Novel Noninvasive Hybrid Flap Preconditioning Surpasses Surgical Delay in the Murine Model.

IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q1 SURGERY Plastic and reconstructive surgery Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-01-23 DOI:10.1097/PRS.0000000000011305
Xingyi Du, Wenyue Liu, Boyang Xu, Jie Luan, Chunjun Liu
{"title":"Novel Noninvasive Hybrid Flap Preconditioning Surpasses Surgical Delay in the Murine Model.","authors":"Xingyi Du, Wenyue Liu, Boyang Xu, Jie Luan, Chunjun Liu","doi":"10.1097/PRS.0000000000011305","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Ischemic necrosis in the distal portion of a flap is a challenging complication in plastic surgery. The authors hypothesized that a novel hybrid flap preconditioning (HFP) device combining foam-mediated external suction and nonsurgical delay can promote skin flap survival better than surgical delay.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Twenty-eight mice were divided into 4 groups: a control group, in which a 4 × 1.5-cm dorsal flap was made with no preconditioning; a surgical delay group, in which surgical delay occurred 7 days before flap elevation; a foam-mediated external suction (FMES) group, in which foam-mediated external suction at -100 mm Hg was used 5 hours a day for 6 days, and the flap was elevated on the seventh day; and a hybrid flap preconditioning (HFP) group, in which silicone strips were applied along the contour of the foam interface. The same negative-pressure protocol was used as in the FMES group. Seven days after flap elevation, macroscopic, histologic, and Western blot analyses were performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The flap survival rate was 46.25% (8.12%) in the control group, 68.72% (7.00%) in the surgical delay group, 57.03% (8.17%) in the FMES group, and 80.66% (3.27%) in the HFP group. Immunohistologic analysis of CD31 + cells in the distal end of viable tissue procured 7 days after flap elevation showed significantly higher angiogenesis in the surgical delay and HFP groups. Western blot results showed an increased expression of vascular endothelial growth factor in the surgical delay and HFP groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The authors developed and fabricated a novel HFP device combining foam-mediated external suction and nonsurgical delay. The concept of HFP has proved to promote flap survival better than surgical delay.</p><p><strong>Clinical relevance statement: </strong>This study presented an innovative noninvasive method of flap preconditioning, which has been demonstrated to be superior to surgical delay in a murine model and holds promise for potential application in clinical settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":20128,"journal":{"name":"Plastic and reconstructive surgery","volume":" ","pages":"1003-1012"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plastic and reconstructive surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000011305","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Ischemic necrosis in the distal portion of a flap is a challenging complication in plastic surgery. The authors hypothesized that a novel hybrid flap preconditioning (HFP) device combining foam-mediated external suction and nonsurgical delay can promote skin flap survival better than surgical delay.

Method: Twenty-eight mice were divided into 4 groups: a control group, in which a 4 × 1.5-cm dorsal flap was made with no preconditioning; a surgical delay group, in which surgical delay occurred 7 days before flap elevation; a foam-mediated external suction (FMES) group, in which foam-mediated external suction at -100 mm Hg was used 5 hours a day for 6 days, and the flap was elevated on the seventh day; and a hybrid flap preconditioning (HFP) group, in which silicone strips were applied along the contour of the foam interface. The same negative-pressure protocol was used as in the FMES group. Seven days after flap elevation, macroscopic, histologic, and Western blot analyses were performed.

Results: The flap survival rate was 46.25% (8.12%) in the control group, 68.72% (7.00%) in the surgical delay group, 57.03% (8.17%) in the FMES group, and 80.66% (3.27%) in the HFP group. Immunohistologic analysis of CD31 + cells in the distal end of viable tissue procured 7 days after flap elevation showed significantly higher angiogenesis in the surgical delay and HFP groups. Western blot results showed an increased expression of vascular endothelial growth factor in the surgical delay and HFP groups.

Conclusions: The authors developed and fabricated a novel HFP device combining foam-mediated external suction and nonsurgical delay. The concept of HFP has proved to promote flap survival better than surgical delay.

Clinical relevance statement: This study presented an innovative noninvasive method of flap preconditioning, which has been demonstrated to be superior to surgical delay in a murine model and holds promise for potential application in clinical settings.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
新型无创混合皮瓣预处理 (HFP) 在小鼠模型中超越了手术延迟。
背景:皮瓣远端缺血坏死是整形外科手术中极具挑战性的并发症。我们假设一种新型混合皮瓣预处理(HFP)装置结合了泡沫介导的外部抽吸和非手术延迟,能比手术延迟更好地促进皮瓣存活:将 28 只小鼠分为四组。对照组:制作 4*1.5 的背侧皮瓣,不进行预处理。手术延迟(SD)组:皮瓣隆起前 7 天进行手术延迟。泡沫介导外抽吸(FMES)组:每天使用-100mmHg泡沫介导外抽吸5小时,持续6天,第七天抬高皮瓣。混合皮瓣预处理(HFP)组:沿着泡沫界面的轮廓贴上硅胶条。负压方案与 FMES 组相同。皮瓣隆起七天后,进行宏观、组织学和 Western blot 分析:结果:对照组皮瓣存活率为 46.25%(8.12%),SD 组为 68.72%(7.00%),FMES 组为 57.03%(8.17%),HFP 组为 80.66%(3.27%)。免疫组织学分析显示,在皮瓣隆起七天后,SD 组和 HFP 组的血管生成率明显高于 FMES 组。Western Blot 结果显示,SD 组和 HFP 组的血管内皮生长因子表达量增加:我们开发并制造了一种新型混合皮瓣预处理(HFP)装置,该装置结合了泡沫介导的外部抽吸和非手术延迟。事实证明,HFP 的概念比手术延迟能更好地促进皮瓣存活。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
13.90%
发文量
1436
审稿时长
1.5 months
期刊介绍: For more than 70 years Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery® has been the one consistently excellent reference for every specialist who uses plastic surgery techniques or works in conjunction with a plastic surgeon. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery® , the official journal of the American Society of Plastic Surgeons, is a benefit of Society membership, and is also available on a subscription basis. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery® brings subscribers up-to-the-minute reports on the latest techniques and follow-up for all areas of plastic and reconstructive surgery, including breast reconstruction, experimental studies, maxillofacial reconstruction, hand and microsurgery, burn repair, cosmetic surgery, as well as news on medicolegal issues. The cosmetic section provides expanded coverage on new procedures and techniques and offers more cosmetic-specific content than any other journal. All subscribers enjoy full access to the Journal''s website, which features broadcast quality videos of reconstructive and cosmetic procedures, podcasts, comprehensive article archives dating to 1946, and additional benefits offered by the newly-redesigned website.
期刊最新文献
Spontaneous recovery of active shoulder external rotation in patients with brachial plexus birth injury. Comparative effectiveness of pre-epiglottic baton plates and mandibular distraction in infants with Robin sequence. Long-Term Surgical Outcomes of Intermediate Cleft Rhinoplasty. Predictors of Facial Synkinesis Severity. The Racial Representation of Cosmetic Minimally Invasive Procedure Patients and Physicians on Social Media.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1