An explorative study of the Chinese Pictorial Version of Children's Dissociative Experiences Scale and Posttraumatic Symptom Inventory

Salina Siu-ying Ho , Alan Yuk-lun Chan , Gabriel Wing-ho Cheng
{"title":"An explorative study of the Chinese Pictorial Version of Children's Dissociative Experiences Scale and Posttraumatic Symptom Inventory","authors":"Salina Siu-ying Ho ,&nbsp;Alan Yuk-lun Chan ,&nbsp;Gabriel Wing-ho Cheng","doi":"10.1016/j.ejtd.2024.100386","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p><span>Psychometric<span> tools for assessing or screening young children with complex trauma and dissociation based on their own subjective experience are very limited. The present study aimed to explore the applicability of the Chinese translated pictorial version of </span></span><em>Children's Dissociative Experiences Scale and Posttraumatic Symptom Inventory</em> (CDES/PTSI) for children aged 5 to 11.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To examine the psychometric properties of the newly developed <em>Chinese Pictorial Version of Children's Dissociative Experiences Scale and Posttraumatic Symptom Inventory</em> (CP-CDES/PTSI) in a group of Chinese young children.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>The CP-CDES/PTSI was administered to (<em>N</em> = 85) children aged from 5 to 11 for trial use. The <em>Child Trauma Screen</em> (CTS) and <em>Child Dissociative Checklist</em><span><span> (CDC) were selected as criterion scales to measure children's dissociative and post-traumatic stress symptoms, as reported by their caregivers. The scale reliability was measured by Cronbach's alpha, the Guttman split-half reliability and index of coefficient Omega. The validity was assessed by correlation, hierarchical regression and multimodal analyses. </span>ANOVA was used to conduct subgroup analysis to investigate the applicability of the instrument on younger children.</span></p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The CP-CDES/PTSI presented with good internal reliability as well as established convergent and predictive validity to dissociative symptoms. The total score was significantly associated with dissociative symptoms in children as reported by their caregivers. A majority (78 %) of children aged between 60 and 71 months could comprehend and finish the test satisfactorily, while all children aged 72 months or above in the group could comprehend the test competently.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The findings suggested that the CP-CDES/PTSI can be used with children with age as young as 5 in a Chinese population.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":29932,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Trauma & Dissociation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Trauma & Dissociation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468749924000103","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Psychometric tools for assessing or screening young children with complex trauma and dissociation based on their own subjective experience are very limited. The present study aimed to explore the applicability of the Chinese translated pictorial version of Children's Dissociative Experiences Scale and Posttraumatic Symptom Inventory (CDES/PTSI) for children aged 5 to 11.

Objective

To examine the psychometric properties of the newly developed Chinese Pictorial Version of Children's Dissociative Experiences Scale and Posttraumatic Symptom Inventory (CP-CDES/PTSI) in a group of Chinese young children.

Method

The CP-CDES/PTSI was administered to (N = 85) children aged from 5 to 11 for trial use. The Child Trauma Screen (CTS) and Child Dissociative Checklist (CDC) were selected as criterion scales to measure children's dissociative and post-traumatic stress symptoms, as reported by their caregivers. The scale reliability was measured by Cronbach's alpha, the Guttman split-half reliability and index of coefficient Omega. The validity was assessed by correlation, hierarchical regression and multimodal analyses. ANOVA was used to conduct subgroup analysis to investigate the applicability of the instrument on younger children.

Results

The CP-CDES/PTSI presented with good internal reliability as well as established convergent and predictive validity to dissociative symptoms. The total score was significantly associated with dissociative symptoms in children as reported by their caregivers. A majority (78 %) of children aged between 60 and 71 months could comprehend and finish the test satisfactorily, while all children aged 72 months or above in the group could comprehend the test competently.

Conclusion

The findings suggested that the CP-CDES/PTSI can be used with children with age as young as 5 in a Chinese population.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
儿童分离体验量表和创伤后症状量表中文图解版的探索性研究
导言:基于儿童自身主观体验来评估或筛查患有复杂创伤和分离症的幼儿的心理测量工具非常有限。本研究旨在探讨中文译本的儿童分离体验量表和创伤后症状量表(CDES/PTSI)对5至11岁儿童的适用性。方法对(N = 85)名5至11岁的儿童试用CP-CDES/PTSI。选取儿童创伤筛查(CTS)和儿童分离性核对表(CDC)作为标准量表,以测量儿童的分离性症状和创伤后应激症状,这些症状由儿童的照顾者报告。量表的信度通过克朗巴赫α、古特曼分半信度和欧米茄系数指数进行测量。效度通过相关分析、分层回归分析和多模式分析进行评估。结果CP-CDES/PTSI具有良好的内部信度,对分离症状的聚合效度和预测效度均已确立。根据照顾者的报告,总分与儿童的分离症状有明显关联。大多数(78%)年龄在 60 到 71 个月之间的儿童能够理解并满意地完成测试,而所有年龄在 72 个月或以上的儿童都能胜任测试。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
4.80%
发文量
60
期刊最新文献
The effectiveness of Reconsolidation of Traumatic Memories for Complex PTSD – A pilot quasi-experimental study from a wellness centre in India Adverse childhood experiences and dissociation among Italian public psychology service users Résistance et trauma: introduire l'existence Exploring the interplay between dreams, Early Maladaptive Schemas and demanding parenting style in Malaysia: A qualitative study Parent-Child EMDR therapy for children aged 0–4 years: Protocol, pilot-data, and case study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1