Investigating the effects of surgical access time on scar quality and function in pediatric upper-extremity burn contractures in a rural area

IF 0.1 Q4 SURGERY Turkish Journal of Plastic Surgery Pub Date : 2024-01-01 DOI:10.4103/tjps.tjps_60_23
B. Tatar
{"title":"Investigating the effects of surgical access time on scar quality and function in pediatric upper-extremity burn contractures in a rural area","authors":"B. Tatar","doi":"10.4103/tjps.tjps_60_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Burn contractures are a common complication in the pediatric population, leading to significant functional limitations and decreased quality of life. This study aimed to investigate the impact of surgical access time on burn contracture outcomes in pediatric patients, particularly wound quality and hand function. Materials and Methods: This retrospective study included 27 pediatric patients with upper-extremity burn contractures between November 2022 and August 2023. Patients with underlying medical conditions or medications were excluded from this study. A variety of surgical procedures were performed, and complications, follow-up times, access times, and postoperative evaluations were assessed. Contracture locations were divided into four groups: axilla (Group I), elbow (Group II), wrist (Group III), and fingers (Group IV). Access time was defined as the time from symptom onset to first surgical intervention. Results: Among the 27 patients with pediatric burn contractures, Group II had significantly longer access times than the other groups (P < 0.05). This delayed access was associated with lower Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS) and Michigan Hand Outcome Questionnaire (MHQ) scores in Group II (P < 0.05), indicating worse wound quality and hand function in Group II. Correlation analysis in Group II revealed a significant negative correlation between access time and POSAS (−0.8, P = 0.036) and MHQ scores (r = −0.43, P = 0.039). The changes in Groups I, III, and IV are statistically significant in terms of range of motion (P < 0.05). Conclusion: This study suggests that access time is an important factor for pediatric burn contractures. Early surgical intervention has been associated with improved wound quality and hand function.","PeriodicalId":42065,"journal":{"name":"Turkish Journal of Plastic Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Turkish Journal of Plastic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/tjps.tjps_60_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Burn contractures are a common complication in the pediatric population, leading to significant functional limitations and decreased quality of life. This study aimed to investigate the impact of surgical access time on burn contracture outcomes in pediatric patients, particularly wound quality and hand function. Materials and Methods: This retrospective study included 27 pediatric patients with upper-extremity burn contractures between November 2022 and August 2023. Patients with underlying medical conditions or medications were excluded from this study. A variety of surgical procedures were performed, and complications, follow-up times, access times, and postoperative evaluations were assessed. Contracture locations were divided into four groups: axilla (Group I), elbow (Group II), wrist (Group III), and fingers (Group IV). Access time was defined as the time from symptom onset to first surgical intervention. Results: Among the 27 patients with pediatric burn contractures, Group II had significantly longer access times than the other groups (P < 0.05). This delayed access was associated with lower Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS) and Michigan Hand Outcome Questionnaire (MHQ) scores in Group II (P < 0.05), indicating worse wound quality and hand function in Group II. Correlation analysis in Group II revealed a significant negative correlation between access time and POSAS (−0.8, P = 0.036) and MHQ scores (r = −0.43, P = 0.039). The changes in Groups I, III, and IV are statistically significant in terms of range of motion (P < 0.05). Conclusion: This study suggests that access time is an important factor for pediatric burn contractures. Early surgical intervention has been associated with improved wound quality and hand function.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
调查手术入路时间对农村地区小儿上肢烧伤挛缩疤痕质量和功能的影响
背景:烧伤挛缩是儿科常见的并发症,会导致严重的功能限制和生活质量下降。本研究旨在探讨手术入路时间对儿科烧伤挛缩预后的影响,尤其是伤口质量和手部功能。材料和方法:这项回顾性研究纳入了 2022 年 11 月至 2023 年 8 月期间 27 名上肢烧伤挛缩的儿科患者。本研究排除了患有基础疾病或服用药物的患者。研究人员进行了各种手术,并对并发症、随访时间、入路时间和术后评估进行了评估。挛缩部位分为四组:腋窝(第一组)、肘部(第二组)、腕部(第三组)和手指(第四组)。手术时间定义为从症状出现到首次手术干预的时间。结果在 27 名小儿烧伤挛缩患者中,II 组的入院时间明显长于其他组(P < 0.05)。第二组的患者和观察者疤痕评估量表(POSAS)和密歇根手部结果问卷(MHQ)得分较低(P<0.05),这说明第二组的伤口质量和手部功能较差。第二组的相关性分析显示,入路时间与 POSAS(-0.8,P = 0.036)和 MHQ 评分(r = -0.43,P = 0.039)之间存在显著负相关。就活动范围而言,第一、第三和第四组的变化具有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。结论本研究表明,手术时间是造成小儿烧伤挛缩的重要因素。早期手术干预与伤口质量和手部功能的改善有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
审稿时长
28 weeks
期刊最新文献
Glomus tumors of the digit: A retrospective analysis of clinical and functional outcomes The effect of deferoxamine on fat graft survival in tamoxifen use: An experimental study Nasal reconstruction in a rare case of unilateral arhinia in bosma arhinia microphthalmia syndrome A complication after radiofrequency ablation: Skin necrosis Comparative analysis of speech outcomes in the treatment of velopharyngeal insufficiency: Traditional superior-based pharyngeal flap and pharyngeal flap combined with radical intravelar veloplasty
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1