was 71% (54.7% in public hospitals vs 87.3% in private hospitals), while observed compliance was much lower at 20.4% (11% public vs 29.8% private). Infrastructural assessment found that 79.2% of hospitals had handwashing sinks (70.9% public vs 98.6% private), 16% of which were non-functional (24.7% public vs 1.3% private). Additionally, 49.4% of hospitals lacked running water (66.8% public vs 8.6% private), and 54.6% lacked soap (79.5% public vs 9.8% private). Compliance was significantly associated with availability of a functional sink [adjusted odds ratio (AOR) 2.29, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.17–4.51], touch-free taps (AOR 3.39, 95% CI 1.6–7.17), soap (AOR 2.11, 95% CI 1.05–4.25), training (AOR 2.39, 95% CI 1.43–4.00), and a hand hygiene protocol (AOR 7.50, 95% CI 2.84–19.81). The main barriers to compliance were infrastructural deficits, glove dependency, low risk perception, and insufficient institutional prioritization.
Conclusion
Hand hygiene compliance and material provision in hospitals in Addis Ababa are low, with a notable disparity between public and private hospitals. As the presence of infrastructure alone does not ensure compliance, the availability of a functional sink with water and soap at the point of care (or alcohol-based hand rub), regular hygiene training, adequate WASH funding, and strong institutional commitment are essential.
手部卫生对于预防医院获得性感染至关重要,但在发展中国家,遵守卫生要求和资源供应仍然不足。本研究考察了埃塞俄比亚亚的斯亚贝巴选定医院的卫生保健工作者的手卫生依从性及其决定因素。方法采用混合方法,于2024年12月至2025年1月在公立和私立医院进行横断面研究,涉及19家医院的506名医护人员。对医护人员进行了20次深度访谈。采用Kobo Toolbox进行定量数据收集,采用SPSS进行分析。二元和多元逻辑回归确定了手卫生依从性的决定因素(P<0.05)。采用专题分析对定性数据进行分析。结果口腔卫生依从性存在差异:自我报告的依从性为71%(公立医院为54.7%,私立医院为87.3%),而观察到的依从性为20.4%(公立医院为11%,私立医院为29.8%)。基础设施评估发现,79.2%的医院有洗手槽(70.9%的公立医院对98.6%的私立医院),其中16%的医院没有功能(24.7%的公立医院对1.3%的私立医院)。此外,49.4%的医院没有自来水(66.8%的公立医院比8.6%的私立医院),54.6%的医院没有肥皂(79.5%的公立医院比9.8%的私立医院)。依从性与功能水槽的可用性显著相关[调整优势比(AOR) 2.29, 95%可信区间(CI) 1.17-4.51]、免触水龙头(AOR 3.39, 95% CI 1.6-7.17)、肥皂(AOR 2.11, 95% CI 1.05-4.25)、训练(AOR 2.39, 95% CI 1.43-4.00)和手卫生方案(AOR 7.50, 95% CI 2.84-19.81)。合规的主要障碍是基础设施缺陷、手套依赖、低风险认知和机构优先级不足。结论亚的斯亚贝巴市医院的手卫生依从性和用品供应较低,公立医院与私立医院之间存在显著差异。由于仅有基础设施并不能确保遵守规定,因此必须在护理点提供带水和肥皂(或含酒精的洗手液)的功能性洗涤槽、定期的卫生培训、充足的讲卫生资金以及强有力的机构承诺。
{"title":"Determinants of hand hygiene compliance among healthcare workers in public and private hospitals of Addis Ababa, Ethiopia","authors":"A. Melaku , T. Admasu , A. Ambelu","doi":"10.1016/j.infpip.2025.100488","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.infpip.2025.100488","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Hand hygiene is crucial for preventing hospital-acquired infections (HAIs), but compliance and resource availability still fall short in developing countries. This study examined hand hygiene compliance and its determinants among healthcare workers in selected hospitals in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A mixed-methods, cross-sectional study was conducted in both public and private hospitals from December 2024 to January 2025, involving 506 healthcare workers across 19 hospitals. Twenty in-depth interviews were conducted with healthcare workers. Kobo Toolbox was used for quantitative data collection, and SPSS was used for analysis. Binary and multi-nomial logistic regression identified determinants of hand hygiene compliance (<em>P</em><0.05). Thematic analysis was used to analyse qualitative data.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Hand hygiene compliance showed a disparity: self-reported compliance was 71% (54.7% in public hospitals vs 87.3% in private hospitals), while observed compliance was much lower at 20.4% (11% public vs 29.8% private). Infrastructural assessment found that 79.2% of hospitals had handwashing sinks (70.9% public vs 98.6% private), 16% of which were non-functional (24.7% public vs 1.3% private). Additionally, 49.4% of hospitals lacked running water (66.8% public vs 8.6% private), and 54.6% lacked soap (79.5% public vs 9.8% private). Compliance was significantly associated with availability of a functional sink [adjusted odds ratio (AOR) 2.29, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.17–4.51], touch-free taps (AOR 3.39, 95% CI 1.6–7.17), soap (AOR 2.11, 95% CI 1.05–4.25), training (AOR 2.39, 95% CI 1.43–4.00), and a hand hygiene protocol (AOR 7.50, 95% CI 2.84–19.81). The main barriers to compliance were infrastructural deficits, glove dependency, low risk perception, and insufficient institutional prioritization.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Hand hygiene compliance and material provision in hospitals in Addis Ababa are low, with a notable disparity between public and private hospitals. As the presence of infrastructure alone does not ensure compliance, the availability of a functional sink with water and soap at the point of care (or alcohol-based hand rub), regular hygiene training, adequate WASH funding, and strong institutional commitment are essential.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":33492,"journal":{"name":"Infection Prevention in Practice","volume":"8 1","pages":"Article 100488"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2025-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145578418","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}